The Oprah-rization of America

Sharing is caring!

By: Lloyd Marcus

Feelings, nothing more than feelings. Trying to forget my feelings of love…” Okay folks, I’ll stop singing.

Is it just me or have you noticed that feelings now trump common sense and rational reasoned thinking in America today? Feelings have become more important than national security, our economy, the lives of our troops and even public health when you observe the politically correct way our government is dealing with this Ebola thing. It is insane.

I am not blaming Oprah, but I saw this trend towards everything-being-about-feelings beginning decades ago when the Oprah Winfrey show became the hottest thing on national daytime TV. Has our culture become too feminized?

Before I continue, allow me to admit an embarrassing personal quirk. When I am passionately talking about an issue, I sometimes struggle to hold back tears. Encountering honorable things such as love, courage and goodness also tend to cause me to well up. Every time this happens during a radio or TV interview, I feel humiliated. I ask myself, “Lloyd Marcus what in the world is wrong with you?”

My mom was a very compassionate and emotional person. As her first born, I wonder if I inherited something from her. I rationalize my quirk with the knowledge that Jesus wept for his people. So, I am in good company.

Having said that, I am appalled by the emotion-driven touchy-feely brain-dead metro-sexual idiocy that is running the show in America today. Apparently, somehow I missed the national memo banning testosterone and common sense.

Dad taught my three younger brothers and me to take pride in being men; always try to do the right thing, stand up for what you believe, nobody owes you anything, protect and respect women. Dad instructed, “When you take a girl out on a date it is your responsibility to return her home safely.” That is being a real man.

In our new wimpy America, manhood is no loner celebrated. Respecting women now includes asking a girl’s permission before kissing her. Folks, biology dictates that most women like confidence in their men. Wimpy liberal dudes and hardcore radical feminists do not go nuts and misinterpret my point. I am NOT saying that women like overly aggressive jerks.

All I am saying is that I would not have witnessed the same swooning reaction from my mom to the movie scene in which Burt Lancaster kissed Deborah Kerr on the beach had Lancaster asked permission before kissing her. http://bit.ly/1rLpQFn

America’s obsession with taking a kinder, gentler, careful not to offend or hurt anyone’s feelings approach to everything is out of control.

A few examples…

Guilt feelings over America’s sin of slavery have lead author and Ebola expert David Quammen to suggest that we risk Ebola getting into our country rather than blocking flights from Liberia. So this fool cavalierly advocates putting millions of Americans at risk of contracting Ebola as payback for slavery. This is insanity, folks. http://bit.ly/1CKvUD5

As a child, I remember my grandmother was sent away (quarantined) for over a year because she had tuberculosis. Should my family have raised a stupid emotion driven stink saying there they go again, locking way (enslaving) a black woman? Quarantining my grandmother was the right thing to do; common sense.

Then, there is the disturbing way feelings has been allowed to reign supreme in Ferguson. Cops were instructed, do not come across too aggressive and let the angry looters wreak havoc freely for a night or two. Despite the police super sensitive nuanced response, Ferguson is still a war zone.

Allow me to propose a radical and controversial concept. How about the Ferguson police locking up everyone who breaks the law? I am concerned that feelings, rather than the facts, may factor in the fate of officer Wilson who shot Michael Brown.

A Democrat Missouri state senator said if officer Wilson is not indicted, then the current rioting “will seem like a picnic”. http://bit.ly/1vHoP32 Isn’t such a threat outrageously irresponsible and inflammatory coming from a public official? Oh I forgot, the senator is black and Democrat, so he gets a pass. Never-mind.

Generals are frustrated that we are fighting ISIS with one arm tied behind our back because our Commander-in-Chief feels it would be unfair and mean to unleash the full power of the U.S. Military in defeating our enemies. http://dailym.ai/1oIofg Such half measures ultimately lead to higher numbers of U.S. troops dying. Its all about feelings folks.

In keeping with the Obama administration’s pattern of using every governmental agency at its disposal to overrule the Constitution, punish its enemies and bully Americans, the FCC is considering a petition to ban the name “Redskins” from being used over the airwaves. Can you believe that folks? Remarkably, Democrats believe being sensitive to the feelings of those who are obsessed with political correctness is worthy of killing the First Amendment. http://bit.ly/1n4LJAM

Everywhere you turn, Constitutional rights, the law and freedom of speech are being overruled by a hypersensitivity to hurting someone’s feelings. Liberals tell us that public expressions of patriotism and wearing a t-shirt displaying an American flag to a California school on Cinco de Mayo is mean because it hurts the feelings of illegals. Don’t you just want to yell, “This is my country! Get over it!” http://bit.ly/1rVRWz7

I know what you are thinking. What about your feelings as a hardworking, law abiding, flag waving, tax paying, play by the rules U.S. citizen? As far as Obama, Hollywood, the MSM and assorted other liberals are concerned, your feelings do not count. Period.

Feelings, woo-o-o feelings…woo-o-o feelings, again in my arms.”

Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Chairman, Conservative Campaign Committee

2 thoughts on “The Oprah-rization of America

  1. The same in Australia. The over emphasis on feeling is part of the feminization of the West that is associated with leftists and specifically with the feminist movement. Some emphasis on feelings is not an entirely bad thing, feelings have a place in the world and a softer “more feminine” view of the world is indisputably valuable in some respects. As a matter of fact I suspect that the violent and disgusting culture of Islam stems from its subjugation of women and over emphasis on a medieval “manly” view of the world which emphasizes war, conquest, rape, pillage and other “wonderful” bounties sought after by Islam – irony alert.

    But it has gone far, far, far too far in the West. When government policy is formed not because of evidence and facts (or reality) but because of feelings – it has gone far too far. This is the situation we often have in my home country, Australia, especially when leftist governments are in power. A flood of illegal “boat people” start turning up on our border. Not a problem let them all in. It makes us feel good. We are helping them. It makes us feel compassionate. It makes us feel like good people. Not only that when they get here give them money to live from the public purse. And then let their families come too. Feels good! Well not to me it does not . It does not make me feel good – especially when every week that passes sends a message to yet more people that if they come we will let them in. It does not matter whether these people have skills we want or not, we let them in. It does not matter whether these people are terrorists or potential terrorists we let them in. And we ignore the effects on our society, our economy, our people and our future. And this is only one small example where feelings has invaded government decision making and is destroying our country. It is also destroying the West.

    Manhood is no longer respected. It is reviled. Manhood is regarded as a negative. It is hated and it is hateful in their eyes. Thank you very much leftists, feminists and those in public life who now happily go along with their destructive feelings based policies which are tearing our civilization down.

  2. I’m a woman, but even when my emotions show I, too, prefer to listen to thoughts rather than feelings. (“Type Talk” says that women aren’t really much more likely to test out as “feelers” rather than “thinkers,” but our culture judges female “thinkers” harshly. They’re right about that.)

    So, why discuss this as a boys-versus-girl playground quarrel? Can’t rationality be defended rationally?

Comments are closed.

Donate to
NoisyRoom.net

Support American Values...