10/31/12

We Air Honest Ads, Black Detroit Host Gets Outraged.

By: Lloyd Marcus

Patriots, we are still on the road on the Rebuild America Defeat Obama bus tour. It has been over a month and Mary really misses Sammy, our greyhound and Marilyn her cat. I miss Sammy, but not the cat.

Anyway, I was interviewed on the morning drive talk radio show, Inside Detroit with Mildred Gaddis. The liberal black host and her callers were pretty PO-ed at me for being a black man chairing the Campaign To Defeat Barack Obama.

They began the interview by airing our Barack Obama’s Legacy of Failure ad.

The host attacked me claiming that fact checkers confirm that our ad is full of lies. Of course, I defended our ad as being dead on target and that her so-called “fact-checkers” were Obama sycophant hacks. Well, things went down hill from there. Enraged callers chimed in with “Mr. Marcus, I am sooooo angry at you!

To their credit, we battled for three segments on the radio without the host or her furious callers calling me a “stupid n—–,” which normally happens when I challenge the left’s rhetoric. Still, the interview was quite heated and compelling. The producer wanted to keep me for a fourth segment but, I had to get ready for “bus call” to our first rally of the day in Kalamazoo, MI.

While sparring with the black host and her black callers, I received a revelation; truth and facts did not matter. They were so consumed in their racial bias that Obama’s black-skin trumps everything. I was blown away that they could not see the immorality of voting for Obama solely because he was black. The host called loyalty to Obama a matter of black pride. I got it. These racist people cannot be changed. They simply must be defeated.

The host asked where the money came from for our TV ads. Talking about tossing me a softball, I proudly informed Mildred that our funding comes from “the people,” not the Republican party.

Originally, we planned to tour the country. But, polling convinced us that our efforts to get Romney/Ryan elected would best be served touring Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Iowa.

New polling data reaffirms the importance of these states including a new poll commissioned by the FOX TV affiliate in Detroit, Michigan, which shows Mitt Romney has surged to a tie with Barack Obama in Michigan – it was only in September that Obama had led by 14 points: http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/19905504/michigan-poll-obama-and-romney-in-dead-heat.

I am proud to say that the efforts of our “Rebuild America – Defeat Obama” tour team has contributed to the Romney/Ryan surge. We have made several swings through the Upper and Lower Peninsulas of Michigan, airing TV ads, radio ads, publishing newspaper ads and doing interviews with the press.

Here’s one of the dozens of successful rallies we’ve held across Michigan:

Part of the reason our efforts are having such a profound impact on Michigan is that Barack Obama’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee have taken this state for granted – so much so that they haven’t aired a single TV ad in the state during the 2012 general election for president: http://www.nationaljournal.com/hotline/ad-spending-in-presidential-battleground-states-20120620.

When the producer of Inside Detroit requested an interview, I knew their goal was to discredit me and portray me as a traitorous black, paid-off by the Republicans.

Candidly, I prayed before the interview asking God for wisdom to deliver whatever he wanted me to give listeners. Despite the host and callers ganging up on me, I am confident that somebody in Mildred’s mostly black radio audience thought, “That man is right. It is racist to vote for Obama solely because he is black like me.”

I have peace that I was where I was supposed to be doing what God wanted me to do.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
http://www.campaigntodefeatobama.com/rebuild-america-tour/
LloydMarcus.com

10/31/12

MSM has ‘joined’ Obama campaign in ‘Last Stand’

By: Jeffrey Klein
Political Buzz Examiner

The mainstream media (MSM) has not only lowered the ‘veil’ on their Liberal bias in reporting for the 2012 General Election, it could be easily argued that they have taken an affirmative role in the reelection campaign of President Barack Obama, because all ‘parities’ recognize that it may represent their ‘Last Stand.’

‘Last Stand’ is a military situation, representing a tactic of last resort, wherein a body of troops believes that the defending its’ position in the face of overwhelming odds, offers a greater benefit than the risk of retreat or surrender.

In this case, the ‘body of troops’ are represented by President Obama’s administration and the MSM, who appear to have ‘affirmatively’ formed a ‘covenant of self-protection’ sometime in the year 2006.

Their ‘position,’ is the retention of the Obama Administration in office, with the sole goat to maintain the power to subvert and otherwise ‘neutralize’ the tsunami of facts and evidence, resulting from the avalanche of their indiscretions and scandals over their first term–and the acts of commission and omission in reporting by their accomplices in the MSM.

Finally, the ‘benefit,’ is their freedom, and in come cases, their continued existence.

For many of the members of the Obama Administration, perhaps even the president himself, , when all of the facts and evidence are finally uncovered, prosecutions would occur and convictions obtained, which, like in the case of Watergate, result in prison terms and the disgraceful end of careers.

In the case of the broadcast MSM, the penalty for them having substantially violated their obligation to the general public, to perform honest, objective and vigorous investigation and reporting, many would suffer a complete demise.

The loss of credibility would cause a mass exodus of viewers for many, resulting in financial bankruptcy liquidation–making them a casualty to their causative ‘moral bankruptcy.’

Too bad for President Obama and the MSM that history clearly chronicles that the defensive force in a last stand always suffers very heavy casualties and then, because it is cornered and runs out of ‘defensive capabilities,’ it is usually completely destroyed–just like in Custer’s Last Stand.

The most damaging scandal of corruption plaguing Barack Obama is Benghazi-gate, wherein four Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador, were murdered during a [surprise] terrorist attack in Libya on September 11, 2012.

And seven weeks later, right before the election, he claims he is still not able to tell the American people–what he knew, when and what he did or did not do–which he obviously knows for fact.

But amazingly, this is the same President Obama, whose global intelligence network and military apparatus allowed him to ‘watch in real time’ the actual Navy SEAL operation in Pakistan that killed Usama bin Laden, which resulted in cornucopia of information, images and video flooding the front page and broadcasts of every media outlet in the world, within hours, heralding the ‘courageous’ American Commander-in-Chief, with photos of he and Hillary Clinton focused on it while sitting in the ‘White House Situation Room.’

Unfortunately for Barack Obama and the MSM, even though the so-called ‘internal investigations’ won’t be delivered until after November 6, 2012, enough American’s are smart enough to understand that you can’t have it both ways, and they will be the victor at Barack Obama’s ‘Last Stand.’

10/31/12

Nuclear Iran Seeks Apocalyptic Holy Man

By: Sharon Sebastian
Website: www.DarwinsRacists.com

President Barack Obama knows who the enemy is. September 11, 2012 was clear evidence that the killing of Osama Bin Laden was not a fait accompli when it comes to ending the terrorist threat. Obama is reluctant to admit that radical Islam’s open declaration of war presents a danger to America. The state of Israel shows no such hesitancy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently stood before the United Nations and warned of a medieval war of civilizations that is set to erupt global security. A nuclear armed Iran is far different, Netanyahu pointed out, than a nuclear armed Russia. Netanyahu emphasized the distinction between the two ideologies of Iran and Soviet Russia:

“Militant Jihadists behave very differently from Secular Marxists. There were no Soviet suicide bombers. Yet, Iran produces hordes of them. Deterrence worked with the Soviets because every time Soviets chose between their ideology and survival, they chose survival. But, deterrence may not work with Iranians when they get their nuclear weapons.”

Netanyahu went on to explain that the difference between the two aggressors is the value placed on life. Iran anticipates its own destruction as a price to pay for bombing the globe into chaos:

“A great scholar of the Middle East, Bernard Lewis, put it best: ‘For the Ayatollahs of Iran, mutual assured destruction is not a deterrent, it’s an inducement. Iran’s apocalyptic leaders believe that a medieval Holy Man will reappear in the wake of a devastating holy war, thereby insuring that their brand of radical Islam will rule the earth.’ Now, that’s not just what they believe, that is what is guiding their policies and their actions.”

Americans and nations worldwide must recognize the seriousness and inflexibility of Iran’s goal towards mutual destruction and the Obama administration’s role to date in the rapidly developing global crisis. Inexplicably to many, Barack Obama unleashed uprisings in the Middle East while implementing a radical Socialist agenda to “transform America” back home.

The overall intent is not as bifurcated as it may appear. The radical Islamists are waging a war of religion while the radical left is waging a war of ideas. The mutual goal is the toppling of a republic based, Judeo-Christian founded and Constitutionally-grounded America. Jihadists want America to become an Islamic state like Iran, whereas the left wants a “transformation of America” to a Socialist nation. Both systems devour individual rights and freedoms. Key to both movements is total elimination of all belief systems counter to their own. Were they to succeed, as natural enemies, Islamists and Socialists will eventually target one another. Radical Islam condemns to death all that reject a belief in Allah. Socialists constitute much of America’s Progressive-Left and have consistently legislated God out of American society, seeking to become god to the masses.

President Obama is the titular head of the Progressive-Left. President Obama understands Islam having studied the Koran in Indonesia. Part of the curriculum was that The Twelfth Imam or 12th Mahdi is the Islamic savior — its Islamic messiah. Islam requires that in order for the 12th Imam to reveal himself, the world must be in global war. Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reportedly believes that he has the divine mission to “hasten the return” of the 12th Mahdi. Destroying Israel, then America — erupts the world into the chaos needed for the Mahdi’s return.

Some 600 years before Islam, Christ appeared during His first coming as God-incarnate. The Christian Messiah is the Savior Jesus Christ. Islam reveres Jesus as a lesser prophet and not God, which puts Islam at inextricable odds with Christianity. Iranian President Ahmadinejad believes the “Mahdi” or “Twelfth Imam” will appear publicly during a time of great disaster, with Jesus at his side, to bring peace to a war-torn world. It is said that the 12th Mahdi will take Jesus to Mecca to replace the Bible with the Koran so that Christians worldwide will convert to Islam. A “Muslim anti-Christ” is also to surface in the world and falsely convince Jews that he is their “Jesus the Messiah” that they have long awaited.

An “Islamic Jesus,” it is said, will kill all Jews and behead anyone worldwide who does not accept Islam as the only true religion. The Islamic Mahdi will set-up his kingdom in Jerusalem, establish a worldwide Caliphate, along with Shariah Law, and rule the world. Homosexuals will be killed and women will remain as property and oppressed. Such belief is a driving force of today’s war on non-Islamic nations; an ancient war based on fundamental Islam that has entrenched the globe in a war on terror. Those who identify themselves as moderate Muslims declare that only extremists hold such beliefs.

The funding by Iran of the upheaval in the Middle East, the positioning of radical Muslim groups in governments across the region from Lebanon to Egypt cannot simply be dismissed as a war of ideologies between the West and the Muslim world. By Ahmadinejad’s admission, Iran’s role in the turmoil in the Middle East is to set the stage for the return of the 12th Imam. Obama’s years studying Islam should have taught him that he cannot schmooze leaders like Ahmadinejad, gain their favor, and unmoor them from what they believe is the only reason they exist on the planet. Islamic radicals seek world chaos targeting first Israel and then the United States. For Barack Obama to in anyway diminish the radical Islamist threat prioritizes his personally held biases that jeopardize America’s safety.

Netanyahu has recognized the danger and has openly warned of it for more than 15 years:

“Shockingly, some people have begun to peddle the absurd notion that a nuclear armed Iran would actually stabilize the Middle East. Yeah, right. That’s like saying a nuclear armed Al-Qaeda would usher in an era of universal peace. I speak about it now because the Iranian nuclear calendar does not wait for anyone or anything. I speak about it now because the hour is getting late, very late. I speak about it now because when it comes to the survival of my country, it is not only my right to speak, but my duty to speak. And, I believe that this is the duty of every responsible [world] leader who wants to preserve peace.”

Netanyahu warned that it is not just Israel and the United States, but the world at large that is being targeted:

“Militant Islam has many branches – from the rulers of Iran with their Revolutionary Guards to Al Qaeda terrorists to the radical cells lurking in every part of the globe. But, despite their differences, they are all rooted in the same bitter soil of intolerance. That intolerance is directed first at their fellow Muslims, and then to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, secular people, anyone who doesn’t submit to their unforgiving creed.”

Sharon Sebastian’s insights on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdZHzMG66Kg

Sharon Sebastian (www.DarwinsRacists.com) is an author, writer, and contributor to various forms of media including cultural and political broadcasts, print, and online websites. In addition to the heated global debate on creation vs. evolution, her second book, Darwin’s Racists – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, highlights the impact of Social Darwinism’s Marxist/Socialist underpinnings on the culture, the faith and current policy out of Washington. Critics are calling Darwin’s Racists – “Incredibly Timely” and “A Book for our Times.” Sebastian’s political and cultural analyses are published nationally and internationally. Website: www.DarwinsRacists.com. “Darwin’s Racists – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow” may be ordered at: www.DarwinsRacists.com, www.Amazon.com, www.BarnesandNoble.com and at bookstores online and worldwide. Sharon Sebastian’s insights on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdZHzMG66Kg

10/31/12

What is Mitt Romney doing about Benghazi? Here’s What (video)

By: Arlen Williams
Gulag Bound

I’ve been wondering what in the world Mitt Romney is or is not doing, regarding the Benghazi debacle and what he is having to do regarding its heinous backstory. More on the latter, later.

From two bomb blasts by the Republican side last night and one, today, it appears he is willing to fight a proxy war to challenge Obama’s deviance. These came via Fox News, from Newt Gingrich, former Assistant Secretary of Defense Bing West, and former Attorney General and official Romney team member, Michael Mukasey. I suggest listening closely, to all three recaps. Republicans speaking out at such a time may be considered surrogates for Romney, directly or indirectly, with or without plausible deniability — and the Romney campaign knows it.

Gingrich: at 9:27 Greta brings up Benghazi

Daily Caller’s transcription:

“There is a rumor — I want to be clear, it’s a rumor — that at least two networks have emails from the National Security Adviser’s office telling a counterterrorism group to stand down,” Gingrich said. “But they were a group in real-time trying to mobilize marines and C-130s and the fighter aircraft, and they were told explicitly by the White House stand down and do nothing. This is not a terrorist action. If that is true, and I’ve been told this by a fairly reliable U.S. senator, if that is true and comes out, I think it raises enormous questions about the president’s role, and Tom Donilon, the National Security Adviser’s role, the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, who has taken it on his own shoulders, that he said don’t go. And that is, I think, very dubious, given that the president said he had instructions they are supposed to do everything they could to secure American personnel.”

West and Mukasey bring the executive branch side of GOP gravitas to bear and show that Republican pols and Romney are asking some of the right questions – the ones about what happened during and after 9-11-2012.

West



Mukasey

The facts are building and building. It could now be called the Benghazi Bubble. And the corrupt failure of all but a trickle-down of journalism coming from the Marxstream media is now contributing to the bubble effect. Oops, they haven’t even been spoon feeding us enough!

But the most critical elements of the Benghazi travesty will not be dealt with, if the investigation is done between globalist, neo-Marxist Democrats and globalist, semi-fascist Republicans. Even beyond the weapons handling and dealings involved, the fact finding must deal with the U.S. involvement in Arab Spring, the plans of “Civil Society,” and the use of the doctrines of “Right to Protect.”

There are hands elephantine as well as asinine in those dirty dealings.

As always, for more from the Gulag on Benghazi, use our tag, among those shown below: “Benghazi.”

10/31/12

John Merline on “Obamanomics: Fact and Fiction”

Accuracy in Media

John Merline, Senior Writer for Investor’s Business Daily, spoke last month at the AIM conference, “ObamaNation: A Day of Truth.” He accused the media of helping to sell President Obama’s economic arguments to the public. Merline was previously a senior director for AOL, and an editorial writer at USA Today.

Merline challenged several of Obama’s claims about the economy, such as his claim to have stopped the Second Great Depression; his claim that a slow recovery was inevitable; that “We can’t go back to the failed policies of the past;” and that “Bush was this great deregulator, that he deregulated the economy and that’s why everybody went crazy, and greed took over.” Merline countered these with facts from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, not partisan assessments, and makes a compelling case that the economic success story that Obama likes to tell is built on lies and false assumptions.

You can watch highlights of his speech here:

Or you can watch his entire speech here, or with a transcript here.

10/31/12

Washington Post Finds Racism Behind Romney Surge

By: Cliff Kincaid
Accuracy in Media

On Friday, October 26, and the following Monday, October 29, The Washington Post resorted to the race card in order to drum up support for Barack Obama. If Obama doesn’t get more white votes, as reflected in current polls, he will go down to defeat on November 6.

“The erosion of support Obama has experienced since his muted performance in the first presidential debate has been particularly acute among white men, whites without college degrees and white independents, the new tracking poll found,” the paper said.

The Post is worried. Its strategy is to accuse whites of racism for opposing Obama’s second term.

The first article noted that white people were overwhelmingly for Mitt Romney. The second article said Obama was desperately trying to appeal to white people but they were leaving him anyway.

In the first story, which carried the print edition headline, “Whites’ support for Obama eroding,” the paper said there was no way to tell “what role, if any, racial prejudice may play on either side of the racial gap. But the data suggest that concern about the economy is amplifying the division, as Obama’s decline in support among white voters appears to be closely linked to views of his handling of the economy. And yet minorities have suffered severe unemployment and housing foreclosures in the current economy as well.”

In other words, blacks are sticking with Obama despite the bad economy. So perhaps the racism lies with some of those backing Obama. But the Post can’t acknowledge or see that. The focus of the piece was on whites being racist, even though the paper admits that white support is declining for Obama because he has mismanaged the economy.

The second article, “Obama struggles to balance African Americans’ hopes with country’s as a whole,” by Peter Wallsten, continues the cover-up of Obama’s black racist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist Party operative. Wallsten refers to Obama’s Harvard law professor Charles Ogletree as Obama’s “mentor,” though Ogletree came along far later in Obama’s life, after Obama had already been indoctrinated by Davis.

The Post clearly understands that stories about a communist influencing Obama as he was growing up in Hawaii would not sit well with voters, if the relationship were to be exposed and investigated. Hence, it must be covered up. As a result, Davis has been replaced as “mentor” by Ogletree.

Professor Paul Kengor wrote a book on Davis entitled The Communist, which also examines the Davis-Obama relationship. The Post will not review or comment on the book.

I recently taped an interview with Kengor in his office at Grove City College in Pennsylvania and asked him about the bias of the Post and other “mainstream media” organs in protecting Obama. He said they subordinate journalism to their political ideology, in this case the cause of making sure Obama gets re-elected.

“They’re political partisans first and then journalists second,” he said. “They are not truly fair journalists. They are not good journalists.”

Obama had referred to Davis as just “Frank” in his memoir, Dreams from My Father, and all references to “Frank” were eliminated from the audio version of the book.

Kengor said, “You’ll be reading a hard copy of Dreams from My Father and you’ll go down, line after line…you’re listening to it on the audio…here comes the Frank Marshall Davis paragraph—boom—it just skips. It goes right over it. That’s a jarring thing.”

The audio version was released in 2005, 10 years after the print version was published.

Kengor says the media don’t want to know or report the truth about Obama, or why Obama would cover up his link to a communist agent for Moscow.

In its attack on white voters deserting Obama, the Post reported, “Obama rarely discusses his innermost feelings about being the first African American to occupy the Oval Office, according to friends and associates, preferring to keep his thoughts closely held, shared with only a select few.”

Perhaps this is because Obama has Frank Marshall Davis to thank for his “innermost thoughts.” We discussed this subject in our report, “Reason to Hate: Barack Obama’s Racist Roots.” We noted, “Obama’s own book, Dreams from My Father, talks about asking ‘Frank’ for advice when his white grandmother had been accosted by a black panhandler. Davis told Obama that his grandmother was right to be scared and that ‘She understands that black people have reason to hate.’”

We pointed out that the evidence shows that Davis was a black racist who saw sinister white plots in the foreign policies of the United States and other Western nations.

In order to drive the point home that whites are racist if they are against Obama, the Post ran another story, “Poll: Majority prejudiced against blacks,” on October 28. The survey found that “a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.”

Notice the phrase “whether they recognize those feelings or not.” In other words, the AP’s “experts on race” alone determined if you are racist or not. There was no objective measure used to determine the outcome.

In this completely subjective survey, people were asked questions about whether they believed that Obama was a socialist, a foreigner, or a Christian. The answers factored into whether someone was a racist or not.

Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org.