By: Trevor Loudon
New Zeal
I can’t decide, can you?
I’ve been sent some cover design roughs for my new book. I’m down to these two basic options.
The book exposes more than 60 U.S. Senators and Congressmen who have ties to the Communist Party USA, Democratic Socialists of America or other Marxist organizations.
The book tells who they are, who they work with, what there agendas are and how they work against America every day Congress is in session.
I think both cover designs convey a sense of this. But which one do you think does it better? Please post a comment with your opinion and any suggestions you might have. I shall read every one with keen interest.
Thank you
Trevor Loudon
Christchurch
New Zealand
My book will be officially launched, August 20, 2013, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.
However, copies will be available a little before that date. If you’re a United States resident, you can be one of the first to own one!
Pre-order today!
You’re right Trevor. It’s a difficult choice. The first proposed book cover is more traditional and I like it, but the 2nd one grabs your attention. Think how that will look at the bookstores! If displayed on a kiosk, people could see it at a distance and be drawn to it. The cover also makes a nice poster for display purposes. Since so many in the House of Reps and the Senate are neo-con RINO’s or Marxist-leaning Dems, the coloration of the Congress Building is pretty much on target. There are two few constitutional and conservative patriots up there anymore.
I find the first cover easier to recognize and decode; after seeing the first one I can tell what the second one’s meant to convey, but without the first one the second one might not convey any meaning. To me, anyway. I’m not a very visual thinker.
I might vote for the second cover, but perhaps with a small hammer and sickle symbol worked in there somewhere on the top half of the page.
You can’t go wrong with either cover. The top cover would be the more conservative choice, while the bottom cover would be the more daring choice, as it seems to portray an almost supernaturally evil glow emanating from within the Capitol Dome.