China’s Secret Speech: Pandemic Plan to Murder 200 Million Americans

Jim Simpson for Congress

In light of the coronavirus crisis, author, columnist, and national security expert J.R. Nyquist recently republished a secret speech given by Chinese general Chi Haotian somewhere around 2002 — the exact date isn’t known — to senior members of the Chinese Communist Party. In the speech, Chi describes how China’s population growth cannot be contained within the borders of China. This, and nationalistic themes eerily reminiscent of Hitler, is used to justify China’s intended takeover of America, where Americans will be given a choice: leave or die.

I suggest you read the entire speech. Then read it again. The current SARS virus, COVID-19, was a bioweapon, manufactured in Wuhan’s Biosafety Level 4 laboratory. Recall that the original SARS epidemic also came from China. This is not a coincidence.

In a January Netflix documentary titled “Pandemic,” Dr. Dennis Carroll, director of the Emerging Threats Unit at the US Agency for International Development, warned: “While we can’t predict where the next influenza pandemic is going to come from, there are certain places that need particular attention – and China is one of those. It’s the place where we have seen the emergence of virtually all of the deadly influenza viruses over the last half-century.”

While Dr. Carroll did not mention bioweapons explicitly, why else should he be so worried about China specifically? What follows suggests the answer. I have chosen a few choice excerpts from the speech itself, which detail both the Chinese plans and their justifications.

What you should understand is that none of this is in the least surprising to anyone familiar with Communist strategies and tactics. Communism is the greatest evil ever unleashed on mankind. We have been anesthetized to that fact by endless propaganda, lies and sheer ignorance promulgated in Western media, Hollywood, our educational institutions, and culture. This has been aided and abetted by the human mind’s unwillingness to believe that anyone (except maybe Hitler), could be so systematically evil, helped with a large dose of political and economic self-interest enjoyed by those who have chosen to interact and trade with the Chinese.

Haotian starts by optimistically reporting an online survey of young Chinese they had conducted. The survey revealed that over 80 percent would willingly “shoot at women, children, and prisoners of war,” thus removing the worry that the up-and-coming generation might not have the stomach for mass murder. He explains that their rationale for conducting the survey was to discover, “If China’s global development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it?”

Excerpt 1. Discusses the problem of targeting America, or any nation, for colonization by masses of the Chinese population:

To resolve the issue of America we must be able to transcend conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conquered land because back then you could not kill people effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with rifles or machine guns. Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the people on that land. However, if we conquered America in this fashion, we would not be able to make many people migrate there.

Excerpt 2. Discusses the means by which America can be safely depopulated, “cleaned up,” to make room for the Chinese:

Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles, and battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons… Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio-weapons have been invented one after another. Of course, we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of “cleaning up” America all of a sudden… Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die.

These are not idle plans. Remember, Haotian is making recommendations to the top officials of the Chinese Communist Party.

COVID-19, Image by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID), Rocky Mountains Laboratories (RML), via ScienceAlert.com [GB]

Excerpt 3. Describes how they must prepare if they are to be successful in the planned use of bioweapons in an offensive attack:

We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack, the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities…

It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century in which the CCP leads the world… (Emphasis added.)

Gen. Haotian concludes:

[A]s long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan but in fact, is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites.

Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of China’s century. As war approaches, I am full of hope for our next generation.

Some believe the COVID-19 outbreak was deliberate. While they shut down travel within China, the Communists allowed air travel to continue, thereby deliberately contaminating the world with the virus, killing over 200,000 to date, and shattering the world economy.

A lot could be said for this theory. It may have been a distraction to take the world’s eyes off Hong Kong, where the Communists are now suppressing the pro-freedom protesters and completing their takeover. Also, President Trump is the first-ever president to actually stand up to the Communist Chinese. What better way to derail his efforts and poison his reelection prospects than by inflicting this national emergency?

It may have been so. I continue to believe this was an erroneously leaked bioweapon. First, we learned of the leak from a brave Chinese researcher who later died of COVID-19. Then the Chinese Communists moved into CYA overdrive, shutting everything down and pointing fingers at the U.S. — classic Communist face-saving actions. A deliberate release would have been better hidden and the virus would have been more virulent, as this secret plan makes clear will be their intention.

Either way, Communist China is working on bioweapons and the secret speech makes clear that they do intend to use them against us at some point in a massive surprise attack. So this pandemic may actually be our savior, in that it has alerted us to all the issues we have with China, many of which we were unaware, and now, hopefully, the widespread dissemination of this speech, will underscore just how dangerous this regime is to the United States and the world.

Currently running for Congress (R) in Maryland’s CD-2, James M. Simpson is an economist, author, and investigative journalist. His latest book is “The Red Green Axis: Refugees, Immigration and the Agenda to Erase America.” Follow Jim on Twitter and Facebook.

Hat Tip: Gulag Bound


5 Eyes Has Memo/Evidence on China Virus Deception

By: Denise Simon | Founders Code

Primer: Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo is correct, China is using the same fake/false propaganda tactics well known and exploited for decades by Russia’s FSB. Further, while Beijing refuses to allow foreign (read U.S.) scientists into the Wuhan Laboratory for review/investigation, Beijing is also refusing WHO scientists as well.

China sends thousands of medical staff to Wuhan as ...


FNC: A research dossier compiled by the so-called “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance states that China intentionally hid or destroyed evidence of the coronavirus outbreak, resulting in the loss of tens of thousands of lives around the world.

The 15-page document from the intelligence agencies of the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Australia, and New Zealand, was obtained by Australia’s Daily Telegraph newspaper and states that China’s secrecy amounted to an “assault on international transparency.”

The dossier touches on themes that have been discussed in media reports about the outbreak of the virus, including the initial denial that the virus could be transmitted between humans, the silencing or “disappearing” of doctors who tried to speak up, the destruction of evidence in laboratories and refusal to provide live samples to international scientists working on a vaccine.

Specifically, the file notes that China began censoring news of the virus on search engines beginning Dec. 31, deleting terms including “SARS variation, “Wuhan Seafood market” and “Wuhan Unknown Pneumonia.”

Three days later, on Jan. 3, China’s National Health Commission, ordered virus samples to be either moved to designated testing facilities or destroyed, while simultaneously enforcing a “no-publication order” related to the disease.

Perhaps most damningly, the dossier states that Chinese authorities denied that the virus could be spread between humans until Jan. 20, “despite evidence of human-human transmission from early December.”

The dossier is similarly unsparing about the World Health Organization (WHO), stating that it toed the Chinese line about human-to-human transmission despite the fact that ”officials in Taiwan raised concerns as early as December 31, as did experts in Hong Kong on January 4.”

As of Friday night, the WHO’s official Twitter account still featured a tweet from Jan. 14 that stated: “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan#China.”

At the same time, the dossier states that throughout February, “Beijing [pressed] the US [sic], Italy, India, Australia, Southeast Asian neighbors and others not to protect themselves via travel restrictions, even as [China] imposes severe restrictions at home.”

At the same time, the file states: “Millions of people [left] Wuhan after the outbreak and before Beijing lock[ed] down the city on January 23.”

The dossier continues the litany of Chinese defensiveness, stating: “As EU [European Union] diplomats prepare a report on the pandemic, [China] successfully presses Brussels to strike language on [China] disinformation.”

Similarly, “As Australia calls for an independent inquiry into the pandemic, [China] threatens to cut off trade with Australia. [China] has likewise responded furiously to US [sic] calls for transparency.”

The Telegraph report does present one point of divergence between the allied governments, with Australia believing the virus most likely originated in the Wuhan wet market and putting the chances it accidentally leaked from a lab at “5 percent.”

By contrast, Fox News reported April 15 that U.S. intelligence officials are increasingly confident that coronavirus likely originated in a Wuhan lab as a consequence of China’s attempt to demonstrate that its efforts to identify and combat viruses are equal to or greater than the capabilities of the United States

President Trump said Thursday that he’s seen evidence suggesting the virus came from a lab after Fox News and others asked if he knew of anything that gave him confidence that the outbreak originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“Yes, I have,” he replied, “And, I think that the World Health Organization should be ashamed of themselves because they’re like the public relations agency for China.”

Multiple sources previously told Fox News that it is believed standards in Wuhan were disregarded before the virus leaked, prompting Beijing to initiate a cover-up. Sources also claimed the WHO was complicit from the beginning in helping China cover its tracks.

The WHO and China have denied any wrongdoing.

The Telegraph also reported that key figures at the Wuhan Institute of Virology previously worked or trained in Australian government labs where they conducted research on pathogens in live bats as part of an ongoing partnership with the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

According to the dossier, the team’s work at the Wuhan lab involved discovering samples of coronavirus within a cave in Yunnan province and synthesizing a bat-derived coronavirus that could not be cured.



November 9, 2015:

Wuhan Institute of Virology publishes a study revealing they created a new virus in the lab from SARS-CoV.

December 6, 2019

Five days after a man linked to Wuhan’s seafood market presented pneumonia-like symptoms, his wife contracts it, suggesting human to human transmission.

December 27

China’s health authorities told a novel disease, then affecting some 180 patients, was caused by a new coronavirus.

December 26-30

Evidence of a new virus emerges from Wuhan’s patient data.

December 31

Chinese internet authorities begin censoring terms from social media such as Wuhan Unknown Pneumonia.

January 1, 2020

Eight Wuhan doctors who warned about the new virus are detained and condemned.

January 3

China’s top health authority issues gag order.

January 5

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission stops releasing daily updates on new cases. That continues until January 18.

January 10

PRC official Wang Guangfa says outbreak “under control” and mostly a “mild condition”.

January 12

Professor Zhang Yongzhen’s lab in Shanghai is closed by authorities for “rectification”, one day after it shares genomic sequence data with the world for the first time.

January 14

PRC National Health Commission chief Ma Xiaowei privately warns colleagues the virus is likely to develop into a major public health event.

January 24

Officials in Beijing prevent the Wuhan Institute of Virology from sharing sample isolates with the University of Texas.

February 6

China’s internet watchdog tightens controls on social media platforms.

February 9

Citizen-journalist and local businessman Fang Bin disappears.

April 17

Wuhan belatedly raises its official fatalities by 1290.


A Bible, We Have a Bible

By: T.F. Stern | Self-Educated American

I was reading the comment section of a Christian fellowship group and found it interesting, not surprising; but interesting these good people rejected the Book of Mormon as being the word of God on the premise that the Bible was complete and any attempt to include additional scripture was ludicrous.  You could feel them bristle at the mention of any additional scripture.

Rather than be confrontational, something I tend to enjoy; but rather than jump into their comfort zone it might be better to wait at least a day (and then jump on them)… and consider how best to introduce them to a marvelous work and wonder, one which they’ve been instructed to avoid as if it were evil in nature.

I’ve always wanted to know who began telling folks to avoid reading the Book of Mormon and for what purpose?  Why avoid reading information that might actually be from God, information that wasn’t in the canon scriptures of the Bible?  Are you going to let someone tell you what you believe or wouldn’t you rather find out on your own?

Could it have been members of the clergy, individuals who feared they might lose their congregations were they to find the true Church?   I ask only because this certainly was the situation in Jerusalem during Christ’s ministry.

The Sanhedrin, those holding religious power, those responsible for teaching the Law of Moses felt more than a little uneasy about this “new guy” going around preaching doctrine “as if he had authority”.  They didn’t like having to admit the possibility that all the prophesies they’d learned might actually have come to pass with this individual, Jesus of Nazareth, son of a poor carpenter, a man, nothing more than a man; but whom many considered to be the Messiah.  If Jesus was the Messiah the Sanhedrin would then be out of business.

How did the disciples of Jesus determine He was the Messiah?  Then take that same test to determine what is scripture and what is poppy-cock; a test that conforms to the standards set forth in the New Testament.

You’ll find the answer on how to determine all things by carefully reading in Matthew 16, starting in verse 13.

“When Jesus came into the coasts of Cæsarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.

He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.” (emphasis added)

I return to the original topic being discussed by the fellowship group, those who so quickly dismissed the Book of Mormon as being worthy to be considered scripture.

A long history of the Bible’s compilation was offered as if it were the “be all end all”, the “ace in the hole” that would trump any discussion regarding the Bible already being complete, that nothing could be added.

I was waiting for Ed McMahan of the old Johnny Carson Show to toss in his familiar challenge line, “Everything you always wanted to know about the Bible….”  At which time Johnny would look into the camera, pause and put on his boyish grin, followed by, “Not everything, Metamucil breath…”

With only a limited search on Wikipedia anyone could find pages and pages about the Christian biblical canon, “the Fifty Bibles of Constantine, the First Council of Nicaea and their determination on the canon, and that by the fifth century the East, with a few exceptions, had come to accept the Book of Revelation and thus had come into harmony on the matter of the canon, at least for the New Testament.”

Perhaps the single most important sentence in all that was offered regarding the Bible as being complete as a canon of scripture, “The idea of a complete and clear-cut canon of the New Testament existing from the beginning, that is from Apostolic times, has no foundation in history.”  (emphasis added)

What does the Book of Mormon have to say about individuals who are too stiff-necked to read and consider other scripture that God intended for His children to have?

The introduction to the contents found in 2 Nephi 29 of the Book of Mormon reads, “Many Gentiles will reject the Book of Mormon—They will say, We need no more Bible—The Lord speaks to many nations—He will judge the world out of the books which will be written.”

“And because my words shall hiss forth—many of the Gentiles shall say: A Bible! A Bible! We have got a Bible, and there cannot be any more Bible.

But thus saith the Lord God: O fools, they shall have a Bible; and it shall proceed forth from the Jews, mine ancient covenant people. And what thank they the Jews for the Bible which they receive from them? Yea, what do the Gentiles mean? Do they remember the travails, and the labors, and the pains of the Jews, and their diligence unto me, in bringing forth salvation unto the Gentiles?”

I’ll end with an invitation and a warning.  Read the Book of Mormon with the idea that perhaps, just perhaps those who’ve been telling you that God’s words could only be found in the Bible, or that He had nothing more to say to His children; perhaps they were mistaken; or worse, afraid you might find the true church of Jesus Christ.


His Church is the Kingdom of Heaven

By: T.F. Stern | Self-Educated American

This morning I enjoyed reading another Facebook entry by my good friend Bob Kersten.  His topic centered on the meaning of the Kingdom of God as he shared his ideas on what that meant.  He referenced the Lord’s Prayer, specifically, “Thy kingdom come.  Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.” Most Christians recognize Matthew 6:10 as being part of the Lord’s Prayer.

My friend highlighted a quote from a book written by John C. Nugent,  Endangered Gospel, a thought he concurred with.  “His conviction is that we, the Church are to be a preview of the consummated kingdom of God that Jesus Christ came to earth to inaugurate.”  I’d have to agree as well.

In our day, where do we find that church in which Jesus Christ came to earth to inaugurate?  Does it exist or did the formal Church vanish with the passing of the last apostle within only a few years after having been established?  No doubt the great apostasy lasted for hundreds of years.  Then, with the dawning of the Renaissance came an awakening of the human spirit along with the awareness of man’s relationship with God.

Michelangelo’s depiction of God’s finger giving life to Adam as painted on the Sistine Chapel ceiling may be one of the best summations of this relationship.    (Image courtesy of pinterest.com)

Keeping in mind that the Lord requires that His church here on earth be organized and run the way it was when Jesus Christ established it during his ministry in the flesh, is there any one church that can lay claim to this?

“The Kingdom of God on earth is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (D&C 65). The purpose of the Church is to prepare its members to live forever in the celestial kingdom or kingdom of heaven. However, the scriptures sometimes call the Church the kingdom of heaven, meaning that the Church is the kingdom of heaven on earth.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the kingdom of God on the earth, but it is at present limited to an ecclesiastical kingdom. During the Millennium, the kingdom of God will be both political and ecclesiastical.”

Those last two paragraphs almost certainly will annoy or aggravate quite a few individuals; however, since I’m expressing my belief and sharing it for the sole purpose of enlightening folks that the Church which Jesus Christ established during his mortal ministry, that same Church has been restored in our day, then you’re obligated by the Savior Himself to forgive my boldness.  His Church will never again be taken from the earth as we await the Second Coming of our Lord and Savior, even Jesus Christ.  Amen.