Daily Archives: June 7, 2012

06/7/12

National Day of Blogger Silence — This Friday

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

Chris Muir at Day by Day Cartoon

In Observance of the National Day of Blogger Silence — This Friday, NoisyRoom will go dark and silent. No posting, no Facebook, no Twitter… We stand in solidarity with other bloggers on Friday this week in protest of the violation of our Constitutional rights.

Silencing the Clarions

Read more:

—————-

Chambliss Demands Inquiry Into Attacks Against Conservative Commentators

Sends letter to Attorney General Eric Holder about recent “SWAT-ting” incidents

Chambliss Demands Inquiry Into Attacks Against Conservative Commentators

Sends letter to Attorney General Eric Holder about recent “SWAT-ting” incidents

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder regarding recent reports that several conservative political commentators have been targeted with harassing and frightening actions. Chambliss demanded that Holder examine these cases to determine if federal laws have been violated.

These dangerous hoaxes, also known as “SWAT-ting,” occur when a perpetrator contacts local police to report a violent incident at a target’s home. These callers are believed to utilize voice-over IP (VOIP) and other less-traditional telecommunications methods to make the call appear to come from the target residence and to hide the caller’s true identity.

In response, a dispatcher sends a SWAT team or other police unit in a heightened state of readiness to the unsuspecting target’s residence. Targets only learn of these false reports when a large police presence descends upon their homes.

In the letter, Chambliss states that “Any potentially criminal action that incites fear, seeks to silence a dissenting opinion, and collaterally wastes the resources of law enforcement should be given close scrutiny at all levels… Regardless of any potential political differences that may exist, threats and intimidation have no place in our national political discourse. Those who choose to enter into that political discourse should not have to worry about potential threats to their or their family’s safety.”

A copy of the signed letter is attached, and the full text of the letter is below:

June 5, 2012

The Honorable Eric Holder

Attorney General

Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Suite 5111

Washington, DC 20530-0009

Dear Attorney General Holder:

I am writing with concern regarding recent reports that several members of the community of online political commentators have been targeted with harassing and frightening actions. Any potentially criminal action that incites fear, seeks to silence a dissenting opinion, and collaterally wastes the resources of law enforcement should be given close scrutiny at all levels.

According to these individuals’ reports, these dangerous hoaxes, also known as “SWAT-ting,” have a perpetrator contacting a local police department to report some type of violent incident at the home of the target. It is believed that these callers utilize some of the less traditional telecommunications methods, including voice over IP (VOIP) to make the call appear as though it is coming from the target residence and to better hide the true identity of the caller.

In response, a dispatcher then sends a large number of understandably anxious police units, in a heightened state of readiness, to the home of the still unsuspecting target. The first that the target or their unsuspecting family learns of this false report to law enforcement is when they are shocked to see an abnormal police presence descending on their residence.

The use of SWAT-ting as a harassment tool is apparently not new, but its use as a tool for targeting political speech appears to be a more recent development. During the last year, some of the more widely reported cases of SWAT-ting have taken place against blog operators across the country, including in Georgia. The emerging pattern is both disturbing and dangerous.

While these incidences are currently small in number, and have fortunately not led to any accidental physical harm, they are extremely concerning. The perpetrators appear to be targeting individuals who are vigorously exercising their First Amendment rights to political speech. As you know, these reported efforts to intimidate those who choose to enter the political forum and express their opinions are in conflict with the founding principles of our nation.

Regardless of any potential political differences that may exist, threats and intimidation have no place in our national political discourse. Those who choose to enter into that political discourse should not have to worry about potential threats to their or their family’s safety.

While I am certain that local law enforcement is reviewing each of these instances, I am asking you to please look into each of these cases as well to determine if any federal laws may have been violated. Future targets of SWAT-ting, whether engaged in political speech or not, may not be so fortunate as to escape physical harm.

I appreciate your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your response no later than June 29, 2012. Please feel free to contact my office with any questions or comments that you may have.

06/7/12

As Goes Wisconsin Goes the USA – Obama Descends on San Francisco with Maoist Media in Tow

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

While America is burning to the ground, Obama is out raising more dough for his campaign coffers. Probably more to the point, he went running to California for more money when the unions got handed their commie asses in Wisconsin as Walker soundly trounced his Marxist competition.

So, geez… Obama is forced to brave the riffraff – you know the same ones he referred to in Frisco the last time, the ones who cling to their guns and their religion – just to squeeze a few million more out of Californian Communists. The things he has to suffer for a dictatorship.

But Obama and his minions couldn’t shake Zombie, who has once again compiled a masterful photo essay on his visit. Along with the incredibly brave Tea Partiers as well as a whole host of whackadoos, Zombie got it all in pictures. Ready and able to leap tall Progressives in a single bound, Zombie dogged O’s every red footstep. My hero… Sniff. 🙂

PJTatler / Zombie: Obama’s first post-Wisconsin fundraiser “memejacked” by S.F. Tea Party

The Occupy Movement seemed to be strangely absent on Obama’s visit. Must be busy somewhere terrorizing some innocent shop owner, beating defenseless Americans or standing in line outside a rape tent somewhere. But Obama’s Maoist media was there with their nifty red and gold pins. Check out the pictures Zombie took of them. Tre Chic in a murderous Communist sort of way.

So while Americans are desperately getting rid of the unions, Progressives and Communists, you can rest assured Obama is rubbing elbows with wealthy celebrities and begging for money while telling crass jokes that diminish and tarnish the Oval Office. November can’t come soon enough…

06/7/12

Obama and Dems in denial about life after Wisconsin smackdown

By: Jeffrey Klein
Political Buzz Examiner

Wherever you looked yesterday and continuing on today, every Democrat from President Obama on down has attempted to show a steely poker face–when asked about the impact on their future as a result of Gov. Scott Walker’s decisive win in Wisconsin on Tuesday.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, was having to answer this difficult question from the press corps on board Air Force One yesterday, which was shuttling President Obama to his almost weekly round of “left coast” campaign fund-raisers.

He pointed to exit polls to argue that Wisconsin’s voters in November would be “substantially different” from the makeup of the electorate on Tuesday, but added that those who cast ballots in the recall “said they believed that the president’s policies are the right policies to protect the middle class,” according to Oliver Knox article in Yahoo News yesterday.

He was referring to the fact that the exit polls indicated that voters still favored Obama by 7 points over Romney in November–but, wasn’t this the very same exit poll that had shown Tuesday’s recall election race to be a 50/50 dead heat that was too close to call?

Even John King, CNN anchor stated in horror that there was definitely a flaw in the model used in the exit poll—which obviously revealed a distinct difference between the political profile of exit poll voter’s and that of the voters who actually handed Gov. Walker a stunning 7 point win against a long embedded Wisconsin Democrat.

Then, when Carney was asked for the president’s reaction to the No. 1 news story in American politics, he told reporters: “I didn’t have much of a conversation with the president about Wisconsin.”

Sure.

Then, top Obama reelection strategist David Axelrod said the results amounted to “a bad night” for Romney.

What?

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz was quoted as saying that “Despite the disappointing outcome [the vote] sent Scott Walker a message that his brand of divisive politics is offensive and wrong.”

Then that would mean that President Obama’s 2008 53-47 win sent a message that George Bush was loved all across America–which is a lot closer to reality.

Finally, the Obama campaign’s Wisconsin state director, Tripp Wellde, said the results sent a “strong message” to Walker.

Yes it did … “I won and your team got clobbered!”

According to the author of the article, these comments proved a bit [too] much for Tim Miller, RNC spokesman, who said Team Obama’s response was comparable to Saddam Hussein’s delusional—and/or dishonest—spokesman during the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.

“The Obama campaign’s response is reminiscent of ‘Baghdad Bob’ spinning the fall of Baghdad. We’ve only lost 21 points in 4 years! Seriously guys, all is well!” Miller joked to Yahoo News.

Then, the May campaign fund raising figures came released today.

Gov. Mitt Romney brought in a combined $76.8 million for his campaign and the Romney Victory Fund, a joint account between the Romney campaign and the Republican National Committee, a $17 million advantage over the “roughly” $60 million raised by President Obama and the Democrat National Committee, according to Holly Bailey’s article in Yahoo News today.

Here we go again on the Democrat reactions.

Ben LaBolt, an Obama campaign spokesman, downplayed Romney’s fundraising boom, by saying … “we knew this day would come … we anticipated that they would beat us this month,” but the Obama campaign will focus on “growing our donor base.”

And he wasted no time in sounding the alarm for Democrats by telling reporters on the conference call … “That should serve as a clarion call to our supporters and our donors.”

The report further indicated that the Romney campaign and the RNC had $107 million in cash on hand at the end of May, while the Obama campaign has not yet announced its month end bank balance…

Karl Rove pointed out that the Badger State now looks more like it did in 2000 and 2004, when Democrats narrowly carried it by margins of 5,708 votes and 11,384 votes, respectively, in his Wall Street Journal article today.

And GOP tracking surveys showed Walker had won by 172,739 votes, a substantial 39% increase over his 124,638 vote 2010 margin of victory against the same opponent.

Rove noted this negative trend and the implications for President Obama, who had won the state in 2008 by 414,818 votes.

Team Obama has finally admitted that Wisconsin is now a tossup in 2012.

FOXNews political analyst, Chris Stirewalt, explained the end game from Walker’s Wisconsin win in simple terms, in his article today, titled “Dems Can’t Make it Without Government Worker Unions.”

“The cycle for five decades has been that unions support the campaigns of Democrats who promise to expand the power of unions. Thus empowered, the unions have more money with which to elect more Democrats who further expand union powers. And so it goes.

Or, so it went.

Stirewalt outlined how this Democrat-Union taxpayer “money laundering scheme” worked:

“Democrats rake in huge sums as an indirect subsidy from taxpayers. You pay your property tax, your property tax funds county government payrolls, your county government gives a slice of that money to AFSCME and AFSCME gives some to like-minded politicians to stay in office.”

Then he concluded, “Democrats have come to rely so heavily on the party’s symbiosis with government-worker unions, an accelerating decline in the fiscal crisis facing so much of the nation would prove disastrous.”

Any way you slice it–sounds like the virtual end of the Democrat party.

Regardless of the nonsensical denials and obfuscations, just like the young man in the CNN video–they know it.

06/7/12

Barack Obama’s Ties to the Marxist Led New Party and “Progressive Chicago”

By: Trevor Loudon
New Zeal

Author Stanley Kurtz has released new information, confirming that, despite Obama campaign denials, Barack Obama was a member of the Chicago New Party, in 1996.

There is also documentary evidence that Obama was not only an active member, but a leader of a New Party sister organization Progressive Chicago, as far back as 1993.

Furthermore, there is ample evidence that the New Party/Progressive Chicago was set up by Marxists, for Marxists, in order to increase far left influence in the Democratic Party, and eventually establish a leftist major party to replace the Democrats entirely.

Strong in the mid to late 1990s, the New Party was an electoral alliance dedicated to electing leftist candidates to office – usually through the Democratic Party.

Two organizations formed the backbone of the New Party – the Democratic Socialists of America and the US’ then largest radical organization, ACORN. Radical labor union SEIU also had considerable input, as did members of the Communist Party USA spin off, Committees of Correspondence. DSA had infiltrated ACORN, SEIU and Committees of Correspondence, so arguably the socialists were the real power behind the New Party.

Elaine Bernard and Kurt Stand of Democratic Socialists of America, and Judy Page of the New Party were speakers on the Towards a New Party panel sponsored by the DSA at the Tenth Annual Socialist Scholars Conference, held April 24-26, 1992 at the Borough of Manhattan Community College, New York City.

Bernard and Page were later active in the New Party, while Stand was later jailed as an East German and Soviet spy.

Barack Obama, incidentally, used to attend the annual Socialist Scholars conferences, while studying at Columbia University in New York in the early 1980s.

In Chicago, the New Party founded an equally radical “sister organization,” Progressive Chicago.

In Chicago, the New Party consisted mainly of ACORN, Democratic Socialists of America, SEIU and the Committees of Correspondence.

According to Chicago DSA’s New Ground number 35, 1995, the Chicago New Party began to get organized in January 1995.

On Saturday, January 14, the New Party in Chicago took another step in its effort to establish itself as a political force by holding a major outreach meeting directed at Chicago’s Left. About 100 people, with sizable delegations from DSA and CoC among others, heard Bruce Colburn and Elaine Bernard preach the gospel of the New Party…

Elaine Bernard was a Labor Studies lecturer at Harvard and Bruce Colburn, also a DSAer, was an officer of the Milwaukee Central Labor Council and the Chair of the local New Party affiliate in Milwaukee.

The meeting was held at the meeting hall of SEIU Local 880, a local that is tackling the extremely difficult task of organizing home health care workers in Illinois. SEIU Local 880 and ACORN share office space.

DSA and their CoC and SEIU allies saw the New Party as a vehicle for major political change to both move the Democratic Party leftward and to eventually prepare the ground for an entirely new third party.

At a meeting attended by Chicago DSA members Kurt Anderson and Bob Roman, plus CoC supporters Ronelle Mustin and Sandy Patrinos, CoC leader and Obama associate Carl Davidson explained the New Party’s role in first working through the Democratic Party then eventually replacing it.

On January 27th approximately 45 people attended the Chicago DSA and Chicago CoC organized public form at the ACTWU hall on Ashland Ave. Each organization had two representatives on the panel to present their particular elections ’94 post-mortem perspectives. Chicago DSA was represented by Co-Chair, Kurt Anderson and Political Education Officer, Bob Roman. CoC was represented by Carl Davidson, who is a member of CoC’s National Coordinating Committee and Ronelle Mustin, an activist from the 22nd ward. The event was chaired by Sandi Patrinos, chair of Chicago CoC…

Carl Davidson wanted to focus on “voting patterns.” There were essentially two winners. Naturally the Republicans, but so were the most left in Congress such as the Progressive and Black Caucuses. The latter were re-elected while the neo-liberal and conservative Democrats were voted out. More importantly this election was the de facto defeat of the elitist Democratic Leadership Council who do not care about the poor or Labor.

To win elections, Davidson emphasized that there are two necessary coinciding factors. First, a passive majority… Secondly, a militant minority, which came to fruition for the Right wing with the Christian Coalition…

Hence Davidson emphasized that in this historical period the Left’s strategy must be electoral politics not revolution. Consequently the Left must galvanize the “majority” – the working class and poor… Moreover the democratic left needs get active in the New Party which has won 20 of 30 local elections. Thus a short-term strategy of working with the Democratic Party and in the long-term work with the New Party.

Barack Obama clearly saw the potential of the New Party, because he was soon seeking their support – alongside fellow DSA associates Willie Delgado and Miguel del Valle.

About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics…

The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia’s District; and Barack Obama, chief of staff for State Sen. Alice Palmer. Obama is running for Palmer’s vacant seat…

Although ACORN and SEIU Local 880 were the harbingers of the NP there was a strong presence of CoC and DSA (15% DSA)… Four political candidates were “there” seeking NP support.

Barack Obama won the 1996 election by using legal technicalities to get all his opponents disqualified – but he still encouraged New Party volunteers to help him with his ongoing program.

The NP’s ’96 Political Program has been enormously successful with 3 of 4 endorsed candidates winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NP membership meeting on April 11th to express their gratitude.

Danny Davis, winner in the 7th Congressional District, invited NPers to join his Campaign Steering Committee.

Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration…

Did Obama actually join the New Party?

Danny Davis joined the Chicago New Party during his successful Congressional 1996 campaign on the Democratic Party ticket.

New Party News Spring 1996 page 1, celebrated the Davis’ Congressional victory and went on to say:

“New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary)…”these victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work’ said Obama”.

This photo from New Party News names Obama and “NP endorsed” candidates.

This clipping from the same issue of New Party News page 1 names Obama and Davis as New Party “members.”

Progressive Chicago was founded in 1993 by members of the New Party, in particular Madeline Talbott and Dan Swinney.

In an April 27, 1993 letter to prospective Progressive Chicago members, Dan Swinney wrote:

I recently have become interested in the New Party as well as committed myself to see if we can build a Progressive Chicago network, working with Madeline Talbott of ACORN – the local New Party convener.

I wanted to introduce you to the NP and Progressive Chicago and would like to talk to you about it to see if there is a role you want to play.

Enclosed is a brochure, a longer description of the NP and the ideas behind it…

A circa 1993 Progressive Chicago introductory pamphlet stated:

Progressive Chicago was started by members of the New Party who wanted to be able to put together an organization strong enough to win: If that means supporting a candidate running as a Democrat, then fine. If that means running our own candidates in aldermanic or state representative races on whatever line that gives them the best chance of winning, fine.

Barack Obama was probably approached to join Progressive Chicago as early July 7, 1993 as this unsigned handwritten note suggests.

According to the same note, Obama was “more than happy to be involved”:

By September 1993, Obama was one of 17 people listed as a signatory on all Progressive Chicago letters – as shown by the second page of this September 22 Progressive Chicago letter to Joe Gardner.

On December 31, 1993, Progressive Chicago wrote to all key members, including Obama, inviting them to a January 19, 1994 meeting.

Clearly Obama’s involvement in Progressive Chicago was high level and lasted at least several months.

Like its “sister organization,” the New Party, Progressive Chicago was heavily infiltrated by supporters of Democratic Socialists of America and the Communist Party USA spin off Committees of Correspondence.

In late 1993, Progressive Chicago letters were always endorsed by 17 people:

  • Ron Sable – New Party contact. A member of Democratic Socialists of America and former associate member of the Marxist New American Movement.
  • Dwayne Harris – 21st Century Vote.
  • David Orr – Cook County Clerk. Closely tied to Democratic Socialists of America.
  • Ernestine Whiting, ACORN.
  • Madeline Talbott, ACORN and New Party. A former colleague of Barack Obama in Project Vote! Chicago Coalition.
  • Bessie Cannon, President SEIU Local 880.
  • Keith Kelleher, Head organizer SEIU Local 880. New Party builder.
  • Joe Gardner Commissioner, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District. New Party contact. A former colleague of Barack Obama in Project Vote! Chicago Coalition.
  • Lou Pardo, Northwest Voter Registration Project. An Obama associate from Project Vote! Chicago Coalition days. A New Party and Democratic Socialists of America member and an affiliate of the Committees of Correspondence.
  • Rene David Luna, ADAPT.
  • Dick Simpson. A supporter of Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, forerunner of Democratic Socialists of America.
  • Danny Davis. A New Party member with Obama. A member of Democratic Socialists of America and an associate of Committees of Correspondence and the Communist Party USA. Now an Illinois Congressman.
  • Carol Harwell, United Voter Registration League. Later Obama’s campaign manager.
  • Barack Obama, New Party member. A long time associate of Democratic Socialists of America, Committees of Correspondence and Communist Party USA.
  • Ron Davis.
  • Carl Davidson, Networking for Democracy. A New Party member. A member of the Committees of Correspondence and a long time Obama associate and enabler. Later a founder of Progressives for Obama.
  • Philip Jahn, Teamsters Local 743.

People targeted or solicited to join Progressive Chicago included Obama political mentor and Communist Party USA affiliate Alice Palmer, Communist Party member Frank Lumpkin, Rev. Jim Reed of Christians for Socialism and Democratic Socialists of America members or associates Miguel Del Valle, Carole Travis, Clem Balanoff, Sue Purrington and Jane Ramsey.

Clearly Barack Obama was in the New Party orbit way before 1996.

Clearly he was working closely with socialists and Marxists in both the New Party and Progressive Chicago.

The Obama camp has denied the Obama/New Party connection.

So clearly there are two stories here. First Obama’s documented involvement with two Marxist dominated groups in Chicago. Second, the seemingly deliberate coverup of that involvement.

The involvement of Sarah Palin’s husband in the Alaska Independence Party in the early 1990s was well covered by the MSM in 2008. Mitt Romney’s alleged hazing of a gay fellow high school student decades ago received nationwide coverage.

Why is Obama’s well documented and comparatively recent involvement with Chicago Marxists not on the front page of every major newspaper in the United States?

Trevor Loudon blogs at TrevorLoudon.com, edits the KeyWiki website (an online encyclopedia of the US left) and is the author of a newly released book on the US President’s communist and Marxist ties: Barack Obama and the Enemies Within.