Terrorist Mark Rudd’s Warning on the Destruction of America’s Defenses

By: Trevor Loudon
New Zeal

President Barack Obama and his Democratic allies are using U.S. economic problems (which they partially created) to sell Americans on the need to cut defense spending.

This is what America’s enemies have wanted for decades. If America can be disarmed, Russia, China, Cuba and Iran will face little or no opposition to their plans for world domination.

More than two years ago, Cuban trained, former Weather Underground terrorist Mark Rudd, warned us that Obama’s game plan would be to exploit economic crises to push for defense cuts.

Mark Rudd, 1968

Rudd, an unrepentant Marxist to this day, works closely with at least three people who have been close to Obama in the recent past – Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and Carl Davidson. He is in a unique position to understand Obama’s long term strategy.

Mark Rudd wrote this analysis just after the 2008 elections:

Obama is a very strategic thinker. He knew precisely what it would take to get elected and didn’t blow it. He used community organizing methods to mobilize a base consisting of many people who had never voted before or who regularly don’t vote….But he also knew that what he said had to basically play to the center to not be run over by the press, the Republicans, scare centrist and cross-over voters away. He made it.

So he has a narrow mandate for change, without any direction specified. What he’s doing now is moving on the most popular issues — the environment, health care, and the economy. He’ll be progressive on the environment because that has broad popular support; health care will be extended to children, then made universal, but the medical, pharmaceutical, and insurance corporations will stay in place, perhaps yielding some power; the economic agenda will stress stimulation from the bottom sometimes and handouts to the top at other times. It will be pragmatic…

And I agree with this strategy. Anything else will court sure defeat. Move on the stuff you can to a small but significant extent, gain support and confidence. Leave the military alone because they’re way too powerful. For now, until enough momentum is raised. By the second or third year of this recession, when stimulus is needed at the bottom, people may begin to discuss cutting the military budget if security is being increased through diplomacy and application of nascent international law.

Obama plays basketball. I’m not much of an athlete, barely know the game, but one thing I do know is that you have to be able to look like you’re doing one thing but do another. That’s why all these conservative appointments are important: the strategy is feint to the right, move left. Any other strategy invites sure defeat. It would be stupid to do otherwise in this environment…

Read Obama’s first book, “Dreams from My Father.” The second section is the story of his three years doing community organizing in Chicago. It’s some of the best writing on organizing I’ve ever seen. That’s all it’s about, the core of the book. Obama learned many lessons of strategy and patience…

This is no stupid guy… Had any of the stupid Republicans read his books, they never could have said, “We don’t know who this guy is.” You know every thought he’s ever had.

This is as honest an evaluation of Obama’s strategy and tactics as you are likely to get.

Leave the military alone because they’re way too powerful. For now, until enough momentum is raised.By the second or third year of this recession, when stimulus is needed at the bottom, people may begin to discuss cutting the military budget if security is being increased through diplomacy and application of nascent international law.

That is the key phrase in Rudd’s essay.

The recession is three years in. Americans are war weary and worried about their jobs, their homes and their children’s future.

Obama has negotiated the New START disarmament treaty with Russia and invoked the United Nations’ Responsibility to Protect Doctrine in Libya.

Defense cuts are now on the agenda – supported by even some Republicans. Americans are being told the world is a place, reality notwithstanding.

In the most unstable period since World War 2, the U.S. is about to lower its defenses both globally and at home.

Wish I was a champagne merchant in Moscow right now.



By: AJ

Entice large American corporations into the UN Global Compact and the de-industrialization of America becomes a reality in short order. A selection of the corporations who are already members of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), which is now part of the UN Global Compact, can be found HERE.

The UN Global Compact was initiated in 2000 and has been accelerating since 2010, no doubt due to support provided by President Obama and George Soros. The goal of the UN Global Compact is to create public-private and global-local partnerships. Basically, this means “globalizing” private corporations so that they will operate at the behest and direction of the international rulers (i.e. global elites), not the US government and certainly not based on American consumer demand.

In other words, American corporations that join the UN Global Compact will follow the dictates of Global Governance (i.e. the New World Order) not America’s free market system.

As described in the April 4, 2011, 4-page PDF found HERE, the UN Global Compact stays true to the global elite’s goal of controlling absolutely everything by incorporating “two related global issue platforms: Caring for Climate and the CEO Water Mandate.”

“The voluntary and demand driven nature of the initiative calls for a multi-centric governance framework enabling participant ownership, supporting accountability mechanisms, and advancing intergovernmental oversight.

Understanding how Global Compact governance is exercised, and why it is exercised in this particular way, requires appreciating (a) the institutional context in which the initiative is embedded, (b) its underlying operational context, and (c) the changing context of sustainability itself. These three contextual dimensions of Global Compact governance have evolved significantly over the last decade and thus need to be vetted against their historic background.

The initiating speech… was translated into an institutional innovation which aimed at deepening the interdependencies between the United Nations, the business community, NGOs [Non-Government Organizations], and labor. With Secretary-General Ban’s tenure starting in 2007 and him chairing the Global Compact Leaders Summit in the same year, the Global Compact moved into its next phase.

To conclude, context matters when thinking about Global Compact governance. As the Global Compact blends public and private actors, it also combines legitimacy from both spheres. While public legitimacy rests on intergovernmental support, private legitimacy relates to participants’ implementation accountability… The governance framework was (and still is) significantly shaped by the initiative’s institutional and operational context as well as the context of the larger sustainability movement that the Global Compact is an important part of. Contexts, however, change and so do the needs of governance (in this sense history matters as well).”

Ask yourself how Americans benefit when our corporations become part of the UN Global Compact. Under the dictates of the global elites, do you think this will strengthen or weaken America? Will it create more jobs in America? Or will it create more jobs in other countries? Obama’s embrace of the “international community” and his stated references to us as “global citizens” begs the question… is this why he hasn’t focused on jobs for the tens of millions of unemployed American citizens?

Notice that General Electric (GE) and AT&T are on the list of corporations who joined the UN Global Contract. Is it a coincidence that they paid nothing – zero, nada, zilch – in federal taxes for 2010? Seems Obama made them a deal they couldn’t refuse. And we’re all aware that Obama appointed Jeffery Immelt (GE’s CEO) as his Green Jobs Czar.

While President Obama and his union comrades attempt to guide the majority of Americans toward the class-warfare red herring, Obama’s been cozying up to the leaders of large corporations for a reason. We’re all aware of his cozy relationship with the CEO’s of Google and Facebook.

Take a stroll down Wall Street and ask a few of the movers and shakers if they support President Obama. Ask the CEO of Goldman Sachs if he supports President Obama. The answer will be a resounding “YES.” The Finance Reform bill, passed by the 111th Congress, seals up government control of America’s financial institutions, but it only scratches the surface of the scope and depth of the global takeover of American industry.

Notice that Monsanto is on the UN Global Contract list. The Food Safety Act, passed by the 111th Congress, gives our government control of America’s food supply and Monsanto is positioned to carry out the global elite’s orders. As we speak, Cass Sunstein, President Obama’s Regulatory Czar, is creating regulations which will prohibit Americans from growing food or having gardens on their property. Also, George Soros has been buying up grain elevators and is now the third largest holder of America’s grain elevators.

The cast of globalists who serve on the UN Global Compact Board

Last but not least, Jose Sergio Gabrielli de Azevedo, President and CEO of Brazil’s Petrobras, the corporation that Obama and George Soros gave billions of dollars to assist their oil development. George Soros invested his own money, but Barack Obama gave $2 Billion of our tax dollars to assist Brazil in creating jobs and maximizing their oil production at the expense of hard working American citizens.

Enticing American businesses into the UN Global Compact will be beneficial to other countries and a detriment to America. Innovation starts here, through which America has become the most prosperous nation on the planet and employees – yes, “workers” – have thrived in their ability to provide for their families and enjoy modern conveniences that people in other countries do not.

What benefit is there to placing American businesses under global governance led by the global elites? There’s no benefit whatsoever for America. The purpose is to de-industrialize America by ensuring our corporate giants operate elsewhere.

When President Obama said he would fundamentally transform America, he wasn’t kidding. This kind of transformation will change the lives of all Americans in the worst possible way.