Invasion U.S.A. — Enemies From Within, Enemies From Afar…

By: Gerald Loeffers

First off, I want to thank the following people for showing up and getting Obama’s attention: Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and the Tea Party Express for the “CLEAN UP D.C.” rally mixed with great speakers and trash bags. Next, the truck drivers for the Constitution rally — a great way to choke up D.C. and show you’re not sheeple. Last but not least, the One Million Veterans March on Washington… what a great way to storm the barrycades and to make a special delivery to the White House. Oh, I forgot to thank the national park rangers for doing nothing and the D.C. SNIPERS and the D.C. SOUTH BEACH RIOT police for taking a stand on “ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS.” Great job guys!

This day got me thinking about how we got to this point in modern American history. Make no mistake… today was a tipping point. This was a major point in history when a president got hit with not one, not two, but three large protests in a single weekend. I bet if someone did research, you might find Obama has been protested more than either Bush or Reagan. Of course, most of those protests weren’t grassroots anyway. But I was wondering… where did America’s enemies come from? What’s their history and philosophy? Where did they get their start? Well, let’s look at that. We will start with the 1890s and go from there.


Yes, the Founders were worried about America and what would happen to the government they helped create, long after their deaths and they also warned of this. Among many of their other warnings was that man’s nature to seize more power and control would riddle the Republic for years to come; long after they faded from memory. So, during the latter part of the nineteenth century, a group of politicians, professors, futurists and other intellectuals decided to concede that the Constitution is outdated and old and didn’t reflect the rising modern times. That the average person was too stupid to live on his own without this group’s oversight. They would navigate us to a better place — a utopia of peace and well being, far from the troubles of individual liberty and responsibility. Under their care, we would progress beyond the need for that silly dusty four-page document. Thus, in 1890, THE PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT was born and it had many famous members: WOODROW WILSON, THE ROOSEVELTS, THE BUSHES, H.G. WELLS, GEORGE BERNARD SHAW, HILLARY CLINTON (who in 2008 on CNN admitted to it) and this enemy from within America has gotten its hand on both the Democrats and Republicans. Both parties are just playing games and getting us closer to a socialist state at different speeds. I say that it’s more then a game, it’s a fight to see who gets control of America and who keeps that power the longest. Who can blame the parties? So, you change your mind and vote for the other Progressive instead. Get out of that game and defund both parties! Recall all the rats!


Now, believe it or not, 200 years before that German pinhead wrote The Communist Manifesto, the early Jamestown settlers were the first to practice communism before it was named that. In fact, it was called ‘COMMUNAL LIVING.’ These early adventurers needed money to pay for the journey to the new world, so they got the loan they needed, BUT there was a string attached. They must do this “COMMUNAL LIVING” experiment in order to get the loan. So, they agreed to it with deadly results. Then move ahead to the 1940s, with both FDR and STALIN in office. There was already a Communist party U.S.A. some years before that… but no one paid it any mind (big mistake). During this time, Russia was hurting something awful and wanted money, food and equipment. At that time we weren’t at war and Stalin had just come off killing over 40 million of his own people. Now FDR was enamored with Stalin. Get this… he truly believed that Uncle Joe was doing God’s work through communism and so with with the stroke of a pen, he gave Stalin everything he wanted; no questions asked. At the same time, old Uncle Joe already had his spy network in place at the White House and was close to FDR himself. He also had plans to inject the labor unions with communists and corrupt them as well (done successfully). Stalin’s own operatives where literally flying reams and reams of top secret documents out of Montana of all places. And during this same period, FDR had tried to produce a secret treaty with Hitler, but it wasn’t to be because Hitler already had a Nazi spy in Washington and he had also found value in a profile of FDR which he used to his advantage. Let’s be honest. FDR was Obama before Obama was cool, lol. As far as I know, back in the early teens there was an American Socialist Party with most of the same goals as the Nazis and the Progressives. Do you know what they both have in common? Ding, ding! That’s right… EUGENICS! Selective or de-selective breeding (abortion) of a master race with none of those annoying minorities that make this country great. And what was Uncle Joe’s final gift to the world and to America? THE UNITED NATIONS, which is just chalk full of dictators, as well as communist and socialist countries that want us dead or converted and this was accomplished by FDR, with his over trust of Stalin. Churchill, in a letter to FDR, warned him not to do this, but what did FDR do? That’s right… he threw Churchill under the bus. Joe agreed to the formation of the UN as long as Russia had veto power on the Security Council and in doing so, they gave FDR nothing in return. FDR tried many unconstitutional fixes that didn’t pass muster because the courts and the people saw them for what they were… a slip towards socialism. FDR even tried to rewrite our rights in a disaster called The Second Bill of Rights, which not to anyone’s surprise was fashioned after the Soviet Union’s constitution. Yeah, I don’t think so, Frank baby. Don’t get me started on The New Deal — that was just old socialism at work or lack thereof.


During the 1980s, Reagan was a really nice guy to a fault on certain issues; one of them being Mexican immigration. He had a temporary work visa program in place which did work to a point, but as with all temporary government programs, it became rife with corruption. Also during this time, Reagan engaged America in the war on drugs, targeting South America mostly. I don’t promote drugs and I am not in favor of legalizing any recreational drugs of any kind, but the Reagan drug wars were a failure, just saying. Later on, the South American cartels moved into Mexico and turned this once lovely and favorite vacation spot of John Wayne’s, into a living hell for us and the Mexican people. It never did help that Mexico went through a communist revolution itself in the 1970s. The corrupt government in Mexico isn’t any help either with its own people. The police and military are corrupt as well, with many going AWOL to work for the cartels for better money. Years later, we have open boarders, boarder town wars, mass rapes and kidnapping far into Texas and Arizona. We have small town police being beheaded and car bombings. So, with the cartel and now terrorists paying some of these poor people to smuggle them or drugs across the boarder, it’s no wonder we have cattle ranchers doing guard duty on their own land, but then getting sued for doing it. In the past, many of the illegals were honest, very hard working people. I used to know a few. They would not stand for welfare laziness or crime within their own ranks, but that is all in the past. These days they have their own mafia and an extremist and violent South American gang called MS-13, which we keep deporting, but they keep coming back. We also have a faction of these illegals that seem to think we owe them something and that we stole California from them. They have formed radical communist groups like The United Farm Workers Union and a much more spiteful group, LA RAZA, who demand free everything. They seem to think it is their right and not a crime. We have heard over and over from politicians about how they are going to fix the boarder problem, but more and more boarder patrols get killed or put in prison for doing their jobs. Whole boarder towns are at Defcon 3 and children as far as Texas are being recruited by the cartels as drug mules. Why is our government not doing anything? One answer — VOTING BLOCK and guess what? Both parties are guilty of it period.


Let’s go way back to 1939 when Hitler and The Muslim Brotherhood were working side by side and hand in hand. Ah, the good old romantic days of Persia before it was changed to IRAN, which in Arabic means ARYAN. A loving tribute to Hitler and the widespread and unchecked growth of Islamic SS units and Middle Eastern branches of the Nazi Party in Africa, Eastern Europe and of course, EGYPT. Which has a modern version of the Nazi Party just 2 years old. Isn’t that special? Now, it’s 1990 and Bill Clinton is in office. He was told where he could take bin Laden out, but turned it down more than once. Our State Dept. was turning out both education and work visas to all kinds of nice people from many Islamic countries that hated our guts. But, money and access to our education system was just a small part of this. These visas were given to members of the Brotherhood and Hezbollah, who in turn became the sleeper cells that built a larger network of support and recruitment in America. Did you know that the Brotherhood has had a long term, slow, step by step plan for America for a very long time? It’s called THE PROJECT. Look it up at THE BLAZE network… they have a great documentary on it.

Then, in 1998, it happened… the first Twin Tower bombing and the USS COLE attack. If the guards had had their M-14 rifles loaded, things would have been different. But Clinton’s weakness as a dumbass and as a worthless numb nuts shone through; he brushed it off. We also now know as well that there was an effort to give these sleeper cells a pamphlet on how to be an American. I have a copy of it and it was printed in 1990! Then we got hit in 2001 by a small group of sleeper cell operators from Syria, Iran and other Islamic countries. Sorry to tell you truthers and conspiracy nut jobs out there, but Bush didn’t do it. So, don’t start with me. You will lose like you always do. Go back to your video games and put some pants on for crying out loud! Now, we’re in a sand box mess with a demoralized military and a shutdown of our war monuments. We have a socialist president who has the same love of Islamic radicals as did Hitler, only this time, he arms them up and gives them government jobs in DHS and other high ranking White House jobs. Then there is the recruiting arm of the Brotherhood in America, which is rampant through the colleges and the prison systems. There is also CAIR and the Holy Land Foundation that has nothing to do with charity or helping people out, but has been proven to be a fund raising scam for the Brotherhood and their counterparts. If you call these groups out for any reason, you are called a racist or worse, just to shut you up and make you sit down. Well, I for one will do nether. We need to keep calling evil by its name and know our enemies, for they are many.


Editorial: The Teamster and the Trucker

By: Dick Manasseri

On being tied to a union vs championing liberty

The Teamster sits at home, Sunday morning, getting ready for the NFL schedule to unfold.

The independent trucker drives his rig into D.C. to shut it down, to support the veterans who open up their own memorials, yesterday morning, with the help of Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and Sarah Palin.

The Teamster smiles knowing that his healthcare policy is protected due to special status given to Jimmy Hoffa (pictured, above) and the Teamsters Union, in payback for the election dollars that flood the coffers of the Democratic Party.

The trucker grits his teeth knowing his freedoms are being eroded. His family falls under the individual mandate of Obamacare; against his will, he must either pay higher premiums or a tax to the IRS.

The teamster doesn’t question why his union leadership supports amnesty for illegal immigrants despite its negative impact on American jobs. Somehow, it’s okay for the Teamsters and other unions, like the SEIU, to support the amnesty agenda. After all, amnesty means there will be more votes for the Democratic Party and forced unionization will continue.

The trucker knows the truth about the Communist agenda that dictates policies like amnesty and Obamacare to Big Labor which in turn dictates that these become the policies of the Democratic Party.

The teamster believes that he can depend on the union and the government it pays for. He pays his union dues and cashes his paycheck.

The trucker knows that he needs to take a stand, now, before the dictates of those who would end America become reality with no recourse for his grandchildren. He reaches out to find a new coalition that he can trust to lead the convoy that will not be stopped.

Top photo: Trucker Mark Lyons, an owner operator, with his big rig, El Don.


New York City’s Marxist Power Couple

By: Cliff Kincaid
Accuracy in Media

De Blasio opens up to Baldwin” is how MSNBC described Alec Baldwin’s show with New York City’s Obama-backed Democratic “progressive” mayoral candidate, Bill De Blasio. “I was an early supporter of de Blasio’s,” Baldwin acknowledged.

Having been a virtual arm of the Obama White House for years, MSNBC is now turning into an arm of the de Blasio campaign. De Blasio, a former aide to socialist New York City Mayor David Dinkins, faces law-and-order Republican candidate Joe Lhota on November 5.

De Blasio’s support for communist regimes in Cuba and Nicaragua, and his embrace of Islam as an emerging political force, were highlighted in a recent New York Times article. The paper also noted his illegal “honeymoon” to Communist Cuba. However, the mysterious trip occurred in either 1991or 1994, depending on which paper you read, and much about the nature of the travel remains unknown.

Our review of documents concerning de Blasio’s involvement in the communist-front Nicaragua Solidarity Network confirms that notes of one meeting in 1991 say that he stated that Islam was an emerging “power,” and wondered if there were “progressive elements” in Islam “we can work with.”

Marxists like de Blasio who were sympathetic to the Sandinista “liberation” struggle in Nicaragua were typically active in support of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), a Soviet/Cuban-backed terrorist group. Indeed, anti-Israel and pro-PLO material was found in the archives of the Nicaragua Solidarity Network.

Another document regarding the “vision” of the group says, “End world capitalism and replace it,” and next to de Blasio’s initials are the words “democratic socialism.”

Baldwin’s comments during his MSNBC de Blasio interview included such observations as, “You seem to have a very warm positive healthy home life.” De Blasio, who is white, married a black woman and former lesbian, Chirlane McCray, and they have had two children together.

Modern-day progressives usually consider it wrong to even discuss the option of voluntarily leaving the homosexual lifestyle, but they have let the matter of McCray’s rejection of lesbianism pass without critical comment.

De Blasio says one of his wife’s poems about “growing up as a young African-American girl in a racist society” helped him to fall in love with her.

There is no indication that McCray abandoned Marxism after living in an enclave known as the Combahee River Collective.

The Combahee River Collective had issued a “revolutionary” 1977 statement saying, “We realize that the liberation of all oppressed peoples necessitates the destruction of the political-economic systems of capitalism and imperialism as well as patriarchy. We are socialists because we believe that work must be organized for the collective benefit of those who do the work and create the products, and not for the profit of the bosses. Material resources must be equally distributed among those who create these resources. We are not convinced, however, that a socialist revolution that is not also a feminist and anti-racist revolution will guarantee our liberation.”

The “collective” has been depicted by the media as a respectable group of feminist intellectuals, who were merely “radical” in some of their thinking.

The Combahee River Collective “statement” was favorably cited by Harvard Professor Richard Levins in a Monthly Review article called, “Continuing Sources of Marxism: Looking for the Movement as a Whole.”

In discussing the emergence of the Combahee River Collective and other such groups, he wrote, “In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels state that what distinguishes communists from other socialists is internationalism and looking for the movement as a whole. ‘Looking for the movement as a whole’ is a fluid concept that expands to embrace ever more inclusive struggles against capitalism and for a just and sustainable world. Increasingly, a movement centered on the working class has to champion the entire cause of the species.”

He mentions the Combahee River Collective after noting that a “core of strong proto-feminist women [had] emerged in the Communist Party USA just at the time when McCarthyism was making all red organizing difficult.”

He went on, “Groups such as Redstockings, the Chicago Women’s Liberation Union, and the Combahee River Collective and publications such as Sojourner developed a stance against the whole system of oppression. Within feminism, Marxists have played a leading role in insisting on a class analysis that showed that ‘women’ cannot be treated as a homogeneous mass with common interests, and also struggled against racism within the feminist movement.”

Bringing the situation up to date, New York magazine ran a story declaring that Chirlane McCray “would be a First Lady in the mold” of Hillary Clinton.

On a Spanish language New York radio station, WADO 1280 AM, de Blasio was asked about his Cuba trip and he proved evasive: “What did you see in Cuba, what is your impression going on your honeymoon in a country that hasn’t had free elections in the last 50 years. What did you get from the trip?” The radio host went on, “If I can ask you one thing you came back from Cuba with, what was that thing?”

As noted by the New York Daily News, de Blasio dodged the questions and replied, “I didn’t go on a trip to fully study the country, I don’t pretend to have full perspective on the country. I have a huge critique of the current government there because it’s undemocratic.”

But it was just as undemocratic then as it is now. So why did he visit the communist-controlled island, and what did he see and do there?

De Blasio’s opponent, Joe Lhota, has said that de Blasio “needs to explain himself—and explain himself now—to the hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers who escaped Marxist tyranny in Asia, Central America, and from behind the Iron Curtain in Eastern Europe.”

Lhota noted that de Blasio’s involvement with the communist Sandinistas “didn’t happen in 1917; it happened 70 years later when the cruelty and intrinsic failure of communism had become crystal clear to anyone with a modicum of reason.”

He added that de Blasio, who promises to tax the rich and spend more public money, is pursuing a “class warfare strategy” that is “directly out of the Marxist playbook.”

The new MSNBC show, “Up Late with Alec Baldwin,” did include some legitimate news reaffirming de Blasio’s controversial announced intention to crack down on police surveillance of terrorists and criminals. De Blasio opposes the stop-and-frisk practices of the New York Police Department (NYPD) and wants to replace Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, who has authorized surveillance of radical Muslims in order to thwart terrorist attacks.

“There have been 16 known terrorist plots against New York City since September 11, 2001,” the NYPD says.

The current mayor is Michael Bloomberg, a liberal who has nevertheless been a strong supporter of aggressive police tactics against potential criminals and terrorists. Bloomberg says, for example, that overturning stop-and-frisk would turn “over the streets to the criminals.”

Mike Long, the chairman of the Conservative Party of New York, told Emily Miller of The Washington Times, “I don’t often agree with Mike Bloomberg, but stop and frisk has made New York City that much safer. It has clearly saved the lives of people of color and is absolutely an important tool for making New York City one of the safest cities in the country.” Long said that without this enforcement mechanism, “we will be like Chicago in very short order.”

But the liberal media are betting that Lhota’s “Republican” label will be more objectionable than the communist sympathies of de Blasio and his wife, sympathies that are being played down by most reporters.

Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at [email protected]. View the complete archives from Cliff Kincaid.


Home Stretch: Lot Happenin’ For Lonegan

By: Lloyd Marcus

Thanks folks, you have been awesome. In these last few days before the Wednesday, October 16th special election for the New Jersey U.S. Senate seat, the Lonegan campaign has skyrocketed with national attention and activity. Rush Limbaugh said Lonegan will win. http://bit.ly/1cd5j4I

Sarah Palin is campaigning for Lonegan. Tea Party Express hosted a rally for Lonegan; keynotes were Sarah Palin and Mark Levin. http://bit.ly/GUNQ6u

Suddenly, Lonegan t-shirts are hot, figuratively worn by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and supporters across America.

My Conservative Campaign Committee has been pounding the drum for several months for Lonegan. We are running Lonegan radio and TV ads. We are most excited about our Lonegan ads running during Sunday Night Football and the pre-game show.

Our staff is organizing volunteers to phone-from-home for Lonegan, as voter turn out is hugely important. To participate please email: [email protected]

But folks, I just want to take a moment to express my deepest thanks and appreciation of you. Your support and contributions have made Lonegan surge from 30 points down to single digits. Remarkable!

Billionaire Mayor Bloomberg threw $1 million to Lonegan’s opponent’s campaign. http://bit.ly/1afuykF

Grassroots efforts for Lonegan simply do not have that kind of money to throw around.

You know me by now folks, I always look for the blessing.

Ours is a We The People movement, working together, united. As grassroots patriots, we make the best with what we have, using our creativity, skills and talents. We spend wisely. We are united in our common goal to restore America.

I spoke on the phone with a Lonegan supporter yesterday who said, “I’m 67. I miss my constitutional America.”

Sending rock-solid constitutional conservatives such as Lonegan to DC is step one.

Also folks, there is a stirring in the air, a new rebellion brewing against overreaching regulations, government purposely making the shutdown as painful as possible and the overall dysfunction of DC. Truckers organized a protest. Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz led the charge as veterans rallied in DC. http://bit.ly/1aBPwKL Yes, something is happening.

More than ever, we need politicians on our side who will not blink; refusing to back down simply because Democrats and liberal media call them bad names.

Conservative Republican Steve Lonegan running for U.S. Senate New Jersey is one such politician. We are in the home stretch with only a few days left, folks. Let’s get this “good guy” elected. http://bit.ly/1cd5j4I

Thanks again and God Bless.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman: http://www.conservativecampaign.org/


Lagarde Beckons the US to Commit Economic Suicide and Save Europe from Themselves

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton
Cross-Posted at Right Wing News

Photo by: Alex Brandon

So, Lagarde knows that ‘entitlements’ are a problem for the US down the road, but wants us to incur more debt right now to keep Europe from sliding into another recession. Where to start with this one.

First off, the US committing economic Seppuku will not save Europe economically. They are toast and they have done it to themselves just as we have.

Second, I fail to see how encouraging us to print ever more money to pay our debts does anything more than prolong the inevitable of having to face the fiscal reality that you can’t get your money for nothing and your stock ticks for free forever. It doesn’t work like that – sooner or later, you have to actually earn your income and pay your debts. I know, I know… this is foreign and unexplored territory for our politicians, but nevertheless, the piper must be paid and he’s pissed.

Third, Lagarde knows all of this is bullshit. Seriously. Globally, all of the Marxists want the US to collapse and this is just more of the same faster, faster, pussycat rhetoric. Claiming that Japan is suddenly just fine and the world is economically on the upswing is like swearing the check is in the mail while you are packing to flee town. Utter crap.

The Washington Times:

The chief of the International Monetary Fund says the U.S. government’s stalemate over spending and its debt limit is “very, very concerning” and could roll back economic progress around the world.


“And then they found out that the debt ceiling was the issue,” she said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “They found out that the government had shut down and that there was no remedy in sight. So it really completely transformed the meeting in the last few days.”

Ms. Lagarde, a lawyer from France, added a global perspective to the standoff that has roiled Washington for weeks and befuddled overseas investors who typically view the U.S. as a paragon of financial rectitude.

You bet she added a global perspective – a socialist/Marxist one. And, seriously? A paragon of financial rectitude? If overseas investors view the US as such a virtuous economic entity, they are delusional, on drugs, lying, blind, desperate or all of the above. Look… the Euro crooks have faith in the American crooks. We’re saved! Not.

The Queen of creative legal manipulation and accounting spoke thusly:

Ms. Lagarde, in her interview with NBC host David Gregory, agreed that entitlement spending will be a significant problem for the United States in the long run. But she threw cold water on claims that Thursday’s deadline to raise the debt limit is inconsequential.

“Creative accounting is not the solution,” she said, “and markets know that.

“If there is that degree of disruption, that lack of certainty, that lack of trust in the U.S. signature, it would mean massive disruption the world over, and we would be at risk of tipping yet again into a recession.”

The United States has to get serious about entitlement spending down the road, but slashing spending in the near-term could be counter productive, she said.

When it comes to the U.S. economy, she said, the IMF tends to say, “Hurry up, but slow down.”

“Hurry up because measures have to be taken now to deal with entitlements, as you suggested, because there is a level of entitlement coming up and big liabilities coming up as well in terms of interest payment,” she said. “But we say slow down because the point is not to contract the economy by slashing spending brutally now as recovery is picking up.”

Recession? I hate to break it to her hindends, but the world is in a global depression thanks to elitists such as herself who have deliberately plunged us into this hellhole. There is no recovery you minx, you. You just want us to ‘hurry up’ the final catastrophic collapse of the US economy, so you can get on with global reformation. As Lagarde beckons the US to commit economic suicide and save Europe from themselves, our leaders are right there with her pushing us off the cliff.