06/3/10

Far Left Rep. Linda Sanchez Smears Arizona

By: Trevor Loudon
KeyWikiBlog

Far left California Democratic Congresswoman Linda Sanchez claims that “white supremacist” groups are behind Arizona’s new immigration laws. Sanchez also claims that these unnamed groups are pushing to implement similar legislation in other States.

Sanchez’s comments can be best seen in light of a campaign by the Marxist left – specifically the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America, to demonize and isolate Arizona.

The left want to make an example of Arizona to deter other states from going down the same path.

Sanchez herself is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America aligned Congressional Progressive Caucus. She also serves on the board of the Economic Policy Institute alongside several D.S.A. connected people including Barry Bluestone, Leo Gerard, Teresa Ghiladucci, Robert Kuttner, Julianne Malveaux, Larry Mishel and Bruce Raynor.

In 2008, Sanchez served on Barack Obama’s Latino Advisory Council with current Obama Labor Secretary, the D.S.A. connected Hilda Solis, D.S.A. member Eliseo Medina and far left reps Luis Gutierrez and Nydia Velasquez.

Coincidentally Solis, Medina, Gutierrez and Velasquez are all leaders in the “immigration reform” movement, which seeks to legalize more than 12 million illegal immigrants. Medina has openly admitted that a major reason for doing this is to hand the Democrats at least 8 million new voters.

Many of this group have Cuban connections.

From April 9-April 16, 2004, Linda Sanchez was in Havana Cuba for “education.” The trip was funded by the far left William C. Velasquez Institute – total cost: $7,500.00.

From April 11 – 14, 2001, Hilda Solis was in Cuba for unspecified purposes. The trip which was also funded by the William C. Velasquez Institute – cost: $1,214.50.

A major focus of the William C. Velasquez Institute is “promoting greater dialogue between the U.S. and Cuba.”

According to Communist Party USA paper Peoples Weekly World of October 28 1995:

Almost 1,600 Harlemites and solidarity activists packed the Abyssinian Baptist Church to give a hero’s welcome to Fidel Castro, the president of Cuba.

The mainly African American audience, which included New York Democratic representatives Charles Rangel and Nydia Velasquez, enthusiastically greeted the Communist leader with a 10-minute standing ovation. Chants of “Cuba si, Bloqueo no!” resounded from the rafters and sent a strong message of protest to New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and President Clinton for excluding the Cuban leader from their sponsored events.

The audience erupted in shouts of “Fidel, Fidel,” when Elombe Brath, head of the Patrice Lumumba Coalition and chair for the meeting, asked the audience, “Who would you rather come to Harlem, Fidel or Giuliani?”

Luis Gutierrez is a former leader of the Marxist-Leninist and militantly pro–Cuban Puerto Rican Socialist Party.

Unlike Linda Sanchez, this blog is willing to name names and deal in facts.

06/3/10

Christie’s Message to the NJEA

I love this guy… 8)

He also asks somewhere (can’t find the video – from Glenn Beck):

You know that there is over 5 million children trapped in over 10,000 failing public schools around America. And I use the word ‘trapped,’ and I use it directly. They are trapped by an educational bureaucracy. They are trapped by a selfish, self-interested, greedy school union that cares more about the money in their own pocket and the pockets of members than they care about educating our most vulnerable and needy children around the country.

By those children I mean very clearly, as you know, more than 50% of those children that we are talking about are in our largest cities and they do not graduate. 50% of the children in our largest cities in America never graduate from high school. In New Jersey, in the city of Newark, we are expending $24,000 per pupil, in public money, for an absolutely disgraceful public education system.

Damn, this guy should be President. Really – now…

06/3/10

Links To Visit – 06/03/10

JammieWearingFool – Something In The Bloody Tea?

RCP – Krauthammer: Carbon Tax Would Be “Transfer Of Wealth” To China (Hat Tip: Brian B.)

Barack Obama’s Oil Spill’s Blog – Now They’re Trying To Give Me A Vasectomy

NewsMax – Liberal Groups Want FCC to Police Talk Radio, Cable News

BBC News – Academic quits GM food committee (Hat Tip: Jean Stoner)

Free Republic – Veteran Journalist Who Broke Sestak Job Offer Story Recounts Interview on Hannity – Video (Hat Tip: Jean Stoner)

American Thinker – Don’t be fooled by Obama’s ‘incompetence’ (Hat Tip: Pierre Legrand’s Pink Flamingo Bar)

examiner.com – L.A. schools declare war on Arizona

Ann Coulter – Did You Plug The Hole With A Blue Dress Yet, Daddy?

WND – White House ‘explanation’ suggests criminal ‘evasion’

Aaron Proctor – This week’s show

examiner.com – Philly employees live like kings while you make ends meet

Continue reading

06/3/10

Islamo-Marxism and Al-Qa’idah

By: Trevor Loudon
KeyWikiBlog

Cross posted from New Zeal.

Westerners need to get their heads around the fact, that much of what we understand as radical Islam, or Islamic terrorism, is in fact Islamo-Marxism.

Just as most radical “Christians” are actually Marxists, much of radical Islam is fostered and promoted by Marxist forces.

Here is an interesting snippet from the Yearbook of International Communist Affairs 1971, page 285.

The writer is quoting a Lebanese publication, which is commenting on a split within the Iraqi Communist Party.

That all was not well even within the ranks of the Central Committee was revealed by the Beirut weekly “al-Sayyad” (24 July), which reproduced sections of a clandestine publication called “al-Qa’idah” (The Base), reputedly the organ of a new splinter group “Al-Qa’idah” charged the pro-Soviet Central Committee with “appeasement of the right, deviation from Marxism, depriving the revolution of its content and imposing an ideological reign of terror on the bases, as well as betraying the Palestinian cause.”

It held the Central Committee leaders guilty of “stealing the funds of the party and spending them on pleasures of different kinds” and of vacillating between the left and right in accord with their personal interests.”

Is this the real origin of what we now know as Al Qaeda? More research required.