Billionaire Bill Gates is pouring some of his wealth into development of an HIV/AIDS vaccine that will be mandatory for all young people, even children, in the U.S. Perhaps a scheduled “breakthrough” in this controversial effort and a plan for universal HIV vaccinations explains why major media organs and corporate and government officials are being used to demonize those concerned about the safety of vaccines. The U.N.’s World Health Organization (WHO) has gone so far as to issue a report ranking “vaccine hesitancy” as one of the top “Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019.”
With a mandatory HIV/AIDS
vaccine on the horizon, we should be hesitant. The AIDS
vaccine could be a major threat to global health. As a vaccine, it gives people
a form of the virus that causes AIDS on the assumption that we won’t develop
the entire deadly disease. If this assumption is faulty, it could cause
HIV/AIDS in millions of healthy people, many of them children and the elderly. There
was a swine flu vaccine scandal in the 1970s, when people got neurological
disorders from the vaccine before it was withdrawn.
Another Russian Plot?
Now that the Russian “collusion” story involving President Trump has run out
of steam, new villains have to be identified. Indeed, Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman
of the House Intelligence Committee who is still pursuing Russia-gate against President
Trump, has openly called for big companies such as Google, Amazon, and
Facebook to censor information casting doubt on the effectiveness of vaccines.
Although it has been open to different views in
the past, the “conservative” Fox News channel is now apparently backing
Facebook’s effort to “crack down on misinformation about vaccines.” Reporter Dan Springer’s story was headlined, “Study
links Russia to US misinformation campaign on vaccinations.” But his own
story quoted research saying the Russians were playing both sides
– running articles for and against vaccines.
Despite claims to the contrary from Big Government, Big Pharma, and Big Media, many people believe there is evidence linking the rise in autism among children to the MMR vaccine. Rather than have an open debate, the controversial film “Vaxxed,” which explores corruption in science regarding the MMR vaccine, was yanked from theaters and pulled from Robert De Niro’s Tribeca Film Festival. The producers of “Vaxxed” also report their film was removed from Amazon Video, including Prime and streaming, and Pinterest removed searches about safer vaccines and vaccine injury.
Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder of the
National Vaccine Information Center, is the parent of a vaccine injured child and
draws attention to children and young people now being subjected to 69 doses of
16 vaccines (starting on the day of birth) by the age of 18. She recently
recorded a video on “The New Internet
Police” that explains how a coordinated attack is already underway on those who
believe in personal freedom and informed consent in regard to these vaccines. Her
group is being actively censored and treated almost like a “hate group.” On January 19, she notes, the editorial board of the
liberal New York Timesdeclared that “anti-vaxxers” are “the enemy.”
Fox News should resist this kind of
censorship scheme. But its own host, Tucker Carlson, author
of Ship of Fools, made a fool of himself years
ago by spouting offensive nonsense on a shock jock show hosted by “Bubba the
Love Sponge.” Now, Carlson’s job is hanging in the balance, as he claims being
victimized by “the mob.” He has a national media platform that he can use to
defend himself, and Fox News is sticking by him (for the time being.) A media
personality who generates over $70,000 per speaking appearance, Carlson also has the Daily Caller News
Foundation, the non-profit arm of the Daily Caller, which he founded, doing articles on his behalf. It has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the
Koch Brothers and the Sarah Scaife Foundation.
But this face of modern conservatism is now looking like a major
embarrassment to the conservative movement. He’s not even that conservative; he
frequently brings on anti-American journalist and Edward Snowden collaborator Glenn
Greenwald as an authoritative source of information on Russia-gate, and allows
Fox contributor Tammy Bruce, a pro-abortion lesbian activist, to posture on his
show as a deep conservative thinker. It looks like Tucker has personal
knowledge of the “Ship of Fools” he writes about. He may be going
Who’s More Foolish?
What’s far more important than
the fate of a rich wise guy talk show host confused about conservatism is that
we have a national debate on Fox and other channels on such matters as the
well-established and verifiable fact that vaccines do cause injury and death,
and that an HIV/AIDS vaccine is being fast-tracked. Many people even today do
not realize that while vaccines work for a large majority of people, they can
also cause serious health problems, even death, for some. In recognition of
this fact, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. A National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to compensate
victims of vaccines has dispensed over $4 billion for vaccine injuries and deaths.
The common sense driving the parental concern crosses
ideological lines. In my case, one day after the birth of our third child,
hospital personnel tried to take him away for a hepatitis B vaccine shot. It’s
because of the work of Barbara Loe Fisher and the National Vaccine Information
Center that I was skeptical of some vaccines. My wife and I refused to have our
child injected with this controversial vaccine. Six months later, concerns were
raised about possible mercury exposure in children given hepatitis B vaccines
containing thimerosal, a preservative derived from mercury, a toxic metal that
can cause immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions.
Thimerosal is a preservative that was used as an additive in vaccines to prevent
bacterial and fungal contamination.
Hepatitis B mostly affects drug users, the sexually
promiscuous, blood transfusion recipients, and health care workers. So why are
innocent children who are not at risk being required to be vaccinated? It’s
because the government doesn’t want or can’t identify those who ARE at risk.
It’s easier to get the children, who are least likely to get the disease. The same is likely to be true for an HIV/AIDS vaccine.
Even assuming that such a vaccine could be developed, it will be easier for
national and global public health officials to target those for vaccination who
are at less risk of contracting the disease.
I interviewed Barbara Loe Fisher four years ago.
“There is a tightening of the noose around the people’s neck when it comes to
being able to make vaccine choices,” she said on America’s Survival TV. She
also discussed the prospect of a mandatory
AIDS vaccine. She is the co-author, DPT: A
Shot in the Dark (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1985), and
has served on several federal advisory panels and committees. But her
organization today is facing a massive censorship campaign because it stands in
the way of global and national efforts to inject populations with vaccines
containing controversial and sometimes deadly ingredients.
Years ago, I launched the Committee to Protect Medical Freedom, a project of America’s Survival, Inc. and held the first national conference opposing a mandatory HIV/AIDS vaccine. Barbara was a speaker. Jim Turner, a Washington, D.C. attorney and expert on the swine flu vaccine scandal of the 1970s, discussed how government vaccination programs can go horribly wrong. We examined how President Bill Clinton had declared AIDS a “national security threat,” created a Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS through an executive order, and that U.S. military personnel were being subjected to experimental vaccines. President Barack Obama issued his own follow-up executive order, “Implementing the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States for 2015-2020,” in 2015, and President Trump continued implementation of this strategy in 2017.
Such an “emergency” declaration
could also be used today on the civilian population.
The recent controversy
over vaccines suggests a governmental effort at the national and even global
levels to roll out a controversial new mandatory vaccine policy, possibly
involving an HIV/AIDS vaccine. Does President Trump understand what the
bureaucrats are doing?
Despite the censorship, a Coalition for Informed Consent
in vaccinations has been established. The NVIC is one of dozens of member
organizations around the country opposed to mandatory vaccination laws. Hundreds
of concerned citizens favoring freedom of choice in health care traveled to
Washington D.C. to have their voices heard at a stacked Senate
on March 5, 2019, regarding “Preventable Disease Outbreaks.” Parents concerned
or “hesitant” about vaccines were portrayed as the villains.
Rather than censor and
ostracize concerned parents, Congress should be scrutinizing where taxpayer and
U.N. dollars are going. Needed scrutiny should begin with the International
AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), an organization
backed by grants from the William H. Gates Foundation, the World
Bank, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Starr Foundation, the Alfred P. Sloan
Foundation, USAID, PEPFAR (the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief)
and UNAIDS. The president of IAVI
is the former chief public health and science officer with Merck Vaccines and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
World AIDS Vaccine Day is
observed annually on May 18. It marks the day Bill Clinton gave a speech
declaring, “Only a truly effective, preventive HIV vaccine can limit and
eventually eliminate the threat of AIDS.” The truth is that most people can avoid
HIV/AIDS if they just live a healthy and normal lifestyle. But we may not be
able to avoid the AIDS vaccine.
The lives of thousands of innocent Americans are far more important than the
careers of a few rich talk show hosts on Fox News. Let Tucker Carlson
and Sean Hannity give these Americans a voice. That would truly drive the
liberals and their own Fox News corporate bosses crazy. It would also reaffirm
the right of freedom of speech.
Democratic presidential primary front-runner Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) recently told reporters at a campaign stop in New Hampshire that she is “not a Democratic Socialist.”
The next question should have been obvious: “Well, then, what kind of socialist are you?”
Harris has been surrounded by socialists and communists her entire life—beginning with her staunchly Marxist father. Harris is the older child of two 1960’s Berkeley radicals: Shyamala Gopalan, a cancer researcher from the state of Tamil Nadu in southern India, and Donald J. Harris, an economist from Jamaica.
Gopalan and Donald Harris were very active during the civil rights and anti-Vietnam War protests of the era, often taking baby Kamala to protests in a stroller, according to a recent article in the San Jose daily newspaper The Mercury News on the Harris family.
The couple separated after Donald Harris took a professorship at the University of Madison–Wisconsin. Gopalan filed for divorce in 1971 and won custody of her two daughters in 1973.
Kamala and her younger sister, Maya—now her presidential campaign chair—regularly visited their father during school holidays.
In 1972, Donald Harris left the University of Madison–Wisconsin to begin a visiting professorship of economics at Stanford University.
On Nov. 3, 1976, an article published in the Stanford Daily newspaper claimed that more than 250 students were clamoring for more Marxist perspectives.
Shortly thereafter, a letter was published in the Stanford Daily on Nov. 12, 1976, signed by the Stanford branch of the Union for Radical Political Economics (URPE), with signatures from members Bill Dittenhofer, Ari Cohen, Eric Berg, David O’Connor, Arthur Slepian, Sandy Thompson, and Tracy Mott:
“The program in Marxian economics would be much weaker than it is today if had it not been for massive student efforts in the form of petitions, open meetings …
“[It] was only after a divisive one and a one-half year struggle that the opposing elements in the department gave into student pressure and conceded to ‘the appointment of Prof. Donald Harris. Thus the presence of Marxian economists here simply indicates the success of the student struggle. … The recent addition of course offerings in Marxian economics is again a direct result of student pressure, not departmental benevolence.”
After an 18-month campaign by the union, Harris was offered and accepted a permanent professorship.
The URPE (which last year celebrated its 50th anniversary) began in 1968 as a spinoff of the radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). URPE has overlapped considerably with America’s largest Marxist organization, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), since its founding in 1982. One of professor Donald Harris’ Stanford supporters and URPE letter signatories, Mott, is now a professor at the University of Denver, where he works with local DSA activists.
During the summer and fall of 2006, the DSA’s Political Action Committee helped DSA activists around the country host house parties to raise funds that helped Bernie Sanders become the “sole socialist in the U.S. Senate.”
According to DSA magazine Democratic Left: “Boulder, Colorado, guests braved a downpour to attend the party at the home of Leslie Lomas and hear a talk about giving money by economics professor and socialist Tracy Mott.”
According to The Mercury News: “Several of his former students said it wasn’t accurate to describe him [Donald Harris] as Marxist, although ‘he might have been a lot more sympathetic to Marx than a lot of other economists were at the time,’ said Tracy Mott.”
Mott was being disingenuous. Several Stanford Daily articles at the time described Donald Harris as “Marxist,” and Mott and his friends made it very clear that Harris was hired specifically for his radical ideology.
Donald Harris wrote papers such as: “The Black Ghetto as Colony: A Theoretical Critique” (1972) and “Capitalist Exploitation and Black Labor: Some Conceptual Issues” (1978).
Harris’ Marxism was never questioned or denied at any stage of his career.
URPE also was very close to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), once the largest and most influential of the far-left think tanks in Washington. Since its founding in 1963, the IPS has consistently followed a pro-Marxist line on foreign policy, defense, and economic issues.
To put its policy recommendations into action, the IPS “built networks of contacts among congressional legislators and their staffs, academics, government officials, and the national media,” according to the book: “The War Called Peace: The Soviet Peace Offensive.”
The IPS was also on very close terms with representatives of communist Cuba and the former Soviet Union.
In 1978, in an article in National Review, Brian Crozier, director of the London-based Institute for the Study of Conflict, described IPS as the “perfect intellectual front for Soviet activities which would be resisted if they were to originate openly from the KGB.”
In the 1988 book: “Winning America: Ideas and Leadership for the 1990s,” edited by IPS leaders Marcus Raskin and Chester Hartman, the IPS and DSA affiliate Sean Gervasi recommended a slate of radical colleagues as potential appointees in a hoped-for new Democratic administration after the 1988 election.
Gervasi’s wish list included the following:
• Barry Bluestone—SDS founder, DSA affiliate, URPE member. Served as a member of the senior policy staff of former Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-MO).
• Gar Alperovitz—IPS, DSA, Brookings Institute.
• Robert Browne—SDS, IPS.
• Jeff Faux—DSA affiliate. Faux has worked as an economist with the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity and the U.S. Departments of State, Commerce, and Labor.
• Carol O’Cleireacain—DSA member, Brookings Institute. In 2014, she became Detroit deputy mayor for economic policy, planning, and strategy.
And, of course, Donald Harris, Marxist professor and Kamala Harris’ father.
Republican George H.W. Bush won the 1988 election, so professor Harris stayed on at Stanford until his retirement.
Ironically, Kamala Harris’ most formidable opponent in the Democratic primary so far is Bernie Sanders, a favorite of professor Harris’ old URPE and DSA colleagues.
When Sanders drops out of a very crowded Democratic primary, will his supporters cross over to support Kamala Harris?
I believe they will. In fact, I believe it has already been decided.
Trevor Loudon is an author, filmmaker, and public speaker from New Zealand. For more than 30 years, he has researched radical left, Marxist, and terrorist movements and their covert influence on mainstream politics.
Sheesh, more cheating… and just think of the growing number of Democrats calling for the ICE agency to be abolished. Remember too that California had that whole birthing tourism scandal for foreign Chinese illegals.
5 arrested in scheme that hired people to take English proficiency exam on behalf of Chinese nationals seeking student visas
LOS ANGELES – Federal authorities this morning arrested five defendants linked to a scheme that helped Chinese nationals obtain student visas by hiring individuals who used fake Chinese passports to take an English proficiency test for the foreign students.
The arrests were made pursuant to a 26-count indictment returned on Friday by a federal grand jury. The indictment charges the defendants with conspiring to use false passports, using false passports, and aggravated identity theft as part of the scheme to impersonate Chinese nationals who were required to take the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) to obtain a student visa.
This case is being investigated by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service’s Fraud Detection National Security Section. The Educational Testing Service, which administers the TOEFL exam, has provided assistance during the investigation.“On top of allowing students to cheat their way into our top universities, schemes such as this exploit our nation’s legal immigration system and threaten our national security,” said Joseph Macias, Special Agent in Charge for HSI Los Angeles. “As this case shows, we will move aggressively to identify and prosecute those who engage in fraud and corrupt the immigration process for profit.”
The five defendants were taken into custody this morning without incident. They are:
Liu Cai, 23, of Woodland Hills, who allegedly facilitated the scheme, took at least five TOEFL exams himself and is residing in the United States on a student visa;
Quang Cao, 24, of San Francisco, who allegedly took at least four TOEFL exams with false identification, and who was arrested today in Stockton, California;
Elric Zhang, 24, of Los Angeles, who allegedly took at least five TOEFL exams as part of the scheme;
Mohan Zhang, 24, of Cerritos, who allegedly took at least two TOEFL exams under the names of foreign nationals; and
Samantha Wang, 24, of Corona, who allegedly took at least two TOEFL exams.
The four Southern California defendants are expected to be arraigned on the indictment this afternoon in U.S. District Court in downtown Los Angeles. Cao is expected to make an initial appearance this afternoon in the Eastern District of California.
The sixth defendant in the case – Tuan Tran, 33, who allegedly took at least one TOEFL exam with a false identification document – is believed to be currently residing in Taiwan.
The United States requires foreign citizens who wish to enter the United States on a temporary basis to study at a college or university to first obtain an F-1 student visa. To obtain a student visa, foreign citizens must first apply to study at a school that has been authorized by the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) to enroll foreign students. In the United States, many SEVP-certified schools require foreign citizens whose first language is not English to certify proficiency in English by achieving a particular score on the TOEFL.
When the foreign national goes to a TOEFL testing location, the test taker must present an original, non-expired, government-issued identification document recognized by their home country. According to the indictment, all six defendants used counterfeit People’s Republic of China passports to impersonate 19 different Chinese nationals at various TOEFL testing locations in and around Los Angeles.
The indictment further alleges that Cai paid for and registered 14 Chinese nationals for TOEFL exams over a one-year period in 2015 and 2016. Following the tests, Cai allegedly paid three co-defendants approximately $400 per test from his PayPal and Venmo accounts.
The conspiracy count in the indictment carries a statutory maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. The charge of using a false passport carries a maximum sentence of 10 years. Aggravated identity theft carries a mandatory consecutive two-year sentence.
This matter is being prosecuted by Special Assistant United States Attorney Kyle J. Ryan of the General Crimes section.
Donate to NoisyRoom.net
Support American Values...