<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor &#8211; Supreme Court Nominee a Lightweight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/</link>
	<description>The Progressive Hunter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:42:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prompter Goes To Town &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick scan of the net - prompter</title>
		<link>http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/comment-page-1/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>Prompter Goes To Town &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick scan of the net - prompter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyroom.net/blog/?p=731#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>[...] http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/tvnewser CBS and ABC have two-shot of #Obama and #Sotomayor w/o prompter…cablers stuck with prompter covering #Sotomayor&#8217;s face. SonOfDeepThroat SEN STAFR: “9 Dems intend to vote NO on Sotomayor: Baucus, Tester, Bennet, Dorgan, Johnson, &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/tvnewser" rel="nofollow">http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/tvnewser</a> CBS and ABC have two-shot of #Obama and #Sotomayor w/o prompter…cablers stuck with prompter covering #Sotomayor&#8217;s face. SonOfDeepThroat SEN STAFR: “9 Dems intend to vote NO on Sotomayor: Baucus, Tester, Bennet, Dorgan, Johnson, &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMH</title>
		<link>http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/comment-page-1/#comment-5323</link>
		<dc:creator>TMH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyroom.net/blog/?p=731#comment-5323</guid>
		<description>Well, Chris, since you don&#039;t know me, you wouldn&#039;t know that I am not a Republican. I am a Constitutionalist. There were many, many things I did not support about President Bush or Bush Senior...

You give no basis for your views other than a liberal catchall that &quot;she is a fantastic choice.&quot; In fact, with your depth of legal training, perhaps you should sit on the high court. Probably would not make any difference either way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Chris, since you don&#8217;t know me, you wouldn&#8217;t know that I am not a Republican. I am a Constitutionalist. There were many, many things I did not support about President Bush or Bush Senior&#8230;</p>
<p>You give no basis for your views other than a liberal catchall that &#8220;she is a fantastic choice.&#8221; In fact, with your depth of legal training, perhaps you should sit on the high court. Probably would not make any difference either way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Ronk</title>
		<link>http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/comment-page-1/#comment-5322</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ronk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyroom.net/blog/?p=731#comment-5322</guid>
		<description>Regardless of what you think, she is fantastic choice for the supreme court. She is tremendously experienced and has worked very hard to get where she is. We need a voice for everyone in our upper courts.

I imagine there will be a lot of mudslinging from Republicans, but they will do so at their own peril. Especially since she was a George H. Bush appointee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of what you think, she is fantastic choice for the supreme court. She is tremendously experienced and has worked very hard to get where she is. We need a voice for everyone in our upper courts.</p>
<p>I imagine there will be a lot of mudslinging from Republicans, but they will do so at their own peril. Especially since she was a George H. Bush appointee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotomayor - Supreme Court Nominee a Lightweight &#60; It&#8217;s all about the trends</title>
		<link>http://noisyroom.net/blog/2009/05/26/sotomayor-supreme-court-nominee-a-lightweight/comment-page-1/#comment-5321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotomayor - Supreme Court Nominee a Lightweight &#60; It&#8217;s all about the trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisyroom.net/blog/?p=731#comment-5321</guid>
		<description>[...] and authority. However, not all Democrats are happy with this pick. From Twitter: tvnewser CBS a click for more             var gaJsHost = ((&quot;https:&quot; == document.location.protocol) ? &quot;https://ssl.&quot; : [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and authority. However, not all Democrats are happy with this pick. From Twitter: tvnewser CBS a click for more             var gaJsHost = ((&#8220;https:&#8221; == document.location.protocol) ? &#8220;https://ssl.&#8221; : [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

