By: Mischa Popoff
Policy Advisor for The Heartland Institute
Research Associate for The Frontier Centre for Public Policy
Want to know the real reason Clark wants a bigger share of the Enbridge Pipeline deal?
Start by wrapping your brain around the fact that 750 public-sector employees earn more than $200,000 a year in this province, with top wages approaching a cool million. And they’re all in line to receive gold-plated, indexed pensions, with full benefits, ‘til the day they, or their spouses, die.
If they all retired right now, they’d drain over $200 million per annum out of the province’s treasury (which is empty by the way) in exchange for doing nothing. That’s $200 million a year for just 750 people, barely enough to fill a high-school gymnasium shoulder to shoulder. And the rest of us have to pay for that.
These people must be the exceptions to the rule. Right? La crème de la crème of the province’s public sector? Surely most civil servants in this province earn more modest wages, something in the neighbourhood of a teacher’s starting salary of just $47,000. Right?
With a whopping 64,000 public servants in B.C., it’s not where they start that matters, it’s where they end up just before they retire that costs us.
Teachers in this province earn $74,000 a year after just eight years on the job. And that’s assuming they only have a basic education degree. If they hold a second degree, a master’s or PhD, they receive more. And no matter how many degrees they hold they all get steady annual raises until they retire, at which point they start getting 70% of their salary, or more, plus ALL benefits, indexed to inflation, for the rest of their or their spouse’s life.
Get out your calculator…
A single teacher can easily cost this province as much as $2 million while working, and another $3 million in retirement! Add those numbers together, then multiply by 64,000, and you’ll begin to see what’s motivating Clark to ignore Canada’s British North America Act of 1867.
Never mind this province’s current debt, hovering around an unsettling $51 billion. We’re on the hook to dish out over $320 billion (that’s $320,000,000,000) over the next few decades. Somehow, I don’t think tourism is going to cover that. And so, Clark wants a bigger share of Alberta’s wealth so she can, in Barack Obama’s words, “Spread it around” to civil servants.
Never mind that this province’s public sector currently costs taxpayers more than $3 billion across 90 mostly useless government agencies. Never mind that public-sector wages and benefits far exceed anything you’ll ever get in the private sector. Never mind that public-sector employees work shorter hours and retire earlier than anyone in the private sector. And, last but not least, never mind that the private sector GENERATES wealth while the public sector does not, cannot, and, in fact, ABSORBS wealth like Bounty paper towels absorb a juice spill on your kitchen floor.
Yeah, just never mind all that. The big hit to the treasury (which again I remind you is empty) is yet to come.
Historically, only military personnel qualified for government pensions. They had, after all, served the rest of us in a most literal sense. Politicians left whatever they were doing in the private sector to “serve” in public office, and public-sector employees gave up the highs and lows of private-sector employment in exchange for job security.
But today, thanks to a perverse laxity in negotiating with public-sector unions by politicians who receive campaign contributions from those same unions, we now watch as teachers work less than 190 days a year and as public servants in general take full retirement after pushing paper for just a quarter century, or less.
Everyone in the private sector works hard to fund their retirement. Then we all work even harder to fund the public-sector’s retirements. No wonder Clark has her eye on Alberta’s pie.
Mischa Popoff is a freelance political writer with a degree in history