Obama Epitomizes “Uncool”

By: Sharon Sebastian
Website: www.DarwinsRacists.com

There is a time in everyone’s life when they need to grow up. The President that sits in the White House clings to immature associations and views himself through the “cool” vagaries of youth long gone with every year that passes. Being “cool” is the empty vessel that floats his boat both personally and politically. The maturity that provides the gravitas to deal with America’s and the world’s problems escape him.

Personalities desperate to remain “cool” are either narcissistic or stunted or both. They yearn for “coolness” long after their expiration date. Barack Obama turned 51 years of age in the White House. It appears nothing is more important to this man, that is half a century old, than remaining “cool.” That he perceives himself more “celebrity” than president, explains his need to surround himself with celebs and rappers to confirm his “cool” cred which by now should have lost its patina. Sure, he prefers daytime talk shows instead of meeting with world leaders while the Middle East is on fire. In the wake of an American Ambassador left mutilated and dead, this sitting president goes on TV to goofily refer to himself as “eye candy,” flashing a winning smile that he hopes no one can see behind.

Immature politicians find it is easier to be glib, poke fun and hope to get by on a “cool persona.” Leadership in the White House requires maturity and an experienced skill-set to take on serious issues that impact the lives and livelihoods of over 300 million Americans. Unfortunately, this president demonstrates behavior that is not only decidedly “uncool,” but damaging to this nation.

After the first presidential debate, Obama and his camp were so devastated by Mitt Romney’s strong leadership, acumen and vision that they twisted reality. “That was not the real Romney,” they decried. Really? Fact is, “the real Obama” deep-sixed his socialist agenda during the debate. Obama would be forced to admit socialism’s history of unmitigated failure that cannot compete with free market economics. Compared to Obama’s pad-locked past, “the real Romney” is an open book with a proven record of leadership and a solid record of fiscal success as governor of Massachusetts. The Obama that has devastated this nation and buried its middle class is the Obama that Americans have come to know. The one thing that is more “un-cool” than the last four years of Barack Obama, is four more years of Barack Obama.

Under Obama, more people including Hispanics, Blacks and women, have been forced out of the middle class into either part-time work or joblessness. Example is that current unemployment has dipped to 7.8% based on the hiring of what the New York Times cites as 582,000 “involuntary workers” who are forced into PART-TIME jobs leaving Americans still under-employed or unable to find full-time jobs. In a statement, Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney clarified: “This is not what a real recovery looks like. We created fewer jobs in September than in August, and fewer jobs in August than in July, and we’ve lost over 600,000 manufacturing jobs since President Obama took office.” Romney further wrote, “If not for all the people who have simply dropped out of the labor force, the real unemployment rate would be closer to 11 percent.” Obama’s disastrous jobs record – harsh and deceptively “uncool.”

Obama’s modus operandi is destructive no matter your race or economic status. By stirring up racial unrest by portraying Blacks as victims in every perceivable way, it turns out that it is Obama who is doing the victimizing. Blacks desperately want to think of him as cool, yet they have been the most damaged. But, Obama always knew they would be first to be severely hurt as his socialist policies moor them to perpetual poverty. After four years of excruciatingly bad economic policies, Obama clearly owns the rampant unemployment among Blacks that stands at over 14%. Young Blacks suffer the most under Obama with 50% unemployed. Futures truncated, hopes dashed, families suffering under Obama is not only callous, it is the epitome of “uncool.”

To send our valiant military onto the battlefield with orders not to use their weapon unless the enemy first raises his with deadly intentions not only hamstrings our fighting forces, but is reportedly costing lives. Yet, that is what an inexperienced Commander-in-Chief Obama demands in his politically-correct military Rules of Engagement. Politico reports the following: “American soldiers, Marines and sailors have seen casualty rates more than double when the Obama administration issued new ‘Rules of Engagement’ that significantly favors the enemy and put our troops in danger. American troops are being killed in Afghanistan where the Obama administration is protecting the enemy in the name of political correctness which is getting our troops killed.” …“[Obama] is ensuring our failure in the one place he said we needed to win.” Obama has also promised young Hispanics an alternative path to citizenship if they serve in our military — should they be fortunate enough to survive. Deadly and “uncool.”

Truth about ObamaDoesNotCare, formally known as Obamacare, was exposed by New York Times Contributor, Steven Rattner, who worked in Treasury under Obama. Rattner brazenly wrote, “WE need death panels.” Though once vehemently denied, Death Panels are real and are a part of Obamacare. They are made up of an Obama staffed panel that puts a price on your survival – no matter your age or the age of a desperately ill child or parent. Rattner goes on to write that: “At the least, the Independent Payment Advisory Board should be allowed to offer changes in services [blocking treatments] and costs.” Meaning, number-crunching bureaucrats will decide what medical services you and your family will be allowed, not you or your doctor. You will have nowhere to appeal. Invasive, controlling, deadly and “uncool.”

Required by Obamacare, every American will have blood on their hands by paying for abortions via tax payers’ dollars. Obama has a stark history of assault on our most innocent. As a state senator, Obama stood on record before the Illinois Senate and adamantly sought not only late-term abortions that allow crushing the head of a living baby, but also strongly advocated that newborns that survived an abortion and are already breathing be left to die in a bin or on a shelf without medical care. Vile, inhumane and unspeakably “uncool.”

Obama gives away hundreds of billions of dollars to political cronies, failed green projects, irresponsible unions, and to Middle East infrastructure and mosque restorations while cutting Medicare by billions of dollars and financially strapping Medicaid for our mentally and physically disabled. He has aggressively blocked oil permits and a pipeline that could lead not only to jobs, but energy independence. Spinning his actions as positives — deceptively “uncool.”

The Obama campaign has put out a series of creepy e-cards. One incredibly irresponsible one encourages young female students to write home to their parents: “Dear Mom, Mitt Romney says he would repeal the Affordable Care Act. So here’s a quick question: Can I borrow $18,000 to help pay for my birth control?” The Family Research Center writes that, “If your daughter needs $18,000 worth of birth control, you have far more serious issues to deal with than the cost.” At that level of promiscuity, as encouraged by the Obama administration, it is not only “uncool,” it is creepy. What’s next, e-cards detailing how to deal with the aftermath of venereal disease and shattered self-respect? Immaturity + creepy = 51 year-old Obama and his Liberal pals running your college student’s sex life. Uncool to the point of needing a hot shower.

As his party’s nominee at a Democratic Convention where half of the delegates shouted down and denied their Creator God, by not addressing or condemning it as President of the United States either at the convention or on the campaign trail, implies consent. Eternally “uncool.”

One article cannot cover the “uncool” actions by Obama and his cohorts. From betrayals of the middle class, Blacks, and Hispanics to pending U.N. treaties that will usurp America’s sovereignty and safety, the list appears endless with more to come if Obama is re-elected. Suggestion to readers. Stand for your values and your country. Use the Comments section to add-on to the list. Email this article or its link to family and friends to post add-ons as well.

Sharon Sebastian’s insights on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdZHzMG66Kg

Sharon Sebastian (www.DarwinsRacists.com) is an author, writer, and contributor to various forms of media including cultural and political broadcasts, print, and online websites. In addition to the heated global debate on creation vs. evolution, her second book, Darwin’s Racists – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, highlights the impact of Social Darwinism’s Marxist/Socialist underpinnings on the culture, the faith and current policy out of Washington. Critics are calling Darwin’s Racists – “Incredibly Timely” and “A Book for our Times.” Sebastian’s political and cultural analyses are published nationally and internationally. Website: www.DarwinsRacists.com. “Darwin’s Racists – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow” may be ordered at: www.DarwinsRacists.com, www.Amazon.com, www.BarnesandNoble.com and at bookstores online and worldwide. Sharon Sebastian’s insights on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdZHzMG66Kg


What War On Women?

By: Trapper Pettit

Here is a simple question. When did the Republicans officially declare the ‘War on Women’? It’s really a trick question, but the answer is January 7th, 2012. The trick part of the question is that it wasn’t the Republicans who declared the war, it was the Democrats at the direction of our President and his advisors. Yeah… it stumped me too.

The first shot of this manufactured war was fired by a little piss-ant democratic operative who on this night was disguised as a debate moderator. He goes by the name of George Stephanopoulos. He happened to be the minion who fired off a round of birth control questions to the then Republican presidential candidates during the New Hampshire debates. It was one of many well-designed smoke and mirrors tactics designed to initiate cover for the wonderful job that Obama has done.

I wondered when George asked the question what the hell was up and then shortly after where they were going with it. The answer is now obvious, as I have become more versed in the democratic artful war of distraction. If I were to venture a guess, not many controlling the battle mirrors really give a rats-ass about a woman’s right to choose unless it’s politically expedient to do so. However, some like our President do care about a woman’s right to choose. I mean who would dare to call him politically expedient? And, as you ponder that statement, did you know that lions live under rocks? So, let’s call abortion what it truly is, murder. Life is life, death is death, and whenever the living takes an action to end a life, what else can you call it? It’s really not a stretch. Murder is murder.

This line of thought always leads to the debate of when is life considered life. Some say at conception, some say at the point and time a heart is developed and some like Peter Singer, the President’s Regulatory Czar, say up to two years of age. That’s right… TWO YEARS of age. A classic case of Progressive thinking at its finest.

A quick digress. If you really want to understand the mindset of a truly certifiable academic, you can Google this sick puppy. Did I mention he’s the President’s Regulatory Czar? My God people… what have we done? Sorry to show fear, but I just got through reading some of Peter Singer’s ideas on ethics and am extremely concerned about lucid nightmares for the rest of my life.

What really baffles me is the part of the debate that the conservatives don’t talk about when it comes to the woman’s right to choose. One tactic, that would serve as a quick end to this diversionary ploy being used by all the President’s men and women, is really simple. We forget that we are animals and that fairness has nothing to do with it. That in the Great Design, we are what we are and guess what? The Great Design didn’t have the rule of fairness in mind. Men plant the seed — women bear the fruit. What’s not to understand? It’s what we animals do. Fairness has nothing to do with the equation. Just because the idea instituted by the liberals that fairness is a right, doesn’t make it so. I saw my wife give birth twice. I can tell you, that ain’t fair times two.

Yet there is something the progressives never talk about and it is that a woman does have the right to choose. She actually has lots of choices. With the scientific advances in today’s world of prevention, a half dozen options come to mind. Not to mention a host of other choices in lifestyle to avoid pregnancy. Not to be blunt, but oral sex isn’t really that bad of a choice. Just ask any lesbian couple or ask any guy who… never mind. You get the point. Actually if none of the options appeal, then a woman can find a man who has made the life choice to have a vasectomy. I did and can tell you this, when you see that cold, hard, very large needle heading towards the Happy Land — that ain’t fair either. I only did it once, but it damn sure felt like twice.

What’s the bottom line? This is a false narrative designed to take the uninformed eyes off of the ball. As has been typical with the Obama administration, this effort to interject a wedge in order to divide and confuse the populace to ensure that the failed economic, foreign, energy and domestic policy remains hidden in the cloak of smoke with an occasional reflection into the mirror of lies.

So the next time you hear the words, “A woman’s right to choose,” you can do as I do. I simply think smoke and mirrors, followed with murder is murder, followed by bull and shit.


No Voting Fraud? Not so, Says John Fund at AIM Conference

Accuracy in Media

The issue of voter fraud is on the minds of many, as we are less than 30 days from the presidential election. John Fund has been one of the nation’s most prolific writers and commentators on the subject, and recently spoke at Accuracy in Media’s conference, “ObamaNation: A Day of Truth.”

Fund refutes what he refers to as “the constant mantra we hear from the critics of voter integrity laws, and that is ‘There is no voter fraud. It’s not a problem.’ All of these efforts, whether they be voter ID laws, whether they be cleaning up absentee ballot procedures, cleaning up voter registration rolls, are unnecessary. They’re a solution in search of a problem. There is no voter fraud.”

In his speech to the conference, and in his latest book, Who’s Counting? How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk, co-authored by Hans Von Spakovsky, Fund cited numerous examples which put the lie to the narrative.

Fund has written many articles about electoral irregularities for The Wall Street Journal and The New Republic. Currently he is the national affairs columnist for National Review magazine and a senior editor of The American Spectator. He’s also a frequent commentator on cable news networks such as CNBC and Fox News. In 1995 he became a member of the Journal’s editorial board where he served until turning to the role of columnist on opinionjournal.com. He also worked as a reporter for the syndicated columnists Evans and Novak.

One very recent example of voter fraud that he cited in his talk was that of a Democratic congressional candidate who had to resign because she had voted in both Florida and Maryland in four separate elections at the same time. But, as Fund explained, “There is no voter fraud.”

He said that the Justice Department refuses to properly enforce the laws or investigate the irregularities. “This Justice Department is no longer a Justice Department. It is the Ministry of Propaganda,” he said. And he pointed out that the current occupant of the White House used to be a lawyer for ACORN, the community organizing group infamous for its well-documented history of fraudulent voter registration tactics.

Watch John Fund’s interview at the conference here:

Watch John Fund’s full speech below, or watch it with the transcript here:


Joe Biden’s Marxist Confession in the VP Debate (+ full video)

By: Arlen Williams
Gulag Bound

“Why so serious?”

Attorney (self-prosecutor) that he is, The Joker summed it up at the end.

Well let me tell ya. My record stands for itself. I never say anything I don’t mean. Everybody knows, whatever I say, I do. And, uh, my whole life has been devoted to leveling the playing field for middle class people, giving them an even break.

He then spoke of people being given “a shot,” but I don’t think he was referring to The “Middle Class” Drinking Game.

So, per Biden, egalitarianism, that is, government dispensing enforced fairness, is the essence of his political philosophy. And so, he really is something of a communist, the essential slogan of which is:

Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen!
in Karl Marx’ original German

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need!
Marx, from his Critique of the Gotha Program

Then he repeated his reference to draconian landscaping twice, in his closing comment. Maybe that was because the audience had been admonished not to gasp (slide on over to about 1:26:40).

Video, full vice presidential debate, YouTube

To level a playing field, one literally has to tear down all the high points and bury or uproot anything that is growing on the soil, all over the field. That is what was done in Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, North Korea, and Eastern Europe, last century. That was the massive theft, the denial of the Right to Property, along with the tens of millions of murders involved, the denial of the Right to Life, and the ensuing state slavery, the denial of the Right to Liberty. And the right of The People to be told the truth? Forget about it.

That leveling, by incremental degree is also fundamental to Fabianist socialism, Trotskyite democracy, and Gramsci’s and Alinsky’s doctrines of stealthy governmental and NGO power and hegemony. It is the core of the global Agenda 21 program being implemented in our neighborhoods, via these doctrines (a program implemented for the United States in part via Barack Obama’s Executive Orders and EPA policies, as well as having been testbed implemented in Massachusetts by Mitt Romney, just as he testbed implemented the insurance and abortifacient mandates of RomneyCare/ObamaCare).

And now, as if according to a script, Heroine America is faced with the Marxist monster of Obama-Biden at re-election time, causing her to flee into the arms of proffered heroes, Romney-Ryan, for her rescue — each side having been financed by the central banker and crony system that has financed Agenda 21 and related means of global, kleptocratic authoritarianism. It all seems like the Marxist or Fascist Game constantly being played in Europe and South America, for those continents’ victimized voters.

Has anyone asked Mitt Romney, or Paul Ryan for that matter, about Agenda 21?

There is still time.


And as for Joe Biden, as this masterpiece by TheMouthPeace still shows and at his expense, we were warned about Obama-Biden’s intent upon structural Marxism before the last General Election. It is well worth a replay — the video that is, not the election.

Video, “The Biden Chronicles: Anatomy Of The Village Blowhard!