Hat Tip: BB
Hat Tip: BB
The Amir Tadros Coptic church in Minya, some 250 kilometers south of Cairo, was set ablaze on August 14, 2013. (Getty Images)
Once again, the Council has spoken, the votes have been cast and we have the results for this week’s Watcher’s Council match-up.
“A lie can go halfway around the world before the truth can even put its pants on.” – Mark Twain
This week’s winner, Joshuapundit’s What The Media Won’t Tell You About What’s Really Going On In Egypt, is my look at the context and the reality of what’s occurring in Egypt as opposed to the narrative pushed by the Obama Administration and the legacy media. Here’s a slice:
I wrote yesterday that after doing a great deal to destabilize Egypt, President Obama appeared to finally be doing something right for a change…keeping his mouth shut (at least publicly)and concentrating on his golf game.
I should have known better.
Our Dear Leader took some time off from the links to run his mouth, condemning Egypt’s declaring a state of emergency, saying what he termed ‘traditional cooperation’ could not continue, and announcing the cancellation of planned joint exercises between our military and Egypt’s.
He also got busy behind the scenes to protect his Muslim Brotherhood pals. President Obama reportedly put in a direct call to Egypt’s Defense Minister Gen. Abdel-Fattah El-Sissi, the military leader behind the ousting of Mahmoud Morsi and the Brotherhood.
He undoubtedly planned to threaten him again with losing the $1.5 billion in aid we give Egypt and to demand again that he free Morsi and the other Brotherhood leaders now in custody. Perhaps our Islamist friendly president is worried that a trial of Morsi and the Brotherhood’s Number 2 Khairat el Shater is likely to result in this embarrassing item coming to light.
Al-Sissi refused to take the call.Instead, the president was told politely that the right person for him to speak to was Egypt’s interim president Adly Mansour. Obama recognized the insult when he heard it and decided not to bother talking to Mansour.
There’s a great deal of verbiage in the legacy media calling al-Sissi a ‘Nasser-type figure’. Nothing could be further from the truth. Instead of being a quasi-Marxist, loud mouth Arab fantasist like the Rais, al-Sissi is a quasi-Islamist, pragmatic, career military general who was smart enough to attend war colleges in both the UK and America and has relationships with army figures in both countries.
Having seen what President Obama is like and whom Obama’s in bed with, al-Sissi simply doesn’t trust him. Nor does he perceive any need to.
What’s going on in Egypt is not some kind of Tien-an-min Square but the creation of another front in Islam’s civil war, and it has a direct link to what’s going on right now in Syria.
The Saudis, the Emirates and the other GCE countries wrote off our president a long time ago as a clueless, arrogant and deceptive loser. They realize he’s incapable of dealing with the threat from Shi’ite Iran, Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood, which in Egypt particularly had been cozying up to the Ayatollahs. In spite of their theological differences, the Brotherhood and the Iranians agree on the hatred of the west and the Islamist concept of theocracy, the vilayat e fiqh.
In our non-Council category, the winner was Walter Russel Mead in Via Meadea with Bambi Meets Godzilla in the Middle East, submitted by The Razor. It’s a look at what Mead sees as the reality of Barack Obama’s Middle East strategy and an analysis of it’s failure.
Okay, here are this week’s full results. Only The Mellow Jihadi was unable to vote this week, but was not subject to the usual 2/3 vote penalty:
- *First place with 3 2/3 votes! – Joshuapundit – What The Media Won’t Tell You About What’s Really Going On In Egypt
- Second place with 3 1/3 votes – The Noisy Room – Torture and Murder in Tennessee – Why No Movement for These Innocents?
- Third place with 2 votes – The Razor – Elementary School Math
- Fourth place with 1 1/3 votes – The Right Planet – Obama Awards Presidential Medal of Freedom to Bayard Rustin, a Socialist
- Fifth place *t* with 1 vote – The Glittering Eye – Life in a Dog Pack: Old Age
- Fifth place *t* with 1 vote – Nice Deb – TX Congressman on NAACP Request For Rodeo Clown Probe: ‘We Can’t Even Get the DOJ to look at Benghazi!’
- Sixth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Simply Jews – Erdogan’s shocker: Tzipi Livni and Bernard-Henri Levy deposed Morsi
- Seventh place *t* with 1/3 vote – The Mellow Jihadi – The Art of Caring
- Seventh place *t* with 1/3 vote – GrEaT sAtAn”S gIrLfRiEnD – Foreign Policy Playbook
- *First place with 2 1/3 votes! – Via Medea – Bambi Meets Godzilla in the Middle East submitted by The Razor
- Second place with 2 votes – Mark Steyn – Consensus in Egypt submitted by Joshuapundit
- Third place *t* with 1 2/3 votes – Sultan Knish – The Brotherhood’s Currency of Blood submitted by The Noisy Room
- Third place with 1 2/3 votes – Danger Room – How to Fix the Army: Sack All the Generals submitted by The Mellow Jihadi
- Fourth place *t* with 1 vote – Daniel Greenfield – Whose side is Obama on? submitted by The Political Commentator
- Fourth place *t* with 1 votes – Kevin D. Williamson/National Review – The Front Man submitted by The Right Planet
- Fifth place *t* with 2/3 vote – The Passing Parade – Phoniness and how to achieve it… submitted by Simply Jews
- Fifth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Stately McDaniel Manor – Warning: Warning Shots submitted by Bookworm Room
- Fifth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Zero Hedge – Is China Doomed? submitted by The Watcher
- Fifth place *t* with 2/3 vote – John Hayward/The Conversation – The Rodeo Clown Police understand the power of contempt submitted by Nice Deb
- Fifth place *t* with 2/3 vote – Joshua Foust – The Miranda Detention: Troubling from all Sides submitted by The Glittering Eye
- Sixth place *t* with 1/3 vote – Michael Ledeen – The Shape of the Global War submitted by GrEaT sAtAn”S gIrLfRiEnD
- Sixth place *t* with 1/3 vote – The College Conservative – TCC’s Guide for Back-To-Campus submitted by Rhymes With Right
- Sixth place *t* with 1/3 vote – Andrew Klaven – The Sad Fate Of Democrat Women submitted by The Watcher
See you next week! Don’t forget to tune in on Monday AM for this week’s Watcher’s Forum, as the Council and their invited special guests take apart one of the provocative issues of the day with short takes and weigh in… don’t you dare miss it. And don’t forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter… ’cause we’re cool like that!
By: Trevor Loudon
By: Roger Aronoff
Accuracy in Media
The Nidal Hasan trial is coming to a close. After the prosecution called 89 witnesses, Hasan, defending himself, called none, and on Wednesday, August 21st, stated three words: “The defense rests.” The judge said that if Hasan had taken the stand, she “would have ordered the jury to disregard any statements he would make to a religiously motivated attack.”
A troubled jihadist who had foresworn his oath to his country embarks on a shooting spree at Fort Hood, killing 13 and wounding 32, allegedly grinning while he guns down military personnel. A woman screams, “my baby, my baby, my baby!” before she dies. “I could see the blood, the crumpled uniforms I assumed were soldiers,” said one eyewitness of the incident.
For the if-it-bleeds-it-leads media, it seems awfully strange how silent the media have been about the story of Major Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter. Now, the Associated Press has dared to print that the motives of this killer—who has fully admitted to shooting the victims—are finally being explored during his trial.
“The prosecutors pursuing the death penalty against the Army psychiatrist accused in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage will soon begin trying to answer a difficult but key question: Why did Maj. Nidal Hasan attack his fellow soldiers in the worst mass shooting ever on a U.S. military base?” wrote authors Nomaan Merchant and Michael Graczyk in their piece, “Prosecutors getting to motive in Fort Hood trial.”
“Both sides offered a few hints so far.”
What about hints about the motives of the media? The coverage, in general, has been largely muted. While the American public was treated to every detail of the Trayvon Martin case, Hasan’s attempts to maintain his notoriety by leaking documents to the mainstream media have been treated with less enthusiasm than the hunt for racism was in George Zimmerman’s life. The first case has more substantiation; the accounts of Zimmerman’s supposed racism were proven to be false.
Hasan, who is representing himself at trial, has offered more than a hint about his jihadist outlook. “Hasan is said to have shouted the jihadist battle cry ‘Allahu Akbar’ (God is great) as he opened fire on his Army comrades,” writes William R. Hawkins for Family Security Matters. “But it was his earlier alleged claim that he thought of himself as a Muslim more than an American that is the real key.”
Hasan also sent a letter to Fox News exploring his views. Another letter, to the Killeen Daily Herald (KDH News), outlines his motive for the November 5, 2009 shootings: “I was defending my religion.”
“It is one thing for the United States to say ‘We don’t want Shariah (God’s) law to govern us’ but its [sic] not acceptable to have a foreign policy that tries to replace Shariah law for a more secular form of government,” the accused Fort Hood shooter wrote to KDH News.
“The rhetoric is nothing new to Hasan, who after years of silence suddenly announced in court he carried out the Fort Hood shooting to protect Mullah Mohammed Omar and the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,” reported KDH News. Members of al Qaeda currently swear allegiance to Mohammed Omar.
If anyone has any question about whether Hasan’s actions were premeditated, consider this: He has admitted to the killings, wants to die as a martyr, and even divested himself of most of his possessions immediately before the Fort Hood shooting. “On May 31, 2009, Hasan sent [al Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula Anwar al-] Awlaki an email asking for the cleric’s views on suicide attacks. Hasan wrote [that] a suicide attack on the enemy on the eve of battle would be akin to a soldier jumping on a grenade to prevent the death of comrades,” reported KDH News. “Over seven months, he sent Awlaki 15 emails and messages.”
Hasan’s motives really aren’t being explored at trial—they’re being covered up by the actions of the judge. “A military judge blocked several key pieces of evidence Monday that prosecutors said would explain the mindset of the soldier accused in the 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, including his belief that he had a ‘jihad duty’ to carry out the attack,” reported the Associated Press on August 19. “Prosecutors had asked the judge to approve several witnesses and various evidence to support what they allege motivated Maj. Nidal Hasan to kill 13 people and wound more than 30 others at the Texas military base. But the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, blocked nearly all of it.”
KDH News, which has proven to be an excellent resource of news about the trial, offered more details: “The presiding judge in Maj. Nidal Hasan’s court-martial ruled today the prosecution cannot use presentations Hasan created that may have shown sympathy toward Islamic extremism.” They added that “Judge Col. Tara Osborn ruled the presentations, authored while Hasan was in medical residency and in a fellowship years before the Nov. 5, 2009, shooting, were too far removed from the actual incident to be considered.”
As KDH News had earlier reported, Hasan authored a study known as “Grand Rounds,” the first draft of which “suggested revenge might be a motive for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and highlighted portions of the Quran he argued may justify the killing of non-Muslims.” And, he gave a presentation in August 2007 titled “Is the War on Terror a War on Islam: An Islamic Perspective?” that “theorized the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were wars against Islam and gave a hypothetical defense of Osama bin Laden.” Is it any surprise that the bipartisan Senate Report, “A Ticking Time Bomb,” concludes that “Evidence of Hasan’s radicalization to violent Islamist extremism was on full display to his superiors and colleagues during his military medical training?”
These are facts the judge considers irrelevant to the case, just as the Defense Department considers awarding Purple Hearts to the victims prejudicial, sending a message that the government has already decided Hasan’s guilt.
“Speciously, military prosecutors are arguing that granting Purple Heart awards to the wounded victims would somehow prejudice Major Hasan’s upcoming trial because it would be tantamount to a branch of the government rendering a judgment that he is a terrorist and therefore already criminally culpable,” wrote Andrew McCarthy. “If they are capable of shame, administration officials ought to be ashamed by this frivolous claim, which dishonors not only Hasan’s victims but also the military justice system itself.”
It’s hard to defend a case where the defendant so clearly wants to be found guilty and to receive the death penalty. “Standby defense lawyer Lieutenant Colonel Kris Poppe told the court on Wednesday he believed Hasan was actively seeking the death penalty and that the defense lawyers’ code of ethics prevented them from assisting,” reported Reuters on August 8. The judge, Col. Osborn, “denied a request by his standby defense lawyers to reduce their role,” reported Reuters.
Col. Osborn replaced Col. Gregory Gross, the prior judge, because it appeared the he was “biased against Hasan,” reported the Associated Press in April. “The court also tossed out Gross’ order to have Hasan’s beard forcibly shaved before his court-martial, though it didn’t rule on whether the order violated his religious rights as he claimed.” Osborn ruled Hasan’s beard a “voluntary choice.” NBC 5 Investigates outlined the sundry preferential treatment that Hasan has received since his arrest, including the fact that he has received nearly $300,000 in salary, since he hasn’t yet been convicted of anything.
Other evidence that Osborn won’t allow at trial has included three pages from his 2010 sanity board review that Hasan recently released to The New York Times. “He stated, ‘I don’t think what I did was wrong because it was for the greater cause of helping my Muslim brothers…I regret being paralyzed,’” according to the sanity board report, which can be read online. “…however if I died by lethal injection I would still be a martyr,” he said. “He denied having remorse for his actions.”
The judge has precluded the prosecution from using or reading the sanity board report. “You will not access, read or in any way review the full sanity report,” said the judge, according to the Houston Chronicle. “That goes for all members of the trial team.”
Now we learn this week that emails between Hasan and Anwar al-Awlaki aren’t to be included either. Some might doubt the judge’s sanity, not Hasan’s. But, as CNN reports, “A military judge on Monday excluded e-mails between an Army psychiatrist and a key member of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula from being used in the psychiatrist’s death penalty case, evidence the prosecution contends goes to the heart of the motive of the shooting rampage at Fort Hood that left 13 people dead.”
“Investigations after the shooting rampage found Hasan had been communicating via e-mail with [the now-deceased] Anwar al-Awlaki, the U.S. born cleric who officials say became a key member of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula,” reported CNN. “Osborn ruled that the e-mails would have to be ‘redacted to prevent undue prejudice by association’ and would diminish its use as evidence.”
Ed Morrissey of Hot Air makes the point that these rulings by the judge “won’t hamper prosecutors at all, since Hasan admitted to the murders in his opening statement. The charges do not include terrorism, thanks to its lack of inclusion in the UCMJ, but the murder charges carry the death penalty anyway.”
Morrissey argues that “The real damage in this ruling is to the survivors and the families of the deceased. They want to pursue civil litigation against Hasan, and against the Obama administration’s designation of the attack as ‘workplace violence.’ Lawsuits will force the Department of Defense to answer for that decision, which keeps the dead and wounded from being recognized as victims of a terrorist attack. An attorney representing the families expressed his outrage yesterday, saying that the evidence of Hasan’s motives should have been allowed as they would in any first-degree murder trial.”
In reality, the cover-up has been going on since the day of this horrific attack. One person who testified to the carnage he saw during Hasan’s murderous attack was former private Lance Aviles. But back in 2010 Aviles was in the news for his testimony in an Article 32 hearing for Hasan where he was told to delete the video he took of the attack at Fort Hood on the very day of the shooting. He said he was ordered to do so by a non-commissioned officer on behalf of an officer.
In the real world, the Trayvon Martin case should have been a local crime story. A young Hispanic man unfortunately killed a young black man in self defense, as the police who investigated it determined. But after MSNBC and NBC got ahold of it and deliberately distorted it, they pretended this was the great civil rights story of our time, when it was no such thing. The rest of the media went along for the ride. Now, during a trial where the poisonous ideology of radical Islam is being exposed as not only waging war against the U.S., but throughout the world—against Christians, Jews and Muslims—the media have gone silent. They don’t want to be called Islamophobic, and they don’t want to make the non-jihadi adherents of Islam uncomfortable because of those who are killing in their name. The facts of this case demonstrate our unwillingness to acknowledge and confront this enemy of civilization. We wouldn’t do it when red flags were raised about Dr. Nidal Hasan, the military psychiatrist. And we won’t allow or acknowledge the overwhelming, self-described evidence put out there by Hasan himself, who wants to rub it in our faces.
Some might have thought that Hasan representing himself would make a mockery of the trial. The judge and the media are accomplishing this all on their own.
Roger Aronoff is the Editor of Accuracy in Media, and can be contacted at [email protected].