By: Thomas Wigand | New Zeal
In this piece, we will first look at the retirement of “economics” (economic class) as the stated mission of Marxists, and economics replacement by an unstated subterfuge – so-called identity politics.
Then we will examine how the so-called social justice warriors (SJWs) are useful idiot pawns, unwittingly advancing a larger, consummately evil agenda; ironically helping to install the very command and control by a mega-wealthy elite that they claim to despise. The progenitors of that agenda mostly work off of the radar, for now. Behind the scenes they are funding the SJWs, thus enabling them to prepare the public battlespace, all the while setting up for a big coming-out party in January 2021. More on that below.
IDENTITY POLITICS a/k/a PROGRESSIVE APARTHEID
For years now we’ve heard the term identity politics and how the Progressives-Democrats are using it to cobble-together an electoral majority (we’re all now in forced familiarity with the major categories of “identity” – race; gender; the constantly expanding list of LGBT categories).
In a country founded upon the principle that “all men are created equal, endowed by our Creator,” identity politics as pursued by the Progressives–Democrats is unreconcilable with our founding. Indeed, we could justly call it subversive.
Henceforth, we will refer to their identity politics as Progressive Apartheid – for it is Balkanizing the country, and doing so by political design. It does this by selecting certain demographic characteristics (the “identity”), and then conditioning members of the targeted identities to see the world through a manufactured lens. Once that is achieved, they will have been successfully manipulated to a degree that they will act (e.g., vote) in an intended manner.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, classic economic-based Marxism (“revolution by the proletariat” and such) went out of style: Soviet gulags, Cambodian killing fields and majority poverty (i.e., except for Party officials and other nomenklatura) do not a successful marketing campaign make, not when your goal is to go global. But the evil force did not disappear. Instead, Marxism rebranded into so-called social justice (which now emboldened, is increasingly revealing its true nature with the public emergence of Democratic Socialists). Progressive Apartheid is the centerpiece of so-called social justice.
To illustrate this rebranding, consider the “before and after” listing of words and phrases below; the pattern will become self-evident. As you read think back, and you’ll remember that the Progressive-Marxists often change or add to their menu of words and phrases – this helps keeps the agenda masked while expanding its scope. Also, those words and phrases are often dog whistles – meaning something innocuous, or even desirable to the average person – but having an entirely different meaning to the Marxists.
A perfect example of a Progressive-Marxist dog whistle is the word equity – seemingly out of nowhere it is now embedded within the “diversity and inclusion” slogan that’s been ubiquitous across the media, academia and corporate America for several years now. “Diversity, equity and inclusion” is now the Progressive-Marxist officially approved phrase.
If your company has not already updated its slogan to add “equity,” it soon will. In the topsy-turvy world of Progressive-Marxism and its political correctness, “celebrating diversity” requires uniformity in conformity.
[The coordination accompanying the rollout of these dog whistles is a wonder to behold. It would be fascinating to know who is behind the creation, selection, and then issuance of the marching orders to execute the new word(s) and phrase(s). And the network through which the orders are disseminated. It’s almost as if somewhere out there resides a secret, 1984-like Newspeak bureau. Oh, to expose it! (Are you listening, Project Veritas?)]
Equity as traditionally understood is a perfectly just and desirable concept. But when one examines how the Marxists are peddling “equity,” it becomes clear that they’re dog-whistling it into a new definition – Marxist “equality of outcome” (rather than equal opportunity). In other words, universal race and gender quotas (e.g., in educational admissions, hiring, and promotion, income – pay scales, and housing). Oh, and reparations.
Now that your antennae are up, peruse this list (Marxist words and phrases in alphabetical order, followed by the Progressive Apartheid equivalent):
Bourgeoisie (Kulak) = Whites / “White privilege”
Capitalism = systemic racism
Capitalist = White
Comrade = anti-racist / anti-fascist / woke
Dialectic (Marxist) = woke; justice (social justice, environmental justice, racial justice, justice ad nauseum)
False Consciousness = implicit / unconscious bias; non-woke
Fellow Travelers = woke; anti-racist
“Peace, Land and Bread” = “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion”
Petty bourgeoisie = deplorables
Proletariat = Black–Black Lives Matter / Hispanic / LGBT / [illegal] immigrant
Reactionary / counter-revolutionary = racist
“… rule of the bourgeois democrats, from the very first, will carry within it the seeds of its own destruction” = climate change (caused by an “unsustainable” free market economy)
“Workers’ paradise” = sustainable
Workers of the World Unite! = anti-racist / anti-fascist
THE END GAME
Marxism rides in on the backs of useful idiots and the desperate, who are fed utopian visions and other lies on their revolutionary journey. Progressive Apartheid (and so-called climate change) are Marxism rebranded. Under the banners of social justice and sustainability, the SJW useful idiots are setting the stage for the imposition of a global social justice dystopia (one very much intended to be “sustainable” all right, but not in the way they think).
We could describe this end-game as Corporatist Communism – a hybrid mixture comprising elements of both “classic” Marxist Communism (i.e., its aspirations for control of the entire globe and its population) and “classic” Fascism (i.e., its corporatist “private enterprise” structure, but without its nationalistic or ethnic focus).
Corporatist Communism is visioned to comprise an axis of multinational corporations (e.g., the tech industry), the United Nations and related NGO’s, and central banks – jointly exercising global power (see the reference to Transnational Progressivism below).
In so doing, they would supplant the power and influence nation-states and their elected officials (those may still be allowed to exist for symbolic usefulness, but will be neutered). If successfully imposed, we would all end up living under a globalists’ totalitarian regime – unelected, unaccountable, and vehemently anti-Christian.
[A quick aside: The very fact that there are “Socialists” and “Democratic Socialists” and “Antifa” and “trained Marxists” (e.g., the founders of “Black Lives Matter”) and “Communists” – openly agitating both in the streets and within the commanding heights of the Democrat Party, for “change” and similarly trite slogans, without opposition from, but with the support of “private capital” – proves that they are quintessential useful idiots serving the interests of the corporate and financial oligarchs.
This explains why the large companies and wealthy individuals and foundations that would rightly consider a pure Communist (or Socialist) revolution as an existential threat, are instead all on-board with Progressive Apartheid and climate change/sustainability. They are all-in “woke”— financially supporting organizations like Black Lives Matter and Democrat candidates. This would not be the case if it were not in their financial and power interests.
Those elite interests calculate that by the time the young wokesters realize that they’ve been duped, it’ll be too late; that they’ll end up corralled-in alongside the other “less equal” animals laboring on the globalist Animal Farm.]
This totalitarian model will undoubtedly be portrayed as “democratic.” The “people” might even be allowed to “vote” for representatives at a supra-national legislative or representative body (e.g., modeled on the European Parliament). But as with that EU body, its actual role would be symbolic, existing merely to maintain an illusion of “democracy.” The real high-level decision-making power will reside behind the curtain, and will then be executed by unelected and unaccountable police and regulatory bureaucracy, reminiscent of the Soviet Union’s nomenklatura.
The groundwork for this has been erected over decades: including via the climate change fraud; Cultural Marxism and Progressive Apartheid. And most recently, Covid-19 and especially the response thereto; this directly from the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset home page:
The Covid-19 crisis, and the political, economic, and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making … As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models, and the management of a global commons.
Never let a good crisis go to waste, eh WEF?
Cultural Marxism and climate change and Progressive Apartheid and their ilk are now ascending from laying the groundwork via preparatory deconstruction, into the springboards for the execution of revolution.
Both during the run-up to this “global governance,” and to help maintain power once in place – the world’s population best remains divided. This renders it easier to manipulate and control. So, a combination of Progressive Apartheid (convincing folks that “your plight is caused by ‘systemic racism’”), and “climate change” (convincing folks of an existential requirement for “sustainability”) will be the propagandists’ primary vehicles of mass deception and control.
Also within the realm of likelihood (if not inevitability), is an intentional redux of the 2008 “financial crisis” – again occurring before the upcoming Presidential election (or at least before the “coming out” discussed further below).
Deception – perception manufacture and management – is critical, for the globalists intend for the masses to have increasingly declining standards of living – even as the elite exponentially grows its wealth. Between them will be the nomenklatura administrative and policing bureaucracy; its loyalty secured by permitting them to live better than the masses (think the federal bureaucracy in D.C., that is paid and enjoys a lifestyle far better than its private-sector equivalents).
The masses’ neo-feudal condition will be rationalized under U.N. Agenda 2030 fabrications regarding the critical, the existential need for “sustainability.” Deprivation of real meat to eat, no-longer-affordable personal transportation and so stuffed into public transit, and ever-smaller and denser housing units will be their lot – necessary for the very survival of the planet. Yet there will be salves to placate them: the bread and circuses of social media and streaming entertainment, and a “universal basic income.”
Space does not permit a complete discussion verifying the totalitarian (and thus dystopian) nature of what is intended by the Corporatist Communists. Suffice it to say, some quick research into what Agenda 2030 (and Ocasio-Cortez’s effective plagiarizing of it, the “Green New Deal”) would entail if fully implemented, as well as The Great Reset (see below), will be a good start. Collectivists have always peddled a utopian vision (such as “Peace, Land and Bread” and “Workers’ Paradise” and “Social Justice”), and the globalists’ web sites will be no different. But once you remove the scales from your eyes, you too will see that the dystopian conclusion is valid.
At present, the Corporatist Communists are not over the finish line. Prerequisite to establishing this “global governance” regime is the elimination of the United States; for this country as founded stands as an impenetrable roadblock – if for no other reason, if we retain our liberty as embedded in our founding, then we would remain as that “shining city on a hill” contrast to the rest of the world. The Corporatist Communist elite fully recognizes that the contrast would eventually promote dissension amongst the sustainable serf class in the rest of the world.
For a whole host of reasons, the military conquest of the United States is not a viable path. No, the people of the United States must be enticed to neuter – to “fundamentally transform” – the country through a revolution against our founding.
Ideally doing so through the ballot box, so as to maintain pretenses of “democracy in action” (useful for deluding the public as to what’s happened to them, and for the perceived legitimacy of that future trans-national elected body). Revolution through the ballot box is not far-fetched; rather, it is a long-established totalitarian methodology:
Few Americans are familiar with a department of human art in which European radicals have specialized for many years — the art of revolution. Revolution through the barricades or by mass proletarian attack upon a regime is no longer thought to be a practical art. Revolution by procedures within the framework of the existing constitutional system has been for many years the accepted technique. There is a considerable literature on this subject which Americans, little concerned with revolution, have ignored. But we know that Mussolini’s reading had been largely devoted to this very literature. The central objective of this type of revolution is to produce confusion. Groups of all sorts unfriendly to the regime must be encouraged and activated whether they are in agreement with the revolutionists or not. They add to the divisions and the sense of hopelessness. Violence is a second arm of action. It intimidates the weak and creates disorder that harries the indifferent citizens. Within this atmosphere of division, intimidation, and disorder it is possible for an audacious and assertive and cocksure minority to force itself into power by quasi-constitutional means after which it can use the parliamentary and constitutional instruments it then controls to work its will upon the whole fabric of the society. The Fascist Party performed this function. – What Is Fascism?, John T. Flynn (2008)
Is the above paragraph not reminiscent of what we are seeing in our streets and cities, and halls of Congress, right now? Did not “Antifa” and “Black Lives Matter” come to mind as you read that? They should have! Alarm bells should have been ringing in your mind, as it also provides an insightful translation of the actual meaning behind Democrats’ recent allusions to a mob-like quid pro quo – that if we elect Joe Biden (or his Democrat replacement), the violent rioting in our streets will end. Also, their serious discussions about eliminating the Senate filibuster, and packing the Supreme Court.
It’s not just Flynn who described the dynamic at play. See also And Not a Shot is Fired (just read the Introduction).
A must-read is John Fonte’s prescient Liberal Democracy vs. Transnational Progressivism: The Future of the Ideological Civil War Within the West from 2002.
Then, go reread the paragraph above from What Is Fascism?
Are scales not falling from your eyes?
Is a revolutionary template not being followed “to the ‘t’”?
The products of our education system that we now see controlling journalism, entertainment, academia, and rioting under Antifa and BLM banners prove that decades of Cultural Marxism and its internal sabotage of culture and institutions as a preparation of the revolutionaries’ battlespace has been completed.
Now, about that coming-out mentioned at the beginning of this piece. It’s being billed as The Great Reset and scheduled for next January by the World Economic Forum (WEF) – the title alone hints at the audacious scope of what is planned (recall Fonte’s “Transnational Progressivism”). With scales removed from eyes, a quick perusal of who all is involved with this “Great Reset,” and their plans under its banner – read in conjunction with Agenda 2030 – is truly the stuff of “new world order” dystopian nightmares.
The revolution is now underway.
It is sound speculation that the timing of The Great Reset is deliberately intended to coincide with the inauguration of a President of the United States who is not Donald J. Trump – whether as the result of an honest election or a stolen one. The Progressives-Democrats, and the power brokers behind them, realize that if they topple Trump, their revolution succeeds. And if they don’t topple him, the second term of President Trump will cast light upon their schemes, which would prove fatal to their Satanic enterprise.
President Trump is our American fortress under siege, our electoral Fort McHenry. The stakes in this election – for our country, and for peoples everywhere – are existential.
By the dawn’s early light of November 4th will our star-spangled banner yet wave?
“Choose your side now. Pray now. And when the time comes, be a counter-revolutionary. Vote against candidates of globalist tyranny – that is any and all candidates from the Democrat Party. Vote for the candidate of righteousness, patriotism, and liberty.” – Donald J. Trump.