Twitter’s Homofascist Crackdown and a Tale of Two Hashtags: #4Huston5 & #HustonWeHaveAProblem

By: Arlen Williams
Gulag Bound

“#4Huston5” is what some of us are using now in Twitter. “#HustonWeHaveAProblem” is what Twitter was blocking, something exposed in the following D.C. Caller article.

Follow-up toPastors Ordered to Submit Sermons to Government in Houston; Degeneracy Brings Authoritarianism

San Francisco’s own Twitter seems to be dressing up in the flamiers’ black leather (flamers’ as in the new media version of book burning, fascist style… no, not crematoriums, at least not at this point… maybe a bit of Molech worship’s “fire in the belly,” too; that’s related but different).

Twitter Blocks Campaign To Protect Pastors From Having To Hand Over Its Sermons and Emails To The Government

Why do you call it “homofascism,” Daddy?

Homosexuality and related gender confusions are naturally obvious disorientations of identification, belief, and practice. Clearly, American government does not exist to punish all deviant behavior, nor to come to everyone’s rescue in every way, however much trouble anyone may be in. Unfortunately for all of us, sexual deviance often brings with it two attitudes however, that are destructive to society: 1. obsession and, 2. the need to justify it. And destruction to society becomes encroachment upon our natural rights, the guardianship of which is American government’s essential task.


ADF is asking that patriots promulgate this graphic, use it as social media “avatars,” etc.

When the corrupted and strong motivations of sexual obsession and the need to justify oneself, even if at others’ expense, are mixed with the craving for power that is behind neo-Marxism, then making way for the homosexual movement becomes “sympathy for the devil” as the Rolling Stones sang. And in what this brings about, no one can ever “get no satisfaction.”

The “neo-Marxism” just mentioned is a less ham-fisted version of Communism, which itself is a refined version of the French Revolution’s Jacobinism. Its “neo” reflects a blending with fascism, stemming from a legion of post-enlightenment rationalizations of corrupt human vanity and the hunger for power by those who wish to transform human nature into something it is not, gaining personal power over others in the process of their ersatz solutions.

The homosexual movement is a seemingly altruistic ploy insinuated into American society. It has been a stiletto-sharp weapon in the hands of those who would inflict hard-core political perversity upon us.

Please forgive me for not citing the source for the following. Any colleagues are invited to apprise me. As I recall, not long ago a former KGB agent commented that one of their most pleasant surprises was that in America, the adoption of homosexuality as normative was becoming so very instrumental. It has been much more useful here lately, than for example, in Russia, in the 1910’s and 20’s.

This is a vanguard of a very real, very strategically effectuated war, on authentic America, upon us and upon the birthright of personal sovereignty based society for which we are accountable to each other and to God, Himself. Please know that, because we must engage the most effective measures in vanquishing this despotic enemy. That, as the Declaration of Independence so wisely charges, is our “duty.”

When the true, natural accountabilities of man are forsaken, he becomes controlled no longer by himself, but enslaved by others.

More follows, about the Houston 5 pastors and other tactically targeted attacks upon our First Amendment rights and overall liberties, in chosen places in America.

Is Houston’s homofascist mayor backing down after hearing truth from power? Well, maybe, kinda, sorta…

Pastors to Mayor: Don’t Mess with Texas Pulpits – Hands Off Our Sermons

And from the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) on Huston, and on Hannity last night:


Houston We Have A Problem…And A Constitution!

From CBN on a Christian baker in Colorado:


And the CBN article on the same:
Crumbling Freedom: Cake Artist Sent to ‘Reeducation’

In the ongoing lawfare, psyops, and overall warfare, and in addition to this intrepid (a fine fascist-fighting term, for any WWII espionage fans out there) site and the above, I suggest tracking these two venues. Peter LaBarbera whom I’ve met and consider a friend, and Tony Perkins who is also a dynamo, are first rate patriots.

Americans for Truth about Homosexuality

Americans for Truth

Family Research Council

FRC | Pro Marriage & Pro Life Organization in Washington DC

“Like a muddied spring or a polluted well are the righteous who give way to the wicked.”
— Proverbs 25:26.


Texas Pastor At Town Hall Meeting Before Arrest: ‘I Am Breaking No Laws’

Texas Pastor Arrested for Demanding to Be Heard at Town Hall Meeting: ‘I Am Breaking No Laws’

Houston’s Mayor Backtracks on Church Subpoenas, Tosses Her Own Lawyers Under the Bus (Updated)

Louie Gohmert:

“Apparently, the subpoena was not merely about sermons, but also about harassment for exercising 1st Amendment religious freedoms that are in conflict with totalitarian-loving, Judeo-Christian heritage hating city officials. It appears they saw how this administration has successfully used the courts and IRS to harass and eliminate political adversaries without any adverse consequences, and so they are giving their own abuses a try.”


Seeing Ebola Through Obama’s Eyes

By: Cliff Kincaid
Accuracy in Media

The nephew of the black African who brought Ebola to the United States doesn’t blame his uncle. He blames us. He writes in The Dallas Morning News that his uncle did everything right in Liberia, but still got Ebola, and wasn’t treated correctly in the U.S. The claim is that he had a right to be on U.S. soil and that it’s our fault he’s dead.

I suspect this is how President Barack Obama views Ebola. How else do you explain his opposition to a common-sense ban on travel to the U.S. by people from Ebola-infected countries? Tragically, Obama’s alternative is for the U.S. to become infected. Then, he must figure, there will be more pressure to find a “cure,” or at least a vaccine. But who knows how many will die in the process? It could be hundreds, or thousands, or more.

Ordinary Americans are scratching their heads, and some are getting angry, over the “flawed” approach to Ebola by the U.S. government. These people don’t understand that Obama views restrictions on African travel to the U.S. as racist. He won’t say this publicly, but as someone who has been documenting Obama’s Marxist background and approach to public policy for six years, there is no other logical explanation. He sees the people of much of the world, including Africa and the Middle East, as victims of American foreign policy. We are responsible for their problems.

Speaking for the Obama approach, black Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D-WI) says it is “reactionary” to propose a travel ban. It is “unreasonable and dangerous” to keep Africans out, she says.

Rush Limbaugh delivered a commentary that was posted on his website under the headline, “Liberals See Ebola Through Prism of Slavery.” He quoted a liberal guest on Anderson Cooper’s CNN show as saying, “…we in America, how dare we turn our backs on Liberia, given the fact that this is a country that was founded in the 1820s, 1830s because of American slavery. We have a responsibility to stay connected with them and help them see this through.”

Limbaugh commented, “It’s our fault, see. If it hadn’t been for us and our evil ways back at the country’s founding, why, there might not even be an Ebola wiping out people in Africa. So we have a responsibility, a shared responsibility.”

Dinesh D’Souza wrote a book, The Roots of Obama’s Rage, on Obama’s anti-colonialism. I argue that Marxism, rather than anti-colonialism, motivates Obama. Still, D’Souza’s point is a good one. For whatever reason, Obama hates the West and all that it stands for. Permitting Ebola to be imported into the U.S. is one way to make the U.S. pay for its sins.

Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center has written a series of questions that illustrate how the Obama administration has facilitated the spread of Ebola to the U.S. Her conclusion is that “some people in industry, government and the World Health Organization did not want the Ebola outbreak to be confined to several nations in Africa because that would fail to create a lucrative global market for mandated use of fast-tracked Ebola vaccines by every one of the seven billion human beings living on this planet.”

The flaw in this thinking is that Ebola could spread so fast that millions will die and economies will collapse (including our own) before a vaccine is developed.

One can argue there may have been a similar motivation behind the federal response to AIDS, and yet an AIDS vaccine has still not been developed. Billions of dollars have been spent on it, however, as 39 million have died of AIDS-related causes. AIDS has mostly been dealt with through other drugs and treatments. It’s not clear if an Ebola vaccine will be effective or if it can be ready in a short period of time. Fisher is correct, however, that a vaccine is on a fast track, and that a vaccine would affect millions of people who would never have come into contact with Ebola if it had not been for the Obama administration’s decision to let infected people in. Fisher’s group, the National Vaccine Information Center, warns of deadly side-effects from various vaccines.

Obama’s use of the race card in the case of Ebola will become overt if members of Congress persist in calling for a travel ban. However, Obama can argue that a travel ban would violate a U.N. resolution against the “isolation” of the Ebola-infected countries. That measure calls on U.N. member states “to lift general travel and border restrictions, imposed as a result of the Ebola outbreak, and that contribute to the further isolation of the affected countries and undermine their efforts to respond to the Ebola outbreak…” It also “calls on airlines and shipping companies to maintain trade and transport links with the affected countries and the wider region…” Obama’s administration voted for this U.N. resolution.

The first member of Congress to call for a travel ban wasn’t a “reactionary” right-winger. Rather, it was liberal Democrat Alan Grayson of Florida. He made this common-sense request to the administration in a July 29 letter. “I believe that you have the legal authority to implement” a travel ban, Grayson said in his letter to Secretary of State John Kerry and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson. But since the crisis has accelerated and his President has come under fire for the federal response, Grayson has gone mostly silent. He doesn’t want to hurt his party’s chances in the November elections by criticizing the Democratic President.

Isn’t it strange that a President who uses and abuses his executive authority to promote his own far-left agenda has failed to exercise his power to protect the American people from a deadly disease?

As Obama’s vote for the U.N. resolution that requires open borders and continued flights from West Africa shows, it seems as if the President of the United States wants to deliberately inflict pain and suffering (and death) on the American people. The U.N. approves of his actions, but the American people don’t. The Washington Post reports that a poll from The Washington Post and ABC News shows that 67 percent of people support a travel ban.

If Obama’s dereliction of duty in this life and death matter isn’t grounds for impeachment, what is?

In the House, where impeachment would have to originate, Republican Speaker John Boehner (OH) has just announced he believes that Obama should “consider” a travel ban. This is too little, too late to avoid the death and suffering which has already occurred. And he didn’t go far enough in his polite request.

Meanwhile, the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, chaired by Rep. Tim Murphy (R-PA), scheduled an oversight hearing on the Ebola outbreak for today (October 16th).

Full committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) says, “The Ebola outbreak is a global public health issue that demands an all-hands-on-deck response. We cannot afford to look back and say we could have done more.” Clearly, much more could have and should have been done, if only the Obama administration had acted on the need for a travel ban earlier.

Upton went on: “The United States has a first-class health care system and we will do everything necessary to treat the sick, contain the threat, and protect the public health.”

Again, that is clearly not the case. The American people are scared and will not tolerate this “don’t worry” rhetoric from Democrats or Republicans. They have seen for themselves how federal officials will lie to them.

Being the opposition political party, it is up to the Republicans to confront the criminally negligent and reckless approach to Ebola that threatens the lives of our families and loved ones. It is time for Congress to act against the President who has knowingly permitted this deadly disease to take root on American soil.


Kissinger’s Record of Failure and Betrayal

By: Cliff Kincaid
Accuracy in Media

Former Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger’s new book World Order is getting lots of favorable press and publicity. Our media treat him as something approaching royalty, with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria calling him “the elder statesman of American diplomacy.” He certainly has been around a long time. But has Kissinger been right or wrong about the major foreign policy issues of our time?

You may remember that Kissinger in 2009 insisted that President Obama could create a New World Order and that he had a good foreign policy team. He made these comments on CNBC during a “celebration” of 30 years of diplomatic relations between the U.S. and China.

Bill Gertz’s book, The China Threat, explained how Kissinger “played the key role” in the talks that led President Nixon in 1972 to establish informal ties with China, that ultimately led to formal diplomatic relations in 1979. Kissinger insisted that China had abandoned communism, and was no longer a threat.

The threat from China is growing daily. The new book, The Russia-China Axis: The New Cold War and America’s Crisis of Leadership, by Douglas E. Schoen and Melik Kaylan, examines some recent developments. As noted by analyst Toby Westerman, however, Russia and China actually declared their own version of a “New World Order” in 1997.

A recent article in the Bejing Review, “An Evolving Partnership,” goes back even further, noting that China and Russia signed a joint statement on “the foundation for bilateral ties” in 1992, and established a “partnership of strategic coordination” in 1996.

After that, the author notes:

  • In 2001, China and Russia signed the Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation.
  • In February 2013, China and Russia signed a joint statement to “deepen their comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination,” thereby “bringing bilateral relationship to an unprecedented level.”

Emphasizing that Russia and China currently enjoy a “very high level of relations characterized as [a] strategic partnership,” Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev says Russia and China are expected to sign more than 40 “very important bilateral documents” this week, on the occasion of the 19th regular meeting between Chinese and Russian prime ministers.

Today, Russia, China, Brazil, South Africa and India are members of the BRICS alliance of nations, which is designed to undermine U.S. economic, financial, and military dominance in the world.

A proposed Russia-South Africa nuclear deal has gotten the attention of South African Democracy Alliance leader Helen Zille, who says, “President [Jacob] Zuma has been to Russia on numerous occasions over the past 18 months. What were the details of these visits? Why were they so secretive? And why has Zuma clearly given preferential access to himself for the Russians, in the absence of witnesses or experts in nuclear energy? What are the incentives attached?”

Zuma, like his predecessors, was (or still is) a member of the South African Communist Party, brought to power through the African National Congress (ANC) with the support of the Soviet Union and Communist China.

Henry Kissinger’s speaking appearance on Wednesday at a meeting of the U.S.-Russia Business Council in New York City is more evidence of how “the elder statesman” has been wrong about key developments.

Zakaria’s CNN show has reported that Kissinger’s firm, Kissinger Associates, Inc., does business in Russia, while Bill Gertz has said that Kissinger used “his extensive access to Chinese leaders to help his consulting business flourish.”

The firm, however, has no website and its complete client list is secret. In 2002, as he was facing questions about potential conflicts of interest, Kissinger resigned as chairman of the September 11th commission. His personal website notes affiliations with think tanks and some companies.

He received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 for his work on the so-called Vietnam Peace Accords that ultimately resulted in a communist takeover of Vietnam and the genocide in neighboring Cambodia, after a liberal U.S. Congress voted to defund the anti-communist war effort. The communist North Vietnamese had been armed by China and the Soviet Union.

Kissinger wrote the foreword to the 2002 book, The New Russian Diplomacy, by Russian official Igor S. Ivanov, in which Kissinger discussed how Russia and the U.S. “have a rare opportunity to work together in building a new international system.”

During one of several meetings they have held together, Russian President Vladimir Putin said of Kissinger, “We have a very old, friendly relationship.” Kissinger and former Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov chaired a working group on U.S.-Russian relations in 2007. The following year, Russia invaded Georgia, a former Soviet republic.

Nevertheless, even after the invasion of Ukraine, Kissinger remains in Putin’s camp, telling Zakaria on CNN on September 14 that “one has to understand that for Russia, Ukraine can never be just another country. It is believed that Ukraine is an integral part of the Russian patrimony.” In other words, under Russia’s control.

There goes the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, guaranteed by Moscow in the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.

Kissinger told Zakaria that he proposes “some initiative from the White House for a quiet dialogue with Putin about where we are both trying to go…” The word “quiet” means keeping the details of the sell-out from the American people.

But much is being done out in the open. The corporate sponsors of the U.S.-Russia Business Council meeting are some of the biggest names, including ExxonMobil, Microsoft, PepsiCo, Ford, BP, Caterpillar, Chevron, Citi, Alcoa, Pfizer, Visa and Coca-Cola.

Kissinger has been consistently wrong about world events, and his mistakes have already cost the United States dearly. Our enemies and adversaries are on the march.

Yet, The New York Times notes that his new book contains “no direct criticism of the Obama administration…” Perhaps Kissinger is continuing to advise Obama’s former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The Washington Post asked Mrs. Clinton to review the book. She wrote, “Kissinger is a friend, and I relied on his counsel when I served as secretary of state. He checked in with me regularly, sharing astute observations about foreign leaders and sending me written reports on his travels.”

It’s no wonder we are losing.


‘Bush Lied, People Died’ (the Gulf War & cynical Democrat propaganda)

By: James Simpson
Gulag Bound

Misunderstanding of the Bush-Hussein (Saddam, not Barack) WMD issue is the direct result of the media’s pervasive, saturation psyops. It drowns out the truth to the point that even intelligent, well-read patriots buy into it. This is Jim Simpson’s follow-up to his new item, “Democrats Lied, People Died: Massive WMD Stockpiles Existed in Iraq. — AW


In 2005, I wrote an article by that title. It was meant sarcastically. It has always been the Left that drives Americans into dangerous, deadly situations. And this time was no different. Before the Iraq war, official Washington, that is the entrenched political Left, was beating the drum over Saddam’s WMD program. Virtually every single prominent Democrat, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and many others, described in apocalyptic terms the danger Saddam posed with his WMD program.

Nobody believed Saddam was telling the truth when he claimed he no longer had a WMD program. Everyone, even the UN, believe it or not, made statements to the effect that he needed to fess up or go. So it was infuriating to see the Democrats flip like a swtich the minute G.W. Bush decided to do something about it. Suddenly it was all Bush’s fault. George W. Bush, i.e. “Chimpy Bushitler” according to leftists, the knuckle-dragging moron, suddenly became the Machiavellian genius who tricked the credulous, innocent Democrats into a war for WMD that suddenly never existed! And Saddam’s connection to 9-11? Oh perish the thought, thou fools!

Only the Left, with its practiced media allies could pull off such a fraud. And only the Left would continue to pump that narrative. Leftists lie. It is pretty much all they do and one of the few things they are actually accomplished at. So I wrote the following article. It is long but read every word. More facts are cited in that article than any dozen from the New York Times or Washington Post. That is because it is based on facts, not an agenda, unlike the Post, Times and so many others whose facts must fit their agenda. I criticized Bush for many of the things he did. But he cannot be blamed for unilaterally suckering us into going to war. The Democrats share equal or more blame. And now, having utterly ruined our hard-won victories in Iraq, Obama can claim direct, personal and unitary responsibility for all those deaths and injuries being a horrific and pointless waste. Read on:

Bush Lied, People Died

That statement all by itself encapsulates the political Left’s modus operandi. It is at once deliberately provocative, crudely insulting and a calculated lie. Slogans like this are crafted for impact, not accuracy, and illustrate succinctly that the Left is…



Pastors Ordered to Submit Sermons to Government in Houston; Degeneracy Brings Authoritarianism

By: Arlen Williams
Gulag Bound

As America’s charter, our Declaration of Independence does declare, our nation is founded upon self-evident truth. That is a necessary condition for a people sovereign under God in their own nation.

Do we now think adopting the oxymoron of “same-sex marriage” is about our society maturing rather than embracing the dementia and depravity brought on by denying natural law’s natural reality? About love and acceptance?

If so, why are the tyrannical tactics of Fascists and Marxists (and old King George III) now being applied against our natural rights, especially against those who love all people enough to tell the truth?

SHOCK! Modern Day Inquisition as City of Houston Demands Pastors Turn Over Sermons

Excerpt from article in Breaking Christian News (before also linking to Charisma News):

(Houston, TX)—The city of Houston has issued subpoenas demanding a group of pastors turn over any sermons dealing with homosexuality, gender identity, or Annise Parker, Houston’s first openly lesbian mayor, says Fox News host Todd Starnes. (Photo via Wikipedia Commons)

“Those ministers who fail to comply,” he adds, “could be held in contempt of court.” Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) lawyers have since filed a motion to stop the subpoena. So what’s all the fuss about? As reported in Charisma News, Houston city officials are upset over a voter lawsuit filed after the City Council rejected valid petitions to repeal a law approved in June that allows members of the opposite sex into each other’s restrooms. The Houston Chronicle reported that opponents of the “bathroom bill” launched a petition drive that generated more than 50,000 signatures—more than the 17,269 needed to put a referendum on the ballot. The City Council threw out the petition in August citing “irregularities.”

Although Mayor Parker refused to speak with Todd Starnes, Stanley was quoted as telling the Fox News host that the mayor’s motives may be to publicly shame the ministers, possibly using their sermons to reveal them as “anti-gay bigots.” Said ADF Litigation Counsel Christiana Holcomb, “The city’s subpoena of sermons and other pastoral communications is both needless and unprecedented. The City Council and its attorneys are engaging in an inquisition designed to stifle any critique of its actions. Political and social commentary is not a crime; it is protected by the First Amendment.”

At Charisma News:

US City Subpoenas Pastors’ Sermons in Culture War Witch Hunt

At the site of the Family Research Council:

FRC Blog ” Snoops on the Stoops of the Church

At Alliance Defending Freedom:

Houston, we have a problem

Prior by Bub Unruh at WorldNetDaily:

Major U.S. city demands oversight of sermons


Weasel Of The Week!! 10/16/14

The Watcher’s Council

It’s time to present this week’s statuette of shame, The Golden Weasel!!

Every Tuesday, the Council nominates some of the slimiest, most despicable characters in public life for some deed of evil, cowardice or corruption they’ve performed. Then we vote to single out one particular Weasel for special mention, to whom we award the statuette of shame, our special, 100% plastic Golden Weasel.

This week’s nominees were all slime-worthy, but in the end the unanimous winner was…


Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control!!

The Glittering Eye: for saying this in an interview on Sunday about the nurse infected with Ebola in Dallas:

At some point, there was a breach in protocol, and that breach in protocol resulted in this infection, The (Ebola treatment) protocols work. … But we know that even a single lapse or breach can result in infection.

In other words he went out of his way to blame the patient, getting far out in front of what was actually known about the situation. He didn’t need to do that. He could’ve said something to the effect that they were very confident in their protocols and were exerting every effort to determine how this individual was infected and leave it at that. Now not only has he slammed the poor woman gratuitously, if it turns out that there’s a problem with the protocols he will have dealt a blow to the credibility of the CDC.

Arrogance and an uncaring attitude qualify him as a weasel.


Anyone who wonders where Dr. Frieden obtained this level of arrogance and clueless bureaucratic stupor needs only to look at his history.

His mindset was set in cement during his time at Oberlin College, generally conceded to be one of the more radical colleges in America. After graduating from Columbia Med School, and a stint at WHO, he enhanced his rep as a bureaucrat’s bureaucrat as Nanny Bloomberg’s very own chief health apparatchnik in New York City, responsible for implementing all of the onerous health regs, ‘sin’ taxes and similar liberty destroying programs.

Among other things, Dr. Frieden spent millions of NYC tax dollars on free condoms labeled with – wait for it – a map of the New York city subway system.

For someone who is referred to as an expert on communicable diseases, he continues to astound the world with some of his positions, such as his adamant opposition to a travel ban to the countries where Ebola is running rampant, and his silence on our open borders and some of the diseases illegal aliens have brought over the border with them. Nor did he protest back in 2010 when President Obama quietly abolished CDC quarantine regulations and programs designed to stop an Ebola outbreak here in America. In fact, it’s possible he may even have helped President Obama make that decision.

This is the same man who just today said during a telephone press briefing that you can’t get Ebola by sitting next to someone on a bus… but that infected or exposed persons should not ride public transportation because they could transmit the disease to someone else.


I’m certain Dr. Frieden isn’t making obviously ridiculous statements like that to misinform the public because he’s under strict orders from the Obama White House to downplay this Ebola stuff until after the midterms.

After all, even though it’s a lot better from the standpoint of politics über alles to blame a nurse for ‘not following protocol’ (even though she insists she did) than to admit this Ebola thing has been totally mishandled, I’m sure a dedicated health professional like Dr. Tom Frieden would never ever do anything like that.

Or… would he?

Step up and get your richly deserved Golden Weasel, Doctor Friedman! Here ya go. Oh, that saliva or whatever it is on the base? I’m so sorry! The delivery guy was telling me about that grungy character he had to sit next to on the subway coming here. Just wipe it off with your handkerchief, okay?

Well, there it is!

Check back next Tuesday to see who next week’s nominees for Weasel of the Week are!

Make sure to tune in every Monday for the Watcher’s Forum and remember, every Wednesday, the Council has its weekly contest with the members nominating two posts each, one written by themselves and one written by someone from outside the group for consideration by the whole Council. The votes are cast by the Council, and the results are posted on Friday morning.

It’s a weekly magazine of some of the best stuff written in the blogosphere and you won’t want to miss it… or any of the other fantabulous Watcher’s Council content.

And don’t forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter… ’cause we’re cool like that, y’know?