Obama’s Trojan Horses, Glenn Beck and Christian Love

By: Lloyd Marcus

Insidiously, Obama is using beautiful needy illegal alien kids as perfect Trojan Horses to continue his fundamental transformation of America for decades. A Hudson Institute study shows that illegals granted amnesty by Obama are far less inclined to assimilate; embrace English, the concept of American Exceptionalism and respect our Constitution. http://bit.ly/1qeJE4v

The study also shows that illegals granted a “get in America free” pass from Obama do not view America as being better than other countries. Thus, putting these future Democrat voters on the same page as Obama and the MSM.

Obama using kids as time-released sleeper cell Trojan Horses for his transformation of our country is brilliantly evil. His exploitation of these kids includes using them as human shields, providing cover for his hidden-in-plain-sight criminal illegal alien invasion of America. This arrogant evil man is skillfully exploiting the compassion, generosity and goodness of the American people.

Even the hearts of Glenn Beck and George Will have been touched and deceived by the faces and plight of the children invading our country daily. http://bit.ly/1rGK4Dt

Both Beck and Will have joined the chorus of those calling conservatives mean for not rolling out the red carpet to those invading our homeland. http://bit.ly/VWF27j Illegals disrespect our laws, contribute to the dismal state of our economy, exhaust our resources and wave their country’s flag while calling us insensitive when we celebrate or wear the stars and stripes – in our own country. Frankly, it is breathtakingly rude to come into our home and make demands.

Rewarding those invading our southern border is misguided compassion. It sends the world a message to come break our immigration laws and risk the extremely dangerous trek in which children are routinely abused, raped and murdered. The odds of rape are so high during the journey to America, Coyotes load up illegal alien girls with birth control. http://bit.ly/1sSh8Et Is it truly compassionate to encourage foreign parents to risk the lives of their children by illegally sending them to America?

I wish to address the manipulative flawed narrative that says true Christian love means never calling out evil doers or pushing back against those who aggressively impose their will on us. Does true Christianity require us to sheepishly allow the Left’s “anything goes” philosophy to overtake our land?

I asked the wisest man I know, my 86 year old dad who is still the pastor of four churches after 50 years in ministry. Dad chucked and said, “I let the Word of God do the work. When I say something is an abomination to God, it is not me offering my opinion. I am simply quoting the Word of God.”

While the Left is typically repulsed by Christianity and the Holy Bible, they love to throw scripture in our face when they think it serves their purpose.

For example: When arguing against the death penalty for murders, the Left is quick to talk about the biblical mandate to forgive. And yet, these same people are outraged when anyone attempts to talk a woman out of aborting her innocent unborn child.

Psalm 127:3 says: “Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.”

I have about had it with Christians scolding our side for being angry and aggressively pushing back against Obama’s unprecedented lawlessness, tyranny, and iron fist assaults on our freedom and liberty. Handled responsibly, some anger is justified and even righteous. God does want us to fight back!

Paraphrasing a Bible story, King David and his army returned home after a battle greeted by the smell of smoke. The camp had been invaded and burned, their women and children were kidnapped, their possessions were taken. David’s men were so heartbroken and angry that they threatened to kill him. David prayed to God for guidance. God instructed David and his men to go get their stuff. They attacked their enemy and recovered their families and possessions.

1 Samuel 30: 8 — “And David inquired at the Lord, saying, Shall I pursue after this troop? Shall I overtake them? And He answered him, Pursue: for thou shalt surely overtake them, and without fail recover all.”

It is not God’s Will for Christians to allow evil to go unchallenged.

The metro-sexual weak-kneed spineless passive Christianity encouraged by the Left is simply a tactic to nullify opposition to their super aggressive repeals of our freedoms as they implement their socialist/progressive agenda; Obama’s fundamental transformation of America.

Upon his arrival on the national scene, Obama was seen as a messiah in the eyes of many; an articulate orator able to control the sea levels and create world peace. The Bible speaks of such false prophets.

Romans 16:18 — “For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naïve people.”

2 Timothy 3:6-9 — “These are the kind of people who smooth-talk themselves into the home of unstable and needy women and take advantage of them; women who, depressed by their sinfulness, take up with every new religious fad that calls itself “truth”. They get exploited every time and never really learn. These men are like those old Egyptian frauds Jannes and Jambres, who challenged Moses. They were rejected from the faith, twisted in their thinking, defying truth itself. But nothing will come of these latest impostors. Everyone will see through them, just as people saw through that Egyptian hoax.”

Real Christian love is making responsible, wise and character-driven decisions with the best interest of others at heart; not embracing lawlessness or surrendering to evil.

It is God’s Will that we take back America. Like King David and his men, lets go get our stuff!

Lloyd Marcus, Unhyphenated American

Chairman, Conservative Campaign Committee


This Weeks’ Weasel Of The Week!!! – 09/04/14

The Watcher’s Council


It’s time to present this weeks’ statuette of shame, The Golden Weasel!!

Every Tuesday, the Council nominates some of the slimiest, most despicable characters in public life for some deed of evil, cowardice or corruption they’ve performed. Then we vote to single out one particular Weasel for special mention, to whom we award the statuette of shame… our special, 100% plastic Golden Weasel. This week’s nominees were all certainly deserving, but one stood out this week as the overwhelming winner…


The British Government, represented by The Rotherham City Council!

The Glittering Eye: These weasels preferred letting more than 1,000 children be sexually abused by “Asian men” to being thought of as racist.

The Colossus of Rhodey: I nominate the British Government for failing to respond to, and for establishing the politically correct culture which led to, the raping/sexual exploitation of FOURTEEN HUNDRED children by (mostly) Muslim men from Pakistan in the years 1997-2013.

Yes, the Rotherham Metropolitan City Council , whose motto is… well let’s see…


Yes, everyone… except if you’re a young, under age British girl being pimped out, raped, beaten and sexually abused by a gang of ‘Asians’, cute Brit speak for Pakistani Muslims. Then, your pain, shame and suffering don’t count at all next to the desires of the South Yorkshire police and the Rotherham Council, who wish  ‘not to appear racist’ by actually doing something about it.

The London Times actually cited a 2010 report that came to light during the investigation of this horror that was written by the South Yorkshire police intelligence bureau which discussed “a problem with networks of Asian offenders both locally and nationally” which was “particularly stressed in Sheffield and even more so in Rotherham, where there appears to be a significant problem with networks of Asian males exploiting young white females.” It also referred to a document from the Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board that stated that the “crimes had ‘cultural characteristics… which are locally sensitive in terms of diversity’.”

Ah, yes. Sensitive. Diversity.

Accepting the reward on behalf of the Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council and the British Government, whose pervasive policy of political correctness at all costs created the sort of attitude that turned a blind eye towards the brutalization of its children is:


The head of Rotherham council, Martin Kimber.


And South Yorkshire’s chief constable, David Compton.

Enjoy the statuette of shame, gentlemen and be sure to share it with the rest of the gang. You have truly earned it and everything that goes with it.

Make sure to tune in every Monday for the Watcher’s Forum and every Tuesday morning when we reveal the weeks’ nominees for Weasel of the Week!

And remember, every Wednesday, the Council has its weekly contest with the members nominating two posts each, one written by themselves and one written by someone from outside the group for consideration by the whole Council. The votes are cast by the Council and the results are posted on Friday morning.

It’s a weekly magazine of some of the best stuff written in the blogosphere and you won’t want to miss itor any of the other fantabulous Watcher’s Council content.

And don’t forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter… ’cause we’re cool like that, y’know?


Cold War History Recovered — M. Stanton Evans

By: Brent Parrish
The Right Planet

This is a great discussion with journalist and author M. Stanton Evans who wrote the book Blacklisted by History, which examines the history of the McCarthy hearings, and the infiltration of known communists into the highest levels of the U.S. government. I often plug the book because I have found it to be one of the most complete and thorough investigations into the whole McCarthy affair, and what came to be known as the “Red Scare.” Mr. Evans spent some 10 years pouring over thousands of pages of F.B.I. documents related to the McCarthy hearings—which, in my mind, exonerates Sen. Joseph McCarthy.

Bella Dodd—an ardent member of the Communist Party USA in the 1930′s and 1940′s, who later left the party and became a vocal anti-communist—once said she believed the attack on Sen. Joseph McCarthy was one of the “worst smear jobs in history.”

Evans also coauthored the book Stalin’s Secret Agents: The Subversion of Roosevelt’s Government with the late Herbert Romerstein, which uncovers some of the activities of known communist operatives within the U.S. government. Herbert Romerstein also wrote the book The Venona Secrets: Exposing Soviet Espionage and America’s Traitors, revealing how the Soviets operated their intelligence service against the United States.

Yet, to this day, the derogatory term “McCarthyism” is still often used to describe a person who ruthlessly and maliciously maligns and impugns innocent people. WikiPedia defines McCarthyism as “the practice of making accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence.”

In Ann Coulter’s book Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, she devoted a chapter to Sen. Joe McCarthy stating “McCarthy was right.” According to M. Stanton Evans, she consulted him on this part of her book. Evans warned her that she would be attacked for taking a pro-McCarthy stance. But Evans provided Coulter with some ammunition. Evans told Coulter (paraphrase), “If people claim that McCarthy harmed and smeared all these ‘innocent people,’ then have them name one.”

Ann Coulter did just that when she appeared on the Bill O’Reilly show. According to Evans, O’Reilly made the tiresome charge that McCarthy only hurt “innocent people.” Coulter then asked O’Reilly to name one. Bill was stumped, but he finally said, “Dalton Trumbo.”

Mr. Evans explains in the video above that Trumpo was a Hollywood screenwriter in the 1940′s who was a Soviet, Stalinist sympathizer—a hardcore communist—hardly an “innocent,” nor was he a McCarthy case. He was a House Committee on Un-American Activities’ case. McCarthy had nothing to do with him.



Obama Betrays Freedom Fighters in Ukraine

By: Cliff Kincaid
Accuracy in Media

Gordon Chang pointed out on CNN that President Obama’s statement in Estonia that there is no military solution in Ukraine means that Vladimir Putin has a green light to continue his aggression there. No “military solution,” from Obama’s point of view, means that the U.S. will not support the freedom fighters in Ukraine.

“The West has refused pleas from Kiev [Ukraine] for heavier weaponry to repel Russian armor,” The Wall Street Journal points out in its Wednesday edition.

In effect, Obama has turned his back on the millions of young men and women in Ukraine who dared to dream of freedom and independence for their country. Obama and his Western allies, including Angela Merkel of Germany, are letting Russia carry out a slaughter.

It is not on our TV screens, in the same way that the Islamic State is beheading Americans, but the lives being lost are just as real. However, the American people are being misled by Russian propaganda masquerading as “news” into thinking that there is some factual dispute over what is really happening there, and that Russia has a legitimate gripe. The impact of this campaign of disinformation and propaganda cannot be ignored.

We have pointed out repeatedly that the Western media play into Moscow’s hands by treating Putin’s lies as just another point of view. We see examples of this every day. A phony “balance” is achieved between what should be obvious—that Russia has invaded Ukraine—with obviously false denials. Consider a story in Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal.

Alan Cullison’s story, “Russian Ambush Spoils Soldier’s Fortune,” is full of important information about the brave struggle of the Ukrainian forces and how they have not received the support from the U.S. they deserve. Yet, we are also treated to outright lies from the Russians.

Cullison notes that Ukrainian soldier Artyom Kravchenko, the main subject of his piece, “and thousands like him who are long on enthusiasm and short on weapons are being quickly overrun by better-armed Russian troops and Russian-armed militias.” This statement demonstrates what everyone knows to be the case—that the Russians have invaded Ukraine. Indeed, Kravchenko was captured by Russians after being seriously wounded in an ambush. He was later released, eventually arriving in a hospital in Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, for treatment of his injuries.

The article notes, “Europe has responded with moral outrage and sanctions that have so far proved ineffective against Russia, which denies that it is funneling arms or troops across the border.” The Russian denial is apparently inserted for the sake of balance, although it is contradicted by all of the other facts in the story.

“In a war that has been fought mostly through long-distance artillery exchanges, the wounded arriving in Dnipropetrovsk are among the few Ukrainian soldiers who have seen Russian soldiers in Ukraine face-to-face,” Cullison notes.

Then he provides a window into the mentality of the Russian soldiers in Ukraine, who have been brainwashed by Putin’s media. “Russia’s state-controlled media has demonized the Ukrainian government as riddled with neo-Nazis,” Cullison reported. “Survivors of the ambush said the Russian soldiers were mainly paratroopers who were kind to prisoners, but believed reports on Russian television that Ukraine had set up concentration camps for ethnic Russians.”

Russia originally invaded Ukraine in February, taking Crimea, and now it is seizing Eastern Ukraine. Still, Obama has failed to support the brave people of Ukraine against Russia with the weapons they need for their own self-defense.

The truth is that Putin is winning, lives are being lost, and Obama is doing nothing of substance to stop the Russians. Putin is winning in part as a result of brainwashing not only his own people, but the West. The constant nonsense about Nazis in Ukraine is even having an impact here.

The Journal story about the Ukrainian soldier notes that his training consisted of calisthenics and one day of shooting a Kalashnikov. He then boarded a minivan that joined a column of at least 60 other Ukrainian vehicles. The story went on, “Ukraine’s poorly funded armed forces often rely on buses and minivans to ferry many of their troops. After the convoy had been on the road about an hour, Russians and Russia-backed militia opened fire on it, first with mortars, then with machine guns, he said.” Kravchenko managed to escape with a serious shoulder injury, but his fellow soldiers were killed.

The Journal notes that his unit, “funded by private donations, was no match for the artillery and tank fire of the Russian military.” Again, this is another confirmation of the Russian military invading Ukraine—as if we needed more proof. And yet the Russian denials keep getting reported as if they mean something.

The sad part of the story, from an American point of view, is that the Obama administration is sacrificing the lives of these soldiers when, with appropriate and necessary support, they could have a fighting chance of saving their country.

The failure to provide them with weapons of self-defense says far more than Obama’s words in Estonia about saving the West and the NATO alliance against Russia. Obama just can’t be believed.

Kravchenko told the Journal, “I was an idealist and I wanted to help. But I don’t think we can do anything now.” His enthusiasm has clearly left him.

And who can blame him? Obama, Merkel and the rest of these Western “leaders” have refused to support the Ukrainian struggle for independence from Moscow.

At the same time, Obama plays into Putin’s hands by refusing to even describe the invasion of Ukraine as an invasion. Our media go along with the facade, playing into Obama’s (and Putin’s) hands.

It’s almost as if Obama is a puppet of Putin.

It’s time for the media—in what we used to call the “free world”—to decide which side they’re on. Truth requires facing the facts about evil not only in the Middle East but inside the Kremlin.