By: Trevor Loudon
Red Reps 4 here.
The U.S.’s largest Marxist organization Democratic Socialists of America has infiltrated members and supporters into several state legislatures across the nation. Usually posing as Democrats, the covert socialists are then used to promote D.S.A. legislation and causes, such as gun control, single payer health care, leftist labor legislation etc. at the state level.
First elected to the Minnesota House of Representatives in 1996, Paymar is now serving in his 7th term as a legislator from St. Paul, Minnesota. He is chair of the Public Safety Finance Division which has budget oversight over the Department of Correction, Department of Public Safety, Department of Human Rights, the Courts and crime victim programs. He is also member of the House Finance Committee, Public Safety Policy Division and the Civil Justice Division.
Michael Paymar is also a member of the Council of State Governments Public Safety and Justice Task Force and the National Conference of State Legislatures Committee on Law and Justice.
Paymar has been a strong advocate of gun control, socialized health care and of measures to combat domestic violence. The last is a very worthy cause, but is one often hi-jacked by feminists and socialists to extract money from government and foundations and to denigrate men and masculine institutions.
Paymar is a co-founder of the well known (some would say “infamous”) Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Project.
Paymar serves a Resource Specialist for the leftist Battered Women’s Justice Program in Minneapolis, providing training and technical assistance to professionals in the criminal and civil justice system, law enforcement and the U.S. military on ways to end domestic violence.
As a consultant with George Soros‘ Soros foundation and Advocates for Human Rights, Michael Paymar worked with NGOs in Eastern Europe, Europe, the Caucusus, central Asia, China and Australia. He has worked with the Department of Defense in the United States and military installations in Japan, Guam, Iceland, Hawaii, North Carolina, Florida and California.
In 2010 Paymar addressed a National Institute of Justice conference on the Violence Against Women Act, with Lynn Rosenthal, White House Advisor on Violence Against Women, Office of the Vice President of the United States.
What evidence do I have to prove that Michael Paymar is a covert Marxist?
In 1996, D.S.A. sent six staff members into the field for the final weeks of the election campaign. These staff and D.S.A. volunteers “contributed to the re-election of Senator Paul Wellstone and Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-upstate NY).”
D.S.A. leader Christine Riddiough was assigned to Wellstone’s campaign in Minnesota. While there she also met Michael Paymar:
While in Minnesota I had the fortune to meet with many members of Twin Cities DSA. The group is planning to meet regularly to work on DSA’s Action Agenda and to draw together Minnesota socialists. In my election work I ran across another DSA member, Michael Paymar, who was running for the Minnesota legislature. Along with Wellstone, he, too, won on Tuesday. He now joins the ranks of DSAers and other progressives who are trying to change American politics while serving in public office.
D.S.A.’s Democratic Left, Nov./Dec. 1996, page 18
How many of the thousands of Minnesota voters who put Michael Paymar into office realized they were voting for a covert Marxist? Has any of Michael Paymar’s campaign literature, or public statements ever mentioned his Democratic Socialists of America affiliation?
D.S.A.’s goals include to “abolish private ownership of the means of production,” increase progressive taxation, promote gun control, introduce socialized health care in every state and gradually turn the U.S. into a socialist country.
Are these aims in line with the views of most Minnesota voters?
Perhaps some enterprising journalist could ask Michael Paymar to explain his Marxist affiliations and why he has never bothered to tell Minnesota voters about his D.S.A. connection.
By: Trevor Loudon
Click to Enlarge
“Inspire” is an English language online magazine reported to be published by the organization Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). The English language glossy magazine is extremely well produced and is aimed at U.S. and European audiences.
The magazine is thought to be the work of Anwar al-Awlaki, an English-speaking cleric and al-Qaeda leader based in Yemen. Awlaki is currently on the United States’ “kill or capture” list.
The editorial in Inspire’s March 2011 issue, signed by one Yahya Ibrahim, analyzes recent turmoil in the Middle East and consequences for Al Qaeda, Israel and the West.
Al Qaeda sees the recent uprisings across the region as opening up new opportunities to attack Israel.
Al Qaeda and the Arabic community or “ummah” plan to “meet” in the sacred Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.
The editorial does not make comforting reading, for those who think “democracy” is “sweeping the Arab world.”
The cover of this issue is about the Tsunami of change that is sweeping the Arab world. With the removal of the despots, the ummah will speak its voice, and when it does, it will chant: Here we start and in al-Aqsa we’ll meet.
The biggest barrier between the mujahidin and freeing al-Aqsa were the tyrant rulers. Now that the friends of America and Israel are being mopped out one after the other, our aspirations are great that the path between us and al-Aqsa is clearing up.
There could be no freeing of Palestine with the presence of the likes of King Abdullah to the East, Hosni Mubarak to the West and al-Saud to the South. Now that Hosni is gone, we heard the Imam of the Friday prayers praying: “O Allah we ask you to allow us to meet in al-Aqsa,” and the millions in Tahrir square roared with one voice: Âmîn.
The issue of Palestine is central to the Muslim ummah and now that the masses have spoken, there is no doubt that it will be back to the forefront.
The friends of the West are leaving, the issue of Palestine will be back on the table, the preaching of jihad for the defense of the Muslim ummah will be heard publicly in societies that have freed themselves from the tyrants, and we pray that the heavy handed security measures imposed by the despots to keep America and its allies safe and keep their populations terrorized will be over.
The West has publicly stated its support for the revolution of the masses. But do they really mean it? Or is it because they do not realize the reality of what is happening? Or is it just because they feel that they must join the bandwagon?
The West also believes that the revolts are bad for al Qaeda. This is not the case. Why would the freedoms being granted to the people be bad for al Qaeda? If freedom is so bad for al Qaeda, how come the West has been practicing a restriction on the freedoms of expression when it comes to the message of the mujahidin? Why does the West ban the spread of books and talks of the al Qaeda leadership and in some countries consider it to be a crime to be in possession of such material? Why did the U.S. request from a site such as YouTube to take off lectures by Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki?
Another line that is being pushed by Western leaders is that because the protests in Egypt and Tunisia were peaceful, they proved al Qaeda – which calls for armed struggle – to be wrong. That is another fallacy. Al Qaeda is not against regime changes through protests but it is against the idea that the change should be only through peaceful means to the exclusion of the use of force. In fact Shaykh Ayman al-Zawahiri spoke in support of the protests that swept Egypt back in 2007 and he alluded to the fact that even if the protests were peaceful, the people need to prepare themselves militarily.
The accuracy of this view is proven by the turn of events in Libya. If the protesters in Libya did not have the flexibility to use force when needed, the uprising would have been crushed.
It is our opinion that the revolutions that are shaking the thrones of dictators are good for the Muslims, good for the mujahidin and bad for the imperialists of the West and their henchmen in the Muslim world.
We are very optimistic and have great expectations of what is to come.
I hope this editorial is widely circulated. Western military resources are being risked and tax money being wasted to “liberate” Libya. The West has stood by, even offered encouragement, while Islamic and socialist extremists have toppled or endangered several pro-Western, or moderate regimes in the Middle East.
These revolutions are not about “democracy.” They are about bringing anti-Western extremists to power in every nation in the region.
Israel, and other Western nations, could suffer horrendous consequences if this madness is not reversed.
We should take our enemy at his word.
Colmes is a liberal idiot and a tool.
From: The Watcher’s Council
The Council has spoken, the votes have been cast and the results are in for this week, carved eternally in the records of cyberspace.
One thing many people have been asking is why Libya? Why now? And who benefits? This week’s winner, New Zeal, took a look at the motivation for this war in terms of a new, internationalist doctrine promulgated by the UN and the Obama Administration and the Soros connection in his fine piece, “Responsibility to Protect” – The End of National Sovereignty As We Know It? Here’s a slice:
Glenn Beck has explained President Obama’s decision to attack Libya in terms of the United Nations’ “Responsibility to Protect Doctrine.”
Mr Beck is right.
According to Radio Free Europe:
Those who justify the Libyan intervention on humanitarian grounds draw much of their logic from a concept which has dramatically gained ground over recent decades. The concept is known as “R2P,” shorthand for the world’s “Responsibility to Protect” civilians.
But what does this catchy little phrase mean? Where did it come from? What are its implications?
The United Nations reported in July 2009:
The Obama administration is supporting moves to implement an U.N. doctrine calling for collective military action to halt genocide. In a week-long debate on implementing the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, the U.S. joined a majority of U.N. countries, including Russia and China, in supporting implementation of the policy. The doctrine itself was approved in 2005 by more than 150 states including the U.S.
The doctrine specifies that diplomatic options such as internal conflict resolution, sanctions, and prosecution by the International Criminal Court, should be used first. If they don’t work, then a multi-national force approved by the Security Council would be deployed.
In other words, if the United Nations does not approve of a certain government’s behavior, and that government’s leaders will not respond to sanctions and the threat of prosecution, they will be attacked militarily.
We had a tie this week between two must read entries in our non-Council category. One was Michael Yon’s harsh critique of a sensationalist piece on Afghanistan entitled Calling BULLSHIT on Rolling Stone and the other was a fascinating piece on the cultural dilemma between the West and the Islamic world called Saving 1 Billion People from Themselves.
As is mandated in these circumstances, I broke the tie. While I thoroughly enjoyed Yon’s snark, Sultan Knish’s piece embraced some deeper questions and got my nod for this week.
Here are this week’s full results:
- *First place with 3 2/3 votes! New Zeal – “Responsibility to Protect” – The End of National Sovereignty As We Know It?
- Second place with 2 2/3 votes – VA Right! – Another Parody Video From Va Right! “Just Like a Real War” Music Performed by Tom White
- Third place *t* with 1 vote – The Colossus Of Rhodey – Declaring war vs. “authorizations”: “Legal” conflicts and the War Powers Act
- Third place *t* with 1 vote – Joshuapundit – A Message For The Tribe
- Fourth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Bookworm Room – Yes, There Is An Obama Doctrine
- Fourth place *t* with 2/3 vote – The Noisy Room – Preemptive Anarchy
- Fourth place *t* with 2/3 votes – The Razor – The Road To Hell Pt. 2
- Fourth place *t* with 2/3 vote – The Political Commentator – Is religion headed towards extinction?
- Fourth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Right Truth – Grains Of Sand: The Fall Of Neve Dekalim
- Fourth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Simply Jews – Iran Plans To Introduce Clean Web
- Fifth place *t* with 1/3 vote – Rhymes With Right – Is It Time To Impeach Obama?
- Fifth place *t* with 1/3 vote – The Glittering Eye – Reading Up On Hyperinflation
- First place with 3 2/3 votes! – Sultan Knish – Saving 1 Billion People From Themselves submitted by Right Truth
- Second place with 2 2/3 votes – Michael Yon – Calling BULLSHIT on Rolling Stone submitted by Bookworm Room
- Third place with 2 votes – Flopping Aces – The Real reason We’re Bombing Libya submitted by Rhymes With Right
- Fourth place *t* with 1 vote – Via Meadia – Black And Blue 2: Blacks Flee Blue States In Droves submitted by The Glittering Eye
- Fourth place *t* with 1 vote – Raymond Ibrahim – Weeping And Other Hysterics; Have Muslim Apologists Nothing More to Offer? submitted by The Watcher
- Fourth place *t* with 1 vote – Melanie Phillips – Humpty in Toytown and the Arab Boomerang submitted by The Watcher
- Fifth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Right, Wing–Nut! – Pakistani Actress rips Muslim Cleric A New One… submitted by GrEaT sAtAn”S gIrLfRiEnD
- Fifth place *t* with 2/3 vote – IMAO – Know Thy Enemy: The Middle East submitted by The Razor
- Fifth place *t* with 2/3 vote – WorldNet Daily – Libya bombing an attempt to create ‘New World Order’? submitted by The Noisy Room
- Sixth place *t* with 1/3 vote – RBO – RBO News & views – the Dumb War Edition submitted by New Zeal
- Sixth place *t* with 1/3 vote – Pajamas Media – Drunkblogging Obama’s Speech submitted by The Political Commentator
See you next week!
Walmart has gone progressive and Marxist as far as I am concerned. I was shocked by this video – no wonder they are becoming patsies for DHS. Either they drank the government propaganda koolaid or they are groveling to the government. Rights to low food prices? Food deserts? Equalize pricing? How very commie of Walmart. Someone hand the guy a napkin… He’s drooling social justice all over Americans.
U.S. consumers face “serious” inflation in the months ahead for clothing, food and other products, the head of Wal-Mart’s U.S. operations warned Wednesday.
Still, inflation is “going to be serious,” Wal-Mart U.S. CEO Bill Simon said during a meeting with USA TODAY’s editorial board. “We’re seeing cost increases starting to come through at a pretty rapid rate.”