01/16/18

Out! Trump Tells CNN’s Acosta To Leave After Questions About ‘S***hole’ Comment

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

CNN’s Jim Acosta just doesn’t have any common sense whatsoever. In the Roosevelt Room, President Trump took questions from the media today and there was Acosta front and center asking Trump over and over and over again about the alleged sh*thole remark. At the end of a joint appearance with Kazakhstan President Nursultan Nazarbayev, Trump was asked by Acosta whether he said in a bipartisan meeting that he wants more immigrants from Norway. He kept asking about white people coming from Norway… he was clearly advancing questions that basically called the President a racist. Tacky. Why the hell don’t they pull his press credentials? I mean, you can’t really call what he’s doing reporting.

“I want them to come in from everywhere. … Thank you very much,” Trump said, as a White House aide urged the press to leave. Acosta then asked Trump whether he favors immigrants just from white or Caucasian countries. Of course, Acosta didn’t take the hint and finally President Trump looked right at him and said, “Out.” That was pretty darn clear and it looked like Acosta ran out of there with his tail between his legs. Which he did, because he then proceeded to whine on Twitter like a whipped cur.

Jim Acosta accused White House press aides on Tuesday of trying to “drown out” his questions for President Trump by shouting when he tried to ask them. Who could blame them? Acosta in a series of tweets claimed it was a deliberate attempt to stop him from asking the President questions. “As I attempted to ask questions in Roosevelt Room of Trump, WH press aides shouted in my face to drown out my questions,” Acosta tweeted. “I have never encountered that before.”

What a paranoid, fragile moron. They were getting all of the press out of there. But it was Acosta who was being obtrusive and rude, so he got special treatment just as he deserved. And from what I saw that is not what happened at all. He went on, “What occurred reminded me of something I would see in a different country. Certainly not at the WH. Certainly not in the U.S.” There he goes with communist dictator references. And yet, when there was an actual commie in the White House, Acosta groveled before him. More: “When I tried to follow up on this in the Oval Office, Trump told me to get “out.” We then went to the Roosevelt Room where WH aides obstructed us from asking questions.”

Despite what Acosta is claiming, the press was not manhandled by Trump’s aides. There was a certain period for questions and it was made clear that the sh*thole topic would not fly. But Acosta just had to play the victim and try to smear the President every bit he could. That’s what CNN pays him to do these days… not report. When Trump pointed his finger and said, “out” to Acosta, I think it was abundantly clear he’d had enough of the jerk. I don’t blame the President in the least for kicking the asshat out. Good. No pity here for the red snowflake. None at all. What a sniveling, partisan hack.

https://twitter.com/vlcallender/status/953375960757305344


01/16/18

51st State – New California Secession Possible

By: T.F. Stern | Self-Educated American

Folks who understand that self governance requires self discipline, those who’ve found themselves living on the ‘left coast’ while not being able to have a voice in that government have figured out a way to separate themselves from the fruits and nuts currently destroying the state of California. Secession; not from the United States, but the same way West Virginia distanced itself from Virginia, become a state unto itself.

(Image of proposed state boundaries courtesy of MSN’s linked article)

According to an article that showed up on msn.com, “The state of  New California  would incorporate most of the state’s rural counties, leaving the urban coastal counties to the current state of California.”

Interestingly, the folks who wish to secede and start out on their own have identified perhaps the single most important distinction that divides them from the progressives who currently are destroying that state.

“‘Yes. We have to demonstrate that we can govern ourselves before we are allowed to govern,” said founder Tom Reed.”

You see, progressives, socialists or communists; call them what you will, live on the premise that somebody else is always responsible to pay for the errors made while at the same time taking credit for any apparent advances created with other people’s money.

They refuse to consider that forcing others to go along with Social Justice schemes, redistribution of wealth or flat out corruption and tyranny have anything to do with the failures of the Utopian dream turned nightmare there in California.

I’m still waiting for Governor Brown to figure out a way to get the rest of the United States to bail California out of imminent bankruptcy.  It’s the rest of the country’s responsibility to make recompense for those who act irresponsibly; isn’t that how spoiled children view the world?

I read on one of the internet social forums where the United States might solve the on going craziness going on with the self proclaimed Sanctuary State that can’t pay for all the social programs intended to make everyone equally poor.  We could sell California to Mexico for a large sum of money, the figure was around twenty trillion dollars; but that number would be negotiable if the size of that sale were for a smaller piece of property.

Mother Nature might eventually have the deciding vote on any secession issue; but that wasn’t brought up in the discussions, at least not that anyone reported.  The San Andreas Fault runs pretty much along the lines drawn up and could deepen the divide, pun intended, between progressives and right wing conservatives struggling to achieve their goals.

The next highlighted article on the Explorer news page was about the tragic collapse of a bridge under construction down in Columbia that killed at least 10 workers.  Being a warped individual I put the two article together and considered how much easier it would be for a major earthquake to solve the problem, create a huge rift that clearly defined the borders of California and New California…it could happen.

01/16/18

It’s Simple Math: #DACA Would Create a Democratic ‘One Party State’ From 2020 Onward

By: Trevor Loudon | New Zeal

If President Trump compromises on DACA, you can kiss America goodbye.

It’s very simple math, people. We can safely assume that the vast majority of DACA beneficiaries will vote Democrat, if allowed to stay in the country. So will their families. That will be almost 5 million new Democrat voters, many of them concentrated in swing states, or potential swing states such as North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Florida.

The left understands that DACA is “a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success” – permanently.

Charles Benninghoff of Pray For US has done the math. It makes horrifying and sobering reading.

Background: President Trump won the 2016 election with 306 electoral votes – a margin of 36 electoral votes over the 270 needed to win. The secret to defeating him in 2020 is finding states with more than 36 electoral votes that he won in 2016 that can be denied him. DACA does that and more.*

We hope nobody reading this is naïve enough to believe that Democrats support DACA because it is the right, just and moral thing to do. There are over 800,000 illegal DACA immigrants in this country, which translates into an almost certain 800,000 extra Democrat votes. Additionally, because President Obama added parents and family members of DACA illegal immigrants to those “protected”, Princeton University researchers found that DACA recipients could bring in as many as four million relatives. Almost five million new Democrat voters could instantly be created by DACA.

The result of DACA will be adding nearly five million liberal Democrat votes every election day. If that happens President Trump and future Republican candidates are doomed. Numbers from the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service (USCIS) service show by state where the DACA illegals live, so we can predict where they and their family members will be voting.

Let’s do the math. President Trump was elected with a margin of 36 electoral votes. Florida alone has 29 electoral votes. President Trump carried the state by fewer than 113,000 votes. Using the Princeton University and USCIS numbers, DACA would add at least 250,000 Democrat votes to that total – more than twice Trump’s victory margin. Had President Trump lost Florida his electoral vote victory margin would have shrunk to just 7.

Arizona has 11 electoral votes. President Trump won those by a margin of 91,000. Again using the Princeton and USCI statistics, passing DACA would add at least 140,000 new Democrat votes. If Trump had lost Arizona, Hillary Clinton would be President.

The same math holds true for Georgia with 16 electoral votes and North Carolina with 15. DACA would add far more Democrat votes than the margin of Trump’s victory. There’s another 31 electoral votes gone from Trump and future Republicans. Taken all together, had DACA been in effect for the 2016 election, President Trump would have received 73 fewer electoral votes – only 233 instead of the 306 that made him President. There is absolutely no doubt that Hillary Clinton would be President today if DACA had been in effect in 2016.

That is why Democrats and illegal immigration activists demand DACA, and that is why President Trump and the Republicans must oppose it.

But don’t take our word for it – here’s what former Clinton staffer Jennifer Palmieri said in a recent memo to liberals; “The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success… If Democrats don’t try to do everything in their power to defend Dreamers that will jeopardize Democrats’ electoral chances in 2018 and beyond.”

The liberals know what DACA really means – possible defeat for President Trump in 2020 and creation of a permanent Democrat majority in the country. Five million new voters would instantly appear for the Democrats. Even if citizenship for DACA illegals and their families happens after President Trump is re-elected in 2020, new “dreamer” voters would have permanently created an unbeatable Democrat majority on election days far into the future. ..

If you’re still not convinced that we must stop any compromise on DACA, check out this clip from my documentary The Enemies Within. Using their own words, we compiled a montage of the most dedicated DACA activists such as Rep. Luis Gutiérrez and former Obama advisor Eliseo Medina.

Speaking of Latino voters, Medina said:

“…when they voted in November, they voted overwhelmingly for progressive candidates. Barack Obama got two out of every three voters that showed up

[…]

“We reform the immigration laws, it puts 12 million people on the path to citizenship and eventually voters”. Can you imagine if we have, even the same ratio, two out of three?

If we have eight million new voters who care about …… and will be voting. We will be creating a governing coalition for the long term, not just for an election cycle…

We need to send a very clear message to President Trump. His legacy and America’s very future depend on how tough he is willing to be on the DACA issue.

Let us not let the hope of the world be destroyed for the sake of compromise and emotional blackmail.

We must all stand strong on this issue for the sake of all who come after us.

READ MORE:

01/16/18

Weekly Featured Profile – Scott Poole

KeyWiki.org

Scott Poole

Scott Poole is a professor of history at the College of Charleston in South Carolina. He is the author of “Monsters in America: Our Historic Obsession with the Hideous and the Haunting,” as well as a number of other books dealing with popular culture and American history. He has been an advisor to College of Charleston Socialist Club and its chapter of United Students Against Sweatshops and is an active member of the Communist Party USA .

He also works closely with Democratic Socialists of America.

Scott Poole is also no fan of President Trump.

December 2016, more than 1,200 historians affiliated with hundreds of colleges and universities across the U.S. — including eight scholars at the College of Charleston, signed a public statement expressing “concern and alarm” over the First Amendment implications of the election of Donald Trump.

“On the eve of a new administration whose key players have traded in hateful rhetoric and emboldened the harassment of various targets, we urge Americans to be vigilant against a mass violation of civil rights and liberties that could result if such troubling developments continue unchecked,” the scholars wrote.

The “call to vigilance” was co-signed by College of Charleston professors George Hopkins, (a Democratic Socialists of America supporter) and Scott Poole.

On February 17, 2017 protesters gathered at the North Charleston Performing Arts Center Free Speech Zone 5 to protest President Trump who was in Charleston to, according to his Twitter account, “spend time with Boeing and talk jobs.”

Professor Scott Poole, took the mic, asking the audience “Are you angry? Are you full of hope? We need to be both. We need to be angry. Trump is coming here today. His buddies are here. His warehouse is here. He’s gonna high five Boeing execs. The art of the steal … crony capitalism. Let’s talk about his ally. Let’s talk about the war criminal and dictator Vladimir Putin. Google Aleppo. Find out what happened in Aleppo.”

Scott Poole traveled to Cuba in late 2017.

“I came to the Republic of Cuba wanting to look with a critical eye, despite my political affiliation as a member of the Communist Party USA. Trump’s renewed effort to cut Cuba off from the world, and the complete lack of logic behind such a move, has been much reported on. I hope to speak about this while also worrying the reader a bit with the dangers of romanticizing what is, arguably, the world’s most successful socialist experiment.”

The fact Cuba is allied to Vladimir Putin‘s Russia seems to have slipped Professor Poole’s memory.

(Scott Poole|more…)