Give the Devil his due

Blasted Fools

How charming – the designer has even included a representation of a couple of future Democrat voters.

“Well, isn’t this special?” A group headquartered in NYC, called the ‘Satanic Temple’, is anxious to gift to Oklahoma’s State Capitol in Oklahoma City, a statue, illustrated above, depicting the god of the underworld, formerly known as the artist named Prince of Darkness. This is one of those newsy tidbits with so many shiny threads to them, that I find it extremely tempting, although it is somewhat hot to the touch – “ouch!”. I’ll be damned if this isn’t a crazy story. No doubt this is freaking out or soon to freak out many of my fellow Christian colleagues and readers. I have a somewhat different interpretation of how the situation might play out and why this might not necessarily be the dreadful, abominable event that it might seem at first crimson blush. I’ll get to that in a moment, but meanwhile, let me outline the events that led up to this.

Probably the prime factor in this is the debacle we all recognize as the controversy of the ‘Separation of Church and State’. It rears its ugly head in legal Armageddons in such diverse locales as Montgomery, Alabama and San Diego, California and has resulted in religious freedom proponents and the American Civil Liberties Union locking horns in Federal courts. Former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, was swept from the bench by a state ethics panel for defying an order to remove the Ten Commandments statue in front of the courthouse. Amazing isn’t it? An ‘ethics panel’ and the Alabama Court of the Judiciary, rejecting the Ten Commandments and its champion? And then, there is the matter of Christian symbols, most notably, the Cross, on public land.

San Diego actually has a number of crosses, but the two that sparked multi year legal wars, were the ones on Mt. Soledad and Mt. Helix. The Mt. Helix issue has been resolved, by virtue of the land beneath it being sold by the city to a private organization – the Mount Helix Park Foundation, whereas the Mt. Soledad matter is still winding it’s way through the court system. The ‘Mohave Cross’ issue was also interesting, as described to us by Death Valley Jim‘ (no-that’s not another Satan reference):

“In 2001, the ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of a man living in Oregon, that was offended by seeing the cross on federal land. A lower federal court would order the removal of the cross, and blocked the ability of the land to be transferring to the Barstow chapter of the VFW in exchange for land privately owned within the Preserve by one of its members. Liberty Institute would get involved and file an amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the VFW, The American Legion, Military Order of the Purple Heart and American Ex-Prisoners of War.

The cross remained in place during the duration of the legal battle, however it spent a number of those years boarded up inside of a box in an effort not to offend those passing by. In 2010, the Supreme Court reversed the lower courts ruling and declared that a law passed by Congress in 2003 was constitutional. This would allow the transfer of the memorial, and the land, to the VFW in exchange for private land that was within the National Preserve. Days after the verdict, on May 10th 2010 the cross that had been battled over for 10 years was stolen. Despite the missing cross the land exchange was official in April of 2012. In November of the same year the Mojave Cross was found along a road in Half Moon Bay, south of San Francisco. It was attached to a fence post with plastic ties and a note that simply read, “important historical artifact.”

Remarkable how the Frisco Bay Area (I love to say ‘Frisco’, it pisses them off up there so much), winds up inserting itself into that saga.

But back to the main topic. Religious symbols situated on public property are a guaranteed legal dustup. The Satanic Temple’s ‘Baphomet‘, presumably their corollary to the Lincoln Memorial or Lady Liberty, is no exception. “The monument has been designed to reflect the views of Satanists in Oklahoma City and beyond. The statue will serve as a beacon calling for compassion and empathy among all living creatures. The statue will also have a functional purpose as a chair where people of all ages may sit on the lap of Satan for inspiration and contemplation,” spokesman Lucien Greaves explained. Compassion and empathy – Satan? What are they smoking in that Temple back there in NYC?

Satan, even seated, is 7 feet tall. Why the heck hasn’t someone from an NBA team tried to sign him? He’d be a cancer in the locker room? Bloomberg Business Week reports that even more diverse organizations are lining up to get into the act. PETA wants to hang a banner that encourages people to stop eating meat, the Universal Society of Hinduism wants to donate a statue of the Hindu deity Hanuman, and the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (say what? – somebody has lost their noodle!), wishes to donate a pasta-related memorial. Oklahoma, according to Bloomberg, is not amused. In response to the flood of unusual memorial requests, the state voted to place a ban on new statues at the statehouse. My guess would be that this is a tactic designed to freeze out ‘old Scratch’ from setting up his throne on the Capitol lawn.

The Satanic Temple in NYC. Grand isn’t it?

Bloomberg also interviewed Lucien Greaves, the co-founder of the Satanic Temple and the Devil’s spokeshole. Here is the conversation:

Bloomberg: First, tell me a little bit about the Satanic Temple. What do you guys believe in?
Lucien: We organized in the beginning of 2013. Thousands of people have joined officially online, but of course their level of activity ranges dramatically. There’s a core group of us who are actually active. We look at Satan as a literary construct, not so much in line with the Christian demonology but more as he is in Anatole France’s [1914 book], Revolt of the Angels, where he rebels against arbitrary authority in favor of personal sovereignty. (Editor’s note – so now Satan is being re-cast as a ‘Tea-Partier’ or Libertarian?)
Bloomberg: So do you “slaughter goats and drink their blood in public,” as a religious panel on Fox News implied?
Lucien: Oh, no. Not at all. I think we’ve made that clear. I’m atheist, myself.
Bloomberg: OK, so tell me a little bit about this monument. How did the idea come about?
Lucien: We have members in Oklahoma. They reached out to us and told us about the Ten Commandments statue being placed there. When the ACLU sued, the state responded by saying it had actually envisioned a monument park and additional monuments could be added. We felt that was an invitation for more statues, so we decided to donate one.
Bloomberg: How did you raise the money?
Lucien: We have an Indiegogo campaign and hit our fundraising goal [of $17,000] yesterday morning. Right now we’re over $22,000, and people are still donating, so the monument will definitely be made. We have a 3D rendering of what it’ll look like, and we’re currently shopping around to find out where to get it constructed.
Bloomberg: The statue depicts a goat-man and children. What does it mean?
Lucien: Originally I had this idea of a four-legged goat creature with a saddle that children could sit upon, but it ended up looking a little too silly. So we went with this. It’s an image of Baphemot, the occult figure that the Knights Templar were (editor’s note – falsely) accused of worshiping in the 12th century during the crusades. In a way, it represents the hysterical witch-hunting fears of the past and our new empathetic drive to look more rationally at things.
Bloomberg: How have people reacted to all this?
Lucien: Surprisingly, the flood of support we’ve gotten far outweighs the hate mail. A lot of e-mails we get from people start out with them letting us know that they consider themselves Christian but support us on the basis of constitutional freedom. They understand we’re not assaulting them. We’re upholding our freedom to maintain a pluralistic nation where all voices can be heard and where we don’t discriminate on the basis of religion or creed.
Bloomberg: What do you think about Oklahoma’s moratorium on new statues?
Lucien: We haven’t been made aware of it officially. When we decided to donate a statue, we went through all the proper channels. We submitted a letter to the Capitol Preservation Commission, and they sent us back the paperwork we needed to fill out. All this happened before the moratorium, so as far as I’m concerned it shouldn’t apply to us retroactively. I’m not sure if the Hindus or PETA got in before the moratorium passed, but we did. No one has told us that there would be a change in our application status.
Bloomberg: I have to be honest with you, it seems unlikely that the Oklahoma government is going to erect a statue to Satan in front of its capitol. What will you do if you get denied?
Lucien: That would be then something for the lawyers to hash out. But if we fight the battle to the bitter end, and it turns out we can’t have our statue, we’ll try to place it elsewhere. We’ll move on to the next place (Obama’s Presidential Library in Chicago?).
Bloomberg: So you’re willing to go to court on this?
Lucien: Oh yeah.

Alright, now I get to throw my 3 cents in on all this and I know I’m going to catch Hell on it, but that’s O.K., I can take the heat. Would we ideally, just as soon not see a statue of the fallen angel nataS, (allegedly) spoken of in ‘backward masking’ on 70′s era rock albums, or depicted on countless death metal album covers? Of course not. But it might happen, no matter what. Remember, the Bible speaks of Satan as the ‘god of this World‘ (2nd Corinthians 4:4), so despite his sordid reputation, maybe we could take a Lemon here and make Lemonade out of it.

We used to take family trips across the country when my son was young and on one occasion we followed the Southern route back to the Cornhusker State, where my wife is from. You take old Highway 54 for a good part of the way, through New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma and then into Kansas and Nebraska. If the statue of that Old Serpent, the father of lies (not you, Barack, but nice try anyway), had been at the Oklahoma capitol at that time, why we might have added a couple hundred miles to the trip, just to go there and check it out. What better way to illustrate to your children that if they don’t accept Jesus, they could wind up hanging out for eternity with that stinkin’ piece of spiritual garbage? Not to mention the fact that Christian groups are always keen on finding appropriate settings for confronting sinners with the consequences of unrepented sin. Talk about low hanging fruit! What could be more ideal that to use Slewfoot’s graven, grotesque and repulsive image as a counterpoint to the good promises of the Gospel? Civics groups and history buffs could conduct tours discussing the origins of politics. I don’t mean to unfairly demonize anyone here.

What’s next? Will Satan get a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame? He does have a lot of friends in TinselTown, after all. Isn’t this crooked, just a bit?

Aside from that, it would no doubt give Oklahoma a tourism shot in the arm and the next time a tornado rolls through and wreaks massive devastation, people can chalk it up to Satan’s presence in their midst, and even possibly drag the Satanic Temple into court for their role in introducing this monster, to whom various and sundry evil happenings could be attributed. The sponsors of the statue admit that they are a religious sect, even though Mr. Greaves, (whose name would be even more interesting spelled Graves), claims to be an atheist. And of course, Satan himself lays claim to be a religious cult figure – sorry once again, Mr. President. Therefore, it is probably not legally possible to exclude ‘the Adversary’ from situating himself on Capitol grounds, due to his rights under the 14th Amendment. Hey, if corporations can be people, why the devil can’t the devil be a people? And, one more plus, it might be better to have Beelzebub out in clear sight where we can keep an eye on him, instead of him ‘living in the shadows of society’.

Put a fork in me, I’m done.


Violence Threatens to Thwart Iraqi Oil Resurgence

A wave of violence has swept parts of Iraq at the start of 2014 as the central government fights back against Al-Qaeda aligned militants in Anbar Province. The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) reportedly took control of Ramadi and Fallujah, bombing police headquarters and killing dozens. On New Year’s Day Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki sent in reinforcements to take back control of Anbar Province’s two largest cities. The clashes kick off 2014 in much the same way as 2013 ended – a return to violence in a country that had seen important security gains in recent years.

Over 7,800 civilians were killed in Iraq in 2013, the bloodiest year over the past five. The latest violence occurred in Anbar Province, a region that dogged the U.S. military during its decade-long war. ISIL is also engaged in fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, and the latest string of events indicates that the violence of the Syrian civil war is spreading deeper into Iraq.

The conflict has yet to affect Iraq’s oil fields, and production hit 3.2 million barrels per day (bpd) in December, the most since August 2013, according to Bloomberg. To be sure, the violence does not pose an immediate threat to Iraq’s oil output, as three-fourths of the country’s production comes from the South, and much of the rest from Kurdistan in the North. In fact, according to the EIA, a majority of Iraq’s oil production comes from three fields – Kirkuk, and the North and South Rumaila fields near Basra. The latest violence is not located near these areas.

Still, the instability and the loss of control of key cities by the Iraqi government underscores the intense security challenge facing the country as it seeks to ramp up oil production in the coming years. Iraq has a stated goal of tripling oil production to 9 million bpd by 2020. In a 2012 special report on Iraq, the IEA estimates a slightly less rosy figure of 6.1 million bpd by the end of the decade in its central scenario.

With the immense challenges facing Iraq’s oil sector, even doubling today’s output over the next six years looks rather ambitious. Iraq still has not agreed on a hydrocarbons law that would outline oil governance. Kurdistan is making brazen moves aimed at increasing its independence from the central government in Baghdad. This may help to boost Kurdish oil production, but political conflict between the semi-autonomous region and the Maliki government casts a shadow of uncertainty over the country’s oil industry. Most importantly, however, is the violence that threatens the stability of Iraq, which is now the second largest OPEC producer after Saudi Arabia.

While Iraq’s failure to meet its ambitious oil production goals may seem to be a problem solely for Iraq, oil consumers around the world may be more dependent than they realize on the oil fields of Rumaila and Kirkuk. Over the next 20 years, according to the IEA’s latest World Energy Outlook, Iraq will account for the largest source of additional oil production to global markets. Yet, its failure to live up to those hopeful projections – and given the latest reports of violence, that seems entirely plausible – will send prices much higher than the 2035 price of $128 per barrel that the IEA predicts, as supply does not keep pace with demand.

Source: http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Wave-of-Violence-Threatens-Ambitious-Iraqi-Oil-Goals.html

By. Nicholas Cunningham of Oilprice.com


Will King Obama Throw Nuns into the Lion’s Den?

By: Lloyd Marcus

For 175 years the nuns of Little Sisters of the Poor have been ministering to the elderly, poor and dying. Under decree mandated in Obamacare, the Little Sisters are ordered to bow down in worship to King Obama’s golden idol, abortion. Non compliance threatens to be the death of their extraordinary ministry. http://bit.ly/18m73VP

We are witnessing a modern day version of King Darius ordering that Daniel be thrown into the lion’s den for refusing to deny his faith. Either the Little Sisters of the Poor ministry submit to King Obama’s decree or die; metaphorically thrown into the lion’s den.

Displaying deceit characteristic of our Liar-in-Chief, Obama’s DOJ have offered the Little Sisters a serpent disguised as an olive branch. The DOJ told the Little Sisters that if they would simply sign a document condoning abortion services for their employees an exemption from the mandate would be granted.

The wise Little Sisters refused to sign what they perceived to be a “permission slip” for abortion services; a back door scheme by the DOJ to get the Little Sisters to betray their religious faith.

Like Daniel in his day, the Little Sisters remain faithful. Their case has gone to the U.S. Supreme Court. http://bit.ly/1d7moQI

It is profoundly evil to persecute a Christian ministry that has been ministering to the needy for 175 years. Surely, the DOJ has to know that legally bludgeoning the Little Sisters of the Poor into submission will be a PR nightmare for the Obama Administration.

So why is Obama’s DOJ hellbent on forcing the Little Sisters to betray their commitment to God? The answer is our country is under siege in the process of a tyrannical hostile takeover.

The Obama Administration has transformed governmental agencies into his iron-fist enforcers. Their laser focused mission is to assist in the full implementation of the liberal socialist/progressive agenda; Obama’s vowed fundamental transformation of America.

Like every hostile takeover by a regime, opposition is dealt with swiftly and severely. Everyone must be politically beaten into silence and submission; even the Little Sisters of the Poor.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman: Conservative Campaign Committee